redsock
Joined: February 20, 2002 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1893
BigYawn.net
January 05, 2004 at 03:23 PM UTC
#
Ok, so there's this website I've sorta created, with some help from a bunch of folks, including some other 9:30 board members. Some you will recognize immediatly, other's you won't. Anyway, the gist, my idea, is for this site to work as a linch-pin for a community of folks in DC, who simply love good music. Whether you're a local musician, or just one of us, a devoted fan, the site should appeal to some part of you.
Not that I want to take away anything away from the board, but this is a bit different as you'll see. So go check it out, I'm curious to hear what you all will think about it (and nervous at the same time). And if you like it, and want to contribute something, let me know.
PS- lots of time and effort went into this, so be gentle, ok?
http://www.bigyawn.net
thirsty moore
Joined: January 11, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 6131
Re: BigYawn.net
January 05, 2004 at 04:16 PM UTC
#
Great site.
Markie starts everyone of his columns/reviews with the word "Well".
Random Citizen
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: BigYawn.net
January 05, 2004 at 04:22 PM UTC
#
Good site, thanks for the head's up on Phantom Planet. One suggestion: Before posting, review the site's content for spelling errors.
bags
Joined: October 30, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 8545
Re: BigYawn.net
January 05, 2004 at 04:24 PM UTC
#
Ditto on Phantom news…I'm super swamped today at work, so only took a *quick* look, but look forward to visiting over there again.
Good luck!!
redsock
Joined: February 20, 2002 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1893
Re: BigYawn.net
January 05, 2004 at 04:27 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by Random Citizen:
Good site, thanks for the head's up on Phantom Planet. One suggestion: Before posting, review the site's content for spelling errors.
Yeah, that's why I try not to be proofing text at 4 in the morning. Very unprofessional. But thanks for the slap, I needed to wake up.
godsshoeshine
Joined: September 18, 2003 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4826
Re: BigYawn.net
January 05, 2004 at 04:41 PM UTC
#
local band page seems like a super neat idea
mankie
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: BigYawn.net
January 05, 2004 at 05:30 PM UTC
#
Dumb question…(does mankie ask any other kind of question I hear whisered in the back row?)
Why BigYawn? Doesn't that present somewhat negative connotations, like it's boring or something…which it isn't. I had a quick visit and agreed with the B&S review by the way.
Dandy01
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: BigYawn.net
January 05, 2004 at 05:46 PM UTC
#
Nice site; I'll be checking back. Anybody know why Jason S. left PP?
redsock
Joined: February 20, 2002 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1893
Re: BigYawn.net
January 05, 2004 at 06:36 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by mankie:
Dumb question…(does mankie ask any other kind of question I hear whisered in the back row?)
Why BigYawn? Doesn't that present somewhat negative connotations, like it's boring or something…which it isn't. I had a quick visit and agreed with the B&S review by the way.
ummm…there is a simple and complicated explanation. The latter is that it is often a lack of oxygen that causes people to yawn. I.E., they need more oxygen. The analogy is that we need more good music. The former is that I yawn a lot.
redsock
Joined: February 20, 2002 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1893
Re: BigYawn.net
January 05, 2004 at 06:48 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by mankie:
Originally posted by redsock:
Originally posted by mankie:
Dumb question…(does mankie ask any other kind of question I hear whisered in the back row?)
Why BigYawn? Doesn't that present somewhat negative connotations, like it's boring or something…which it isn't. I had a quick visit and agreed with the B&S review by the way.
ummm…there is a simple and complicated explanation. The latter is that it is often a lack of oxygen that causes people to yawn. I.E., they need more oxygen. The analogy is that we need more good music. The former is that I yawn a lot.
Clever!
Why do we yawn we see other people yawn?
There is a study that says we do that because we care about them. If someone we don't care about yawns, we don't yawn. Wish I could find where I read this.
grotty
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: BigYawn.net
January 05, 2004 at 06:54 PM UTC
#
Good stuff - I bookmarked it.
It's going to take a lot of work to keep it up-to-date though.
What's the CD rating system? Obviously Z's, but what's the rank? 1-10? 10 being good? (Nevermind - I found the BY-RATING page…)
***************
Defintely give it another quick proof though
i.e., on the By Rating page:
Title for Death Cab is wrong
Ryan Adams RnR part 2 is listed twice
chaz
Joined: December 09, 2002 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5111
Re: BigYawn.net
January 05, 2004 at 06:59 PM UTC
#
Site looks great! One suggestion though…you might want to think about sizing the site for an 800x600 screen size. Tons of people (at least 50% i'd say) use this resolution, especially us older gents who don't see quite like we did when we were 16!
With my screen res set to 800x600 i have to use the scroll bars at the bottom to see the right margin of the page.
Hope this was gentle enough…and congrats!
redsock
Joined: February 20, 2002 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1893
Re: BigYawn.net
January 05, 2004 at 07:07 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by chaz:
Site looks great! One suggestion though…you might want to think about sizing the site for an 800x600 screen size. Tons of people (at least 50% i'd say) use this resolution, especially us older gents who don't see quite like we did when we were 16!
With my screen res set to 800x600 i have to use the scroll bars at the bottom to see the right margin of the page.
Hope this was gentle enough…and congrats!
no more proofing after 1, no more proofing after 1!!! Damn it! Thanks, their fixed.
ratioci nation
Joined: November 22, 2002 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4463
Re: BigYawn.net
January 05, 2004 at 07:32 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by chaz:
One suggestion though…you might want to think about sizing the site for an 800x600 screen size. Tons of people (at least 50% i'd say) use this resolution, especially us older gents who don't see quite like we did when we were 16!
Estimated at about 42%, but there is no exact number really - trends are discussed here -
http://www.upsdell.com/BrowserNews/stat_trends.htm
redsock
Joined: February 20, 2002 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1893
Re: BigYawn.net
January 05, 2004 at 07:46 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by pollard:
Originally posted by chaz:
One suggestion though…you might want to think about sizing the site for an 800x600 screen size. Tons of people (at least 50% i'd say) use this resolution, especially us older gents who don't see quite like we did when we were 16!
Estimated at about 42%, but there is no exact number really - trends are discussed here - http://www.upsdell.com/BrowserNews/stat_trends.htm.
That link doesn't seem to work
ratioci nation
Joined: November 22, 2002 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4463
Re: BigYawn.net
January 05, 2004 at 07:56 PM UTC
#
try again, the board added the period as part of the link
chaz
Joined: December 09, 2002 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5111
Re: BigYawn.net
January 05, 2004 at 08:40 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by pollard:
Originally posted by chaz:
One suggestion though…you might want to think about sizing the site for an 800x600 screen size. Tons of people (at least 50% i'd say) use this resolution, especially us older gents who don't see quite like we did when we were 16!
Estimated at about 42%, but there is no exact number really - trends are discussed here - http://www.upsdell.com/BrowserNews/stat_trends.htm
Not a bad guess then, i'd say.