Originally posted by callat703:I would prefer this to be 162 (just to please the baseball gods).
Max Games Played: 170
Max Innings Pitched: 1300
And 1500 Innings if we're doing W, S and H. 1300 is fine if we're not doing holds.
Originally posted by callat703:I would prefer this to be 162 (just to please the baseball gods).
Max Games Played: 170
Max Innings Pitched: 1300
Originally posted by HoyaParanoia:Uh…right. But I have no idea what any of the numbers and half of the abbreviations that you put up there even mean.
Originally posted by callat703:it's the most accurate way to determine a player's "value" to his team that i could come up with using the yahoo statistics … i'd really like to include defensive stats, but most of the major stats (fielding %, errors, etc) are just not indicative of overall defensive play, and it's kind of impossible for yahoo to use STATS Inc.'s "Zone Rating" system
Jesus Christ, this is way over my head.
i miss baseball!!!1!1!
Originally posted by vansmack:http://www.930.com/cgi-bin/ubb-cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=009189
Can anybody find last years thread? I wasn't able to find it.
Originally posted by vansmack:1500 seems a bit excessive. I'd split the difference and go to 1400?
Originally posted by callat703:I would prefer this to be 162 (just to please the baseball gods).
Max Games Played: 170
Max Innings Pitched: 1300
And 1500 Innings if we're doing W, S and H. 1300 is fine if we're not doing holds.
Originally posted by pdx pollard:Thanks. I defer all my thoughts on scoring to this previous thread. I would also add holds.
http://www.930.com/cgi-bin/ubb-cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=009189
Originally posted by BookerT:same here
yes, my hockey team sucks. i keep forgetting it exists, and i'm sorry about that, because i know there's nothing worse than a lazy owner
Originally posted by callat703:OPS! although i didnt win this argument last year, and i doubt people have come around to the dark side in just one year
Thoughts?
Originally posted by HoyaParanoia:I've meant to apologize to you for that for a while now. My solid argument about Barry Bonds ruining OPS for everybody never came to fruition.
OPS! although i didnt win this argument last year, and i doubt people have come around to the dark side in just one year
Originally posted by HoyaParanoia:How about AVG and OPS instead of BB?
Originally posted by callat703:OPS! although i didnt win this argument last year, and i doubt people have come around to the dark side in just one year
Thoughts?
Originally posted by vansmack:oh well, not your fault he didn't play … but i'm still not convinced the argument holds water even if he was in
I've meant to apologize to you for that for a while now. My solid argument about Barry Bonds ruining OPS for everybody never came to fruition.
Originally posted by vansmack:explain again why on earth we'd want to have AVG and OBP?
Anyhow, I think I'd rather see AVG and either OPS or OBP instead of BB. I like to reward those that get HBP too.
Originally posted by vansmack:the more innings, the better to me. i ran out of IP last year in one league i was in. it kind of sucked. there were like 2-3 weeks left in the season too!
Originally posted by callat703:I would prefer this to be 162 (just to please the baseball gods).
Max Games Played: 170
Max Innings Pitched: 1300
And 1500 Innings if we're doing W, S and H. 1300 is fine if we're not doing holds.
Originally posted by HoyaParanoia:Not OBP; I'm talking about OPS - combining slugging and on base percentage.
Originally posted by vansmack:oh well, not your fault he didn't play … but i'm still not convinced the argument holds water even if he was in
I've meant to apologize to you for that for a while now. My solid argument about Barry Bonds ruining OPS for everybody never came to fruition.
Originally posted by vansmack:explain again why on earth we'd want to have AVG and OBP?
Anyhow, I think I'd rather see AVG and either OPS or OBP instead of BB. I like to reward those that get HBP too.
Originally posted by HoyaParanoia:I can't really. I just didn't like BB as it's own category.
explain again why on earth we'd want to have AVG and OBP?
Originally posted by vansmack:I personally like BB as an individual category when coupled with AVG. I recognize it may not be as great as OPS or OBP in valuing players. But it allows you to draft a bit more strategically. Gives certain players some more value, and trims value from others.
Originally posted by HoyaParanoia:I can't really. I just didn't like BB as it's own category.
explain again why on earth we'd want to have AVG and OBP?
I'm impartial to OBP or OPS, but considering AVG makes up over 90% of one category and HR plus AVG makes up a good percentage of the other, in a HR only league, I really don't think one is that much better than the other.