Originally posted by Epstein:No they don't…they just live for the 'now'. Well the real punks back in the 70's and early 80's did anyway.
Originally posted by 47 YEAR OLD VIRGIN:a real punk tries to keep their gear to play another show…
Originally posted by HoyaSaxa03:A real punk smashes his own gear….
Originally posted by 47 YEAR OLD VIRGIN:while i'm obviously not inside his head, jay made it pretty clear that his concern about the lack of security was for his gear, not his person … and at that point it seems as though his gear was already destroyed, so it didn't really matter much
Why add fuel to the fire by punching one of the overzealous fans, or kicking one off the stage if your concern is lack of security?
and that doesn't change the fact that, as usual, you completely missed the point of this before you went off on some bizarre rant
BTW….when did I 'rant'?
tis tis Jay Reatard..pretty punk rock dude
dude, you realize the sex pistols were the 1970s UK version of a boy band, right? i mean, maybe they spat at people and did drugs, but they were the creation of a guy who sold overpriced bondage gear and named the band basically as an advertisement for his store. they made a great album and left their footprint on the music world and it's better for that, but to hold them up as some bastion of punk holiness is just laughable. they were just a bunch of blokes who took good advantage of opportunities, for about a year or so.
Originally posted by 47 YEAR OLD VIRGIN:ask greg ginn that…pretty sure the first 4 years wasnt the only out put he want black flag to see
Originally posted by Epstein:No they don't…they just live for the 'now'. Well the real punks back in the 70's and early 80's did anyway.
Originally posted by 47 YEAR OLD VIRGIN:a real punk tries to keep their gear to play another show…
Originally posted by HoyaSaxa03:A real punk smashes his own gear….
Originally posted by 47 YEAR OLD VIRGIN:while i'm obviously not inside his head, jay made it pretty clear that his concern about the lack of security was for his gear, not his person … and at that point it seems as though his gear was already destroyed, so it didn't really matter much
Why add fuel to the fire by punching one of the overzealous fans, or kicking one off the stage if your concern is lack of security?
and that doesn't change the fact that, as usual, you completely missed the point of this before you went off on some bizarre rant
BTW….when did I 'rant'?
Originally posted by 47 YEAR OLD VIRGIN:So did the hippies, dude.
Originally posted by Epstein:No they don't…they just live for the 'now'. Well the real punks back in the 70's and early 80's did anyway.
Originally posted by 47 YEAR OLD VIRGIN:a real punk tries to keep their gear to play another show…
Originally posted by HoyaSaxa03:A real punk smashes his own gear….
Originally posted by 47 YEAR OLD VIRGIN:while i'm obviously not inside his head, jay made it pretty clear that his concern about the lack of security was for his gear, not his person … and at that point it seems as though his gear was already destroyed, so it didn't really matter much
Why add fuel to the fire by punching one of the overzealous fans, or kicking one off the stage if your concern is lack of security?
and that doesn't change the fact that, as usual, you completely missed the point of this before you went off on some bizarre rant
BTW….when did I 'rant'?
No they don't…they just live for the 'now'. Well the real punks back in the 70's and early 80's did anyway.man, you're fucking clueless. way to break down an ambiguous and complex term into the most predictable cliche. you think wire and gang of four and the pop group had that attitude? robert quine of the voidoids or paul strummer would've booted some bitchass off the stage for stomping on their gear.
besides, who's calling jay reatard punk anyway? even sloppy garage-rock musicians need their space to do their thing.
The person who started the thread called him punk rock.
Originally posted by snailhook:
No they don't…they just live for the 'now'. Well the real punks back in the 70's and early 80's did anyway.man, you're fucking clueless. way to break down an ambiguous and complex term into the most predictable cliche. you think wire and gang of four and the pop group had that attitude? robert quine of the voidoids or paul strummer would've booted some bitchass off the stage for stomping on their gear.
besides, who's calling jay reatard punk anyway? even sloppy garage-rock musicians need their space to do their thing.
Originally posted by snailhook:I give up…I really do give up, read the opening comment of this thread YOU FUCKING WANKER
No they don't…they just live for the 'now'. Well the real punks back in the 70's and early 80's did anyway.man, you're fucking clueless. way to break down an ambiguous and complex term into the most predictable cliche. you think wire and gang of four and the pop group had that attitude? robert quine of the voidoids or paul strummer would've booted some bitchass off the stage for stomping on their gear.
besides, who's calling jay reatard punk anyway? even sloppy garage-rock musicians need their space to do their thing.