Rhett Miller
Joined: November 15, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 17762
Re: 2004 Rock'n Roll Hall of Fame Nominees
November 21, 2003 at 04:29 PM UTC
#
A long narrative on what a wonderful artist Bob Seger is "intelligent"? Dude, I posted that review out of sarcasm. Get with the program, boy.
Originally posted by Dupek Chopra:
Originally posted by Rhett Miller:
Sorry I don't fit your standards. It's a chatboard, not a work project.
This presumes that whenever someone reads anything Rhett posts possessing anything even remotely intelligent, they have to wonder: Is it Rhett, or is it Memorex? The standard answer shall be, "Google it first".
Celeste
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: 2004 Rock'n Roll Hall of Fame Nominees
November 21, 2003 at 04:58 PM UTC
#
I guess the jury is still out with this board on whether I wear the pants or am the "yes man"…
How suspenseful!
Rhett Miller
Joined: November 15, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 17762
Re: 2004 Rock'n Roll Hall of Fame Nominees
November 21, 2003 at 05:06 PM UTC
#
If a post of mine about music has more than three sentences to it, 99.9% of the time it's lifted from the internet. Though work affords me the opportunity to post short, not well thought out comments about music or whatever, I generally don't have the time to play amateur music critic like some board folks.
I guess the examples you give in how to behave cryptically and often nonsensically are sinking in, and I am turning into you Mr Dupe!
Re: 2004 Rock'n Roll Hall of Fame Nominees
November 21, 2003 at 05:12 PM UTC
#
There you go changing the subject again. You committed one of your endless breaches of netiquette. I called you on it. End of story.
Instead of gracefully falling on your sword, you pull a Sean Hannity:
<Rhett>"When found in the wrong, steer the topic away from Rhett."</Rhett>
kosmo
Joined: September 23, 1999 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 16329
Re: 2004 Rock'n Roll Hall of Fame Nominees
November 21, 2003 at 05:23 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by Rhett Miller:
Dude, Seger put Motown on the musical map.
I think Motown put Motown on the musical map :p
Not defending Mr Segar, but being in High School during the time when Live Bullet ruled the Detroit Radio Waves it was hard not to be exposed to his music. "Night Moves" was a bit like Pet Sounds for me. I even caught a sow at one his historic 6 night stands concerts at Cobo Hall. Of course fast forward to college and really discovering new wave completely erased the memories of the Silver Bullet Band…
I suspect if one digs around in his early indie releases you'll find one or two classic tracks, "Heavy Music" being one great track. Of course he also released under the name Beach Bums, the anti-war protester song "Ballad of the Yellow Beret". He was airing his displeasure with the Vietnam draft dodgers of the time. The song was forced off the market by Barry Sadler.
Rhett Miller
Joined: November 15, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 17762
Re: 2004 Rock'n Roll Hall of Fame Nominees
November 21, 2003 at 06:24 PM UTC
#
What is this netiquette crap you speak of?
First they want to regulate a woman's right to choose. Then they want to regulate who can get married. Now they even want to regulate how people post things on informal net chat boards.
Whatever happened to good old punk rock anarchy? Let's smash these silly rules people are trying to apply to internet chatboards.
Being punk rock shouldn't be limited to reading back issues of Maximum Rock and Roll and wearing $250 John Paul Gautier sweaters with your Doc Martens. Punk rock should be about smashing the rules and regulations that society puts on us, goddamnit!
Originally posted by Dupek Chopra:
There you go changing the subject again. You committed one of your endless breaches of netiquette. I called you on it. End of story.
Instead of gracefully falling on your sword, you pull a Sean Hannity:
<Rhett>"When found in the wrong, steer the topic away from Rhett."</Rhett>
flawd101
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: 2004 Rock'n Roll Hall of Fame Nominees
November 22, 2003 at 08:14 PM UTC
#
that good old punk is dead….. :(
and "bitch!" would have sounded right after the sandwitch part…
RatBastard
Joined: January 07, 2003 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 2955
Re: 2004 Rock'n Roll Hall of Fame Nominees
November 23, 2003 at 06:03 PM UTC
#
Bob Seger: Token low talent performer to make other that are such thikn they actually have a shot. He player the pop music of his era at best. His music is the type that every time I hear it I quickly remember why I own none of his CDs.
Sir HC
Joined: August 31, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4059
Re: 2004 Rock'n Roll Hall of Fame Nominees
November 24, 2003 at 02:10 PM UTC
#
From the list:
The 5 Royales - Never heard of, seem to be this years token 50's band.
Black Sabbath - Should be there, their music has stood the test of time.
Jackson Browne - As a musician or for writing. IIRC he co-wrote some Eagles classics like Running on Empty and was on the Simpsons (not sure if that is a plus anymore). Musically, had a good run for about 10 years. Positive, recorded live from Merriweather, negative, almost caused the collapse of College Park concerts (SEE Productions) with his show there.
The Dells - Another 50s group that has been forgotten.
George Harrison - As a soloist I guess he did some big stuff in the early 70s, but really not that much, if he didn't die recently and wasn't a Beatle first I doubt he would have made it. Remember he is already in as a Beatle.
Lynyrd Skynyrd - They should be there, not my music, but heck they have a genre that they helped create.
John Cougar Mellencamp - I don't really think he belongs. If he makes it why not every other pop thing (e.g. Brian Adams).
The O'Jays - Disco sucks.
Gram Parsons - As a musician or producer? As the latter I would be for it as the former, not really.
Prince - Of course. He has done so much, and is the only real competition to Michael Jackson in the quirkiness field.
Bob Seger - Bleh. I guess my problem is that his music has not aged well, sure it was popular back in the 70s but so what, other than Chevy commercials what has survived of his legacy?
The Sex Pistols - Glen Matlock was at the Hall of Fame this summer for something so why not. They deserve to be there, as their is already a display that is almost all them at the place.
Patti Smith - On the fence here. Maybe she should maybe not. Has some great songs, was big in the punk movement, and still can kick it out. Would rather it be the whole group as Lenny Kay is the man.
The Stooges - Should be there.
Traffic - Another act whose music has faded. Really see them as just another band.
ZZ Top - They should be there. They rock, they have a unique sound that is very recognized, and they like hot rods.
Been to the museum once, and what amazes me is how some of these artists above have big displays already, so what does the induction do above that?
skeeter
Joined: May 29, 2003 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4011
Re: 2004 Rock'n Roll Hall of Fame Nominees
November 24, 2003 at 07:19 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by Sir HC:
From the list:
George Harrison - As a soloist I guess he did some big stuff in the early 70s, but really not that much, if he didn't die recently and wasn't a Beatle first I doubt he would have made it. Remember he is already in as a Beatle.
[snip]
The Stooges - Should be there.
I'm not really sure Harrison should be in there as a solo artist. I like his solo stuff (what I've heard), but was it really important or influential enough to put him in the hall of fame? If they're gonna put him in, they're going to have to put Ringo in too, and that's gonna have a lot of people chuckling.
It's a crime The Stooges aren't in there yet.