The Mitchell Report

Originally posted by Brain Walrus:
Who was the hee-haw they called Big Mac? I don't recognize his name on the list.
<img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/e8/Mac_Tonight.PNG" alt=" - " />
Originally posted by vansmack:
Maybe I should be happy the Angels didn't get Miggy on Tuesday - it does explain his '07 numbers.
The Orioles finally did something right for a change.
And Canseco was "the big snitch and liar"….he was the only one using and he's just trying to "make him self look better by making up lies about everyone else"…heard all this crap when his book was released….looks like he is one of the very few to actually tell the TRUTH about everything he was involved in….hate him if you like….the guy laid out all his sins on the table….bet he's sleeping a lot better tonight than "The Rocket"……..lol…..
Originally posted by vansmack:
Originally posted by Brain Walrus:
Who was the hee-haw they called Big Mac? I don't recognize his name on the list.
They touched on Mark McGwire in the history section of the report, but Andro at the time was legal and there didn't appear to be credible evidence from BALCO or the other three sources that were willing to talk about supplying McGwire. And his refusal to deny at the Congressional hearing did him in anyway.
Thank you…I can always rely on smackie for an answer without trying to being a smart-arse.
What's the next big report that is of no interest to the vast majority…wether Mike Piazza is gay or not?
Best description I read of the Mitchell Report is 'horsesh*t served up like its cavier.' All hearsay and accusation based on very limited, sketchy sources.
I think it's great that so many people acknowledge that steroids are rampant in MLB, but when their favorite players or teams get named, they get all indignant.
Why is that great?

Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
I think it's great that so many people acknowledge that steroids are rampant in MLB, but when their favorite players or teams get named, they get all indignant.