grammy awards

<img src="http://graphics7.nytimes.com/images/2004/02/10/arts/10GRAM.184.jpg" alt=" - " />

At the after parties….beauty and the beast? Dumb and dumber? Ho and….ho on drugs and past her prime?

<img src="http://www.home.zonnet.nl/de_vries579/john-wayne-gacy/gacy0005.jpg" alt=" - " />
<img src="http://www.gweilodiaries.com/archives/Murderer.bmp" alt=" - " />

Originally posted by sonickteam2:

and i would bet my ass is ALMOST as nice as hers. ask markie, he likes it. [/QB]

I bet your arse can't even come close to Celeste's arse…..I'd like to come close to Celeste's arse though I must admit. ;)

Why must we objectivise people, especially loved ones, to just body parts?

Sonick, I am sure all of you is lovely, apart from the silly goatee.

Does this mean there will be no more board references to Samantha's lovely breasts?

Originally posted by mark e smith:
Why must we objectivise people, especially loved ones, to just body parts?

Sonick, I am sure all of you is lovely, apart from the silly goatee.

Originally posted by Rutherford J. Balls:
Does this mean there will be no more board references to Samantha's lovely breasts?

[Sonick, I am sure all of you is lovely, apart from the silly goatee.

[/QB]

I was being sarcastic, wasn't it obvious? (who do I sound like now?)

Originally posted by mark e smith:
Why must we objectivise people, especially loved ones, to just body parts?

Sonick, I am sure all of you is lovely, apart from the silly goatee.

But doesn't it tickle your balls and add to the experience?

Originally posted by mankie:

Originally posted by mark e smith:
Why must we objectivise people, especially loved ones, to just body parts?

Sonick, I am sure all of you is lovely, apart from the silly goatee.

But doesn't it tickle your balls and add to the experience?

you mean his "ball"

i thought you knew?