grotty
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Tarantino
November 05, 2003 at 05:12 PM UTC
#
I really liked Kill Bill.
It has it flaws though-
At first I was confused about the lack of background given and reasoning, but I think you pretty quickly get all the info you need. Plus the screwed up timeline is standard Tarantino.
The major complaint I'd have is the almost comic book like use of blood throughout. Maybe that's what really happens when someones arm is cut off but I thought it only served to make the scenes appear silly. I read somewhere that it was intentional to lighten the mood. I guess it worked because it takes very nasty situations and made them almost funny. I would have left out the silly stuff & dramatically increased the power of the film a la Resevoir Dogs. There's no mood lightener in the ear removal scene.
I did think it was one of the most beautifully filmed movies I have ever seen:
The snowy garden fight scene - the blue silhouetted fight scene - excellent use of color throughout.
markie
Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 13178
Re: Tarantino
November 05, 2003 at 05:18 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by grotty:
I really liked Kill Bill.
Plus the screwed up timeline is standard Tarantino.
The snowy garden fight scene - the blue silhouetted fight scene - excellent use of color throughout.
the timeline is somewhat heavy handed having to introduce it with chapter #s scribbled out. A movie should be able to speak for itself not need written description. Oh it make me mad <img src="
http://www.quiethorizons.com/products/full/24464.jpg" alt=" - " />
And the fight scene backdrops were just too street fighter 2.
do you live in a cultural vacuum?
grotty
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Tarantino
November 05, 2003 at 05:30 PM UTC
#
"do you live in a cultural vacuum? "
Why? because I haven't seen Charlie's Angels?
***********************
Tom Savini - a good old Pittsburgh boy.
A couple of years ago on Halloween night we saw his stage production of Dracula. You can just imagine what it was like.
kosmo
Joined: September 23, 1999 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 16329
Re: Tarantino
November 05, 2003 at 05:37 PM UTC
#
i know we are suppose to suspend disbelief at the movies but… she spends x number of hours in the guys truck she just killed recovering use of her limbs. and no one finds her? even a rent-a-cop from the hospital would have known to go the victims truck first, seeing as his keys were missing.
Re: Tarantino
November 05, 2003 at 05:52 PM UTC
#
So then, you don't suspend disbelief when you read comix? How do you know it was hours? It could've been seconds.
markie
Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 13178
Re: Tarantino
November 05, 2003 at 05:59 PM UTC
#
Actually it was captioned…. 13(or 11) hours later…..
Captioning and written descriptions in movies drive me up the wall.
More disbelief is that she can move her upper body but not lower…. After a year in a coma you atrophy so badly it takes months to walk again, not hours.
markie
Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 13178
Re: Tarantino
November 05, 2003 at 06:10 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by Dupek Chopra:
Maybe Q solves it in a flashback in Pt.2?
Maybe it was just a really silly movie?
markie
Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 13178
Re: Tarantino
November 05, 2003 at 09:51 PM UTC
#
I take my entertainment seriously. If I had not got such high hopes for it, I would have probably rated it higher.
But all the same: <img src="
http://www.just4yucks.com/images/general/21047.jpg" alt=" - " />
markie
Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 13178
Re: Tarantino
November 05, 2003 at 10:30 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by mankie:
I do like his movies though, and I think every movie he's made has been brilliant.
he is a prat and so are you for thinking that.
Goodnight.
Re: Tarantino
November 06, 2003 at 03:04 PM UTC
#
I'd like to give a shizzle-out to my homeboy…