IF YOU CARE

Originally posted by chaz:
Lemme lay it out for ya. No one here is scared by your crackpot theory. The reason this thread's seen so much activity is we like to read your silly arguments and we like to call you you a whacko and make fun of you. We make fun of it because it is funny. Really….we're laughing not to hide fear but because we're amused by you.

[/QB]

Not taking sides on either side of this discussion/piss take of someone with opinions other than theirs…..BUT…..I bet many years ago people took the piss out of anyone who dared say they'd land someone on the moon one day.

Originally posted by O'Mankie:
Not taking sides on either side of this discussion/piss take of someone with opinions other than theirs…..BUT…..I bet many years ago people took the piss out of anyone who dared say they'd land someone on the moon one day.

C'mon man! Everyone knows the lunar landings were a hoax!

Originally posted by Barcelona:

Originally posted by chaz:
I don't claim to speak for the masses at all. What I've said has been stated over and over again by many others. If other people buy into this theory then speak up. I guess I'm not outside of the box on this one. You got me there. And it's not my intent to bully. Hell, I like this thread and encourage this guy to keep it coming. But if he's gonna sit there and say I'm scared cuz deep down that i belive his theory that the government is "painting the sky white", well I'm going to tell him that I think he's quite mistaken in his assertions.

Originally posted by Jaguär:
Over 8,000 registered users here and there's always the bully contingent who claim that they speak for the masses. And it is always those who can't or refuse to think outside of the box who are always the biggest bullies. When it comes down to it, I would assume that there are as varied beliefs on the subject as our differences in taste of music.

I believe Jaguar was completely off on this one, didn't even need to answer her post.

Actually, you are one of the top people whom I was targeting. You, who delight in tearing Americans apart for our so-called lack of tolerance and diversity yet you can't seem to phatom or accept that there may be vast differences of opinion, and not necessarily one extreme or the other. But, of course, I would expect nothing less from you who think that we are all George Bush. :D

Jag hearts Mankie.

Originally posted by Jaguär:
The only other person with real balls here is O'Mankie! He doesn't eat your spoon-fed shit and doesn't succumb to your bully bully tactics as easily as most sheeple or doves.

:roll:

Where is rabble, anyhow?

I think Rabbles real failing is in finding a good consistant reason in painting the sky white.

It is widely accepted that contrails can lead to cloud formation. That in itself is not particularly sinister. But the instead of giving one or two good motives for seeding clouds he pushes out six half baked reasons including Nazi scientists…

Say pick on one reason…. Radar. Well what is the use of ultra sensitive radar over your own airspace? Surely you need ultra-sensitive radar over someone elses's airspace. Plus dumping tonnes of chemicals into the air to accomplish something that worked perfectly fine without the tonnes of chemicals is just odd.


A good conspiracy theory, like any good crime needs a good motive.

Originally posted by Jaguär:

Originally posted by Barcelona:

Originally posted by chaz:
I don't claim to speak for the masses at all. What I've said has been stated over and over again by many others. If other people buy into this theory then speak up. I guess I'm not outside of the box on this one. You got me there. And it's not my intent to bully. Hell, I like this thread and encourage this guy to keep it coming. But if he's gonna sit there and say I'm scared cuz deep down that i belive his theory that the government is "painting the sky white", well I'm going to tell him that I think he's quite mistaken in his assertions.

Originally posted by Jaguär:
Over 8,000 registered users here and there's always the bully contingent who claim that they speak for the masses. And it is always those who can't or refuse to think outside of the box who are always the biggest bullies. When it comes down to it, I would assume that there are as varied beliefs on the subject as our differences in taste of music.

I believe Jaguar was completely off on this one, didn't even need to answer her post.

Actually, you are one of the top people whom I was targeting. You, who delight in tearing Americans apart for our so-called lack of tolerance and diversity yet you can't seem to phatom or accept that there may be vast differences of opinion, and not necessarily one extreme or the other. But, of course, I would expect nothing less from you who think that we are all George Bush. :D

Jaguar, is everything ok?

Originally posted by Jaguär:

On the oppossing side, it seems that GGW is about the only one who is presenting a fair arguement without resulting to emotional name calling. Of course, he hasn't completely convinced me but he makes a fair case, as does Rabble.

Rabble, what kind of music do you like? :D

ugh.

this is my first comment on this thread (i think).

jaguar:

this guy is a nut. plain and simple. he has a psychological disorder that makes him predisposed to accepting conspiracy theories and scaring himself, like a compulsive gambler or something.

he's not being ridiculed for promoting some intellectual idea, he's being (rightly) ridiculed for buying into the conspiracy slop out there on the internet. people aren't engaging him in conversation about contrails because it's useless. it would be like if we had a discussion about the plane that crashed into the pentagon (was it really a jet?!)

if you're suckered into believing all this internet conspiracy theory crap, you're a nut-job, period.

and if you ignore it, it will go away.

Originally posted by HoyaSaxa03:

Originally posted by Jaguär:

On the oppossing side, it seems that GGW is about the only one who is presenting a fair arguement without resulting to emotional name calling. Of course, he hasn't completely convinced me but he makes a fair case, as does Rabble.

Rabble, what kind of music do you like? :D

ugh.

this is my first comment on this thread (i think).

jaguar:

this guy is a nut. plain and simple. he has a psychological disorder that makes him predisposed to accepting conspiracy theories and scaring himself, like a compulsive gambler or something.

he's not being ridiculed for promoting some intellectual idea, he's being (rightly) ridiculed for buying into the conspiracy slop out there on the internet. people aren't engaging him in conversation about contrails because it's useless. it would be like if we had a discussion about the plane that crashed into the pentagon (was it really a jet?!)

if you're suckered into believing all this internet conspiracy theory crap, you're a nut-job, period.

and if you ignore it, it will go away.

And where are all of your credentials and Q class security clearances that prove your beliefs to be right? Who died and gave you all knowledge of all that goes on in this world?

It's funny how all someone has to do is accuse someone of being a conspiracy theorist and many people who haven't done the research or don't know any better automatically believe that every possible thing that person has said is wrong. The other funny thing is that there have been times when some of these conspiracy things pan out to be true. But it's just easier for all the good sheeple to ride along on the bandwagon and continue to eat up all the sheeple shit that's being fed to them.

Just for the record, I don't necessarily believe everything he's stated but I'm not walking around with blinders on either. Also, if some of these are chemtrails as oppossed to contrails, I'm not completely convinced either that it is necessarily to be used against us. I know that there is some belief that it is being used to help cover up the hole in the ozone layer or to protect us from some very strong solar flares. I honestly don't know but refuse to align myself with all the naysayers who really know nothing whatsover about the subject but immediately attack just because they have been conditioned to be good little don't ask but follow lambs.

Who is this MARKLE guy, and do you think he meant to write MARBLE? :D

As long as Rabble's keeping this craziness in one thread now, I'm indifferent. When it looked like he might start thread after thread with all the same 'warnings,' my patience was wearing thin.

Now, back to the discussion at hand – Jag, you think there's a conspiracy to control the weather?!? Or should I say control the world through the weather?

Wow, I like the way she thinks.

Originally posted by Bags:
Now, back to the discussion at hand – Jag, you think there's a conspiracy to control the weather?!? Or should I say control the world through the weather?

Bags, you're getting off track. It's all about the chemtrails. I'm not going any further on that. Way too complex and I don't fucking know! Reread my last paragraph, and yes, I do know what I'm talking about.

And I agree with you about keeping it to one thread. He didn't help his case at all spamming the place like crazy.

I don't believe in leprechauns.

BUT if I ever run into one, I will have to accept what my senses are telling me, before he tricks me and steals all my gold.

Originally posted by RabbleRouser:
I don't believe in leprechauns.

BUT if I ever run into one, I will have to accept what my senses are telling me, before he tricks me and steals all my gold.

Just be careful. According to O'Mankie, if you are American, he'll kick the shit out of you before he steals all of your gold.

Thank you George Bush and those others involved!
I think Homeland Security means that if we want to be secure, we better just keep our asses at home!

AND IT IS NOT UP FOR ARGUMENT that the pentagon wants to "own the weather by 2025."

Oh, God.

Rabble, give them a little time. They aren't ready for you here.

So, you never have answered Dupek and I. What kind of music do you like? :D

Originally posted by RabbleRouser:
AND IT IS NOT UP FOR ARGUMENT that the pentagon wants to "own the weather by 2025."

And have you heard about HAARP?

www.haarp.com/main.html

And have you read State Of Fear?

Originally posted by Taipei Personality:

Originally posted by RabbleRouser:
AND IT IS NOT UP FOR ARGUMENT that the pentagon wants to "own the weather by 2025."

And have you heard about HAARP?

I had thought about that and almost noted it in my rant but decided to keep my mouth, or fingers, shut.

I have no doubt at all that Rabble is very familiar with those.

official govt. HAARP site

Jag, did you read Crichton's book?

Not yet. Have you? If so, is it any good?

Oh, and thanks for the link. I've been on that site a couple of times. It's pretty interesting. I like the Nick Begich site too. I've heard lots of interesting interviews with him and he's pretty compeling and states a pretty good case. Have you read his book "Angels Don't Play That HAARP" yet? I still haven't gotten around to that one though I keep promising myself to read it.