Fantasy Baseball?

Originally posted by callat703:

Max Games Played: 170

Max Innings Pitched: 1300
I would prefer this to be 162 (just to please the baseball gods).

And 1500 Innings if we're doing W, S and H. 1300 is fine if we're not doing holds.
Originally posted by HoyaParanoia:
Originally posted by callat703:
Jesus Christ, this is way over my head.
it's the most accurate way to determine a player's "value" to his team that i could come up with using the yahoo statistics … i'd really like to include defensive stats, but most of the major stats (fielding %, errors, etc) are just not indicative of overall defensive play, and it's kind of impossible for yahoo to use STATS Inc.'s "Zone Rating" system

i miss baseball!!!1!1!
Uh…right. But I have no idea what any of the numbers and half of the abbreviations that you put up there even mean.
Originally posted by vansmack:
Originally posted by callat703:

Max Games Played: 170

Max Innings Pitched: 1300
I would prefer this to be 162 (just to please the baseball gods).

And 1500 Innings if we're doing W, S and H. 1300 is fine if we're not doing holds.
1500 seems a bit excessive. I'd split the difference and go to 1400?

And 162 is fine. I'm not sure why it went to 170; I think that was a mistake.
So after reviewing last year's categories.

If we'd like to even out the categories between pitchers and hitters, I'd opt for 6x6:

AVG, HR, RBI, R, BB, SB

and

W, K, SV, HLDS, ERA, WHIP


Thoughts?
yes, my hockey team sucks. i keep forgetting it exists, and i'm sorry about that, because i know there's nothing worse than a lazy owner, even one at the bottom of the standings. i can assure you i'd be kicking all of your asses in fantasy basketball, which is my best fantasy sport.
Originally posted by BookerT:
yes, my hockey team sucks. i keep forgetting it exists, and i'm sorry about that, because i know there's nothing worse than a lazy owner
same here
Originally posted by callat703:
Thoughts?
OPS! although i didnt win this argument last year, and i doubt people have come around to the dark side in just one year
Originally posted by HoyaParanoia:
OPS! although i didnt win this argument last year, and i doubt people have come around to the dark side in just one year
I've meant to apologize to you for that for a while now. My solid argument about Barry Bonds ruining OPS for everybody never came to fruition.

Anyhow, I think I'd rather see AVG and either OPS or OBP instead of BB. I like to reward those that get HBP too.
Originally posted by HoyaParanoia:
Originally posted by callat703:
Thoughts?
OPS! although i didnt win this argument last year, and i doubt people have come around to the dark side in just one year
How about AVG and OPS instead of BB?
Let me know about OPS versus BB.

Rather than the Private Message thing, here is league info:

Yahoo Fantasy Baseball

League ID#: 64815
League Name: 930 Club Fantasy Baseball
Password: backbar
Originally posted by vansmack:
I've meant to apologize to you for that for a while now. My solid argument about Barry Bonds ruining OPS for everybody never came to fruition.
oh well, not your fault he didn't play … but i'm still not convinced the argument holds water even if he was in

Originally posted by vansmack:
Anyhow, I think I'd rather see AVG and either OPS or OBP instead of BB. I like to reward those that get HBP too.
explain again why on earth we'd want to have AVG and OBP?
Originally posted by vansmack:
Originally posted by callat703:

Max Games Played: 170

Max Innings Pitched: 1300
I would prefer this to be 162 (just to please the baseball gods).

And 1500 Innings if we're doing W, S and H. 1300 is fine if we're not doing holds.
the more innings, the better to me. i ran out of IP last year in one league i was in. it kind of sucked. there were like 2-3 weeks left in the season too!
Originally posted by HoyaParanoia:
Originally posted by vansmack:
I've meant to apologize to you for that for a while now. My solid argument about Barry Bonds ruining OPS for everybody never came to fruition.
oh well, not your fault he didn't play … but i'm still not convinced the argument holds water even if he was in

Originally posted by vansmack:
Anyhow, I think I'd rather see AVG and either OPS or OBP instead of BB. I like to reward those that get HBP too.
explain again why on earth we'd want to have AVG and OBP?
Not OBP; I'm talking about OPS - combining slugging and on base percentage.
Originally posted by HoyaParanoia:
explain again why on earth we'd want to have AVG and OBP?
I can't really. I just didn't like BB as it's own category.

I'm impartial to OBP or OPS, but considering AVG makes up over 90% of one category and HR plus AVG makes up a good percentage of the other, in a HR only league, I really don't think one is that much better than the other.
Originally posted by vansmack:
Originally posted by HoyaParanoia:
explain again why on earth we'd want to have AVG and OBP?
I can't really. I just didn't like BB as it's own category.

I'm impartial to OBP or OPS, but considering AVG makes up over 90% of one category and HR plus AVG makes up a good percentage of the other, in a HR only league, I really don't think one is that much better than the other.
I personally like BB as an individual category when coupled with AVG. I recognize it may not be as great as OPS or OBP in valuing players. But it allows you to draft a bit more strategically. Gives certain players some more value, and trims value from others.
Well, I'll jump in again this year - should be able to improve on last year's mediocre showing…
League is almost full! Need maybe one more. Come on guys and gals.