alex
Joined: October 07, 2003 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 950
Non-smoking shows
October 30, 2006 at 09:04 PM UTC
#
So I've been to three shows in a row now that have been non-smoking "per artist's request."
Has this been happening more and more lately, or is this just purely coincidence that Ben Kweller, Alice in Chains and The Decemberists all requested non-smoking nights within a period of two weeks?
redsock
Joined: February 20, 2002 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1893
Re: Non-smoking shows
October 30, 2006 at 09:14 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by Alex:
So I've been to three shows in a row now that have been non-smoking "per artist's request."
Has this been happening more and more lately, or is this just purely coincidence that Ben Kweller, Alice in Chains and The Decemberists all requested non-smoking nights within a period of two weeks?
As did Tilly and the Wall at the Cat last week.
thingsfallapart
Joined: April 01, 2006 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 340
Re: Non-smoking shows
October 30, 2006 at 09:14 PM UTC
#
Probably pure coincedence. I think artists who request non-smoking shows are pretty lame though. They should get over themselves.
alex
Joined: October 07, 2003 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 950
Re: Non-smoking shows
October 30, 2006 at 09:19 PM UTC
#
Also, what is the word on the city-wide smoking ban? When does that start?
I'm so out of the loop these days.
alex
Joined: October 07, 2003 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 950
Re: Non-smoking shows
October 30, 2006 at 09:20 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by thingsfallapart:
Probably pure coincedence. I think artists who request non-smoking shows are pretty lame though. They should get over themselves.
Perhaps they are allergic to cigarette smoke? Perhaps they aren't allergic, but it negatively affects their performance?
I think I'd rather put on a show at 100% than please a few people that can't handle going without a cigarette for a few hours.
redsock
Joined: February 20, 2002 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1893
Re: Non-smoking shows
October 30, 2006 at 09:25 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by thingsfallapart:
Probably pure coincedence. I think artists who request non-smoking shows are pretty lame though. They should get over themselves.
What is there to get over? Living out of a tour bus/van for three weeks, eating fast food all the time, these things aren't bad enough? Of the four bands mentioned, I'm betting two or three of them deal with this lifestyle. After all that, wanting to not play in a closed up cancer dome is hardly ego-driven. Especially considering many do this on little to no health insurance.
brokensocscene
Joined: December 12, 2005 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 9016
Re: Non-smoking shows
October 30, 2006 at 09:25 PM UTC
#
I think people that smoke inside clubs are f-king selfish. I'm glad about the ban…wish it happened sooner.
gloriaabortion
Joined: March 27, 2006 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 15
Re: Non-smoking shows
October 30, 2006 at 09:27 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by thingsfallapart:
Probably pure coincedence. I think artists who request non-smoking shows are pretty lame though. They should get over themselves.
I think smokers who believe non smokers should just deal with their smoke whenever, wherever need to get over themselves.
terry
Joined: September 17, 2004 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 255
Re: Non-smoking shows
October 30, 2006 at 09:32 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by Alex:
Has this been happening more and more lately, or is this just purely coincidence that Ben Kweller, Alice in Chains and The Decemberists all requested non-smoking nights within a period of two weeks?
The only non-smoking show "per artists request" I've been to is the Wedding Present. This article is over a year old but addresses the issue:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/04/28/AR2005042800694_pf.html
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Non-smoking shows
October 30, 2006 at 09:32 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by Alex:
Also, what is the word on the city-wide smoking ban? When does that start?
January 2007
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Non-smoking shows
October 30, 2006 at 09:34 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by thingsfallapart:
I think artists who request non-smoking shows are pretty lame though. They should get over themselves.
I think people who can't go an hour or two without a cigarette are pretty lame. They should get over their addiction.
Shadrach
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Non-smoking shows
October 30, 2006 at 09:34 PM UTC
#
So many major cities have already gone non-smoking that I think the bands are starting to get used to it and in many cases prefer it. Since we try to be artist friendly we honor these requests for non-smoking shows.
personally I think all the non-smoking shows are a good thing. It gives the fans and employees a chance to get used to the ban before it gets enforced.
Venerable Bede
Joined: October 16, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3863
Re: Non-smoking shows
October 30, 2006 at 09:44 PM UTC
#
<obligatory reply>
all of which shows there is no need for government to influence behavior and restrict individuals from making their own choices since its obvious that there is a desire (and market) to have non-smoking shows.
<begin remarks with opposing views>
xcanuck
Joined: November 19, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 648
Re: Non-smoking shows
October 30, 2006 at 09:46 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by Shadrach:
So many major cities have already gone non-smoking that I think the bands are starting to get used to it and in many cases prefer it. Since we try to be artist friendly we honor these requests for non-smoking shows.
personally I think all the non-smoking shows are a good thing. It gives the fans and employees a chance to get used to the ban before it gets enforced.
So how come the Back Bar has been non-smoking on two of the three occassions I've recently been to? And what's the club's policy going to be come Jan 01? Is it going to be feasible to monitor the in/out traffic for smokers?
sch2383
Joined: August 29, 2005 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 41
Re: Non-smoking shows
October 30, 2006 at 10:00 PM UTC
#
I went to Neko Case back in April and that was non-smoking. Of course she is actually allergic to the smoke and you don't want anything messing with that voice.
I really don't care one way or another if the show is smoking or not, but I can understand why non-smoking musicians would ask not to be exposed to clouds of smoke night after night.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Non-smoking shows
October 30, 2006 at 10:05 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by Venerable Bede:
begin remarks with opposing views
Without the lead in California taking a stance as it did 10 years ago (or any other gov for that matter) you know it likely never would have happened with market forces alone. All things are not equal. I'm proud to be part of the example that is spreading across the nation, and the the world for that matter. Nothing the business owners predicted ever happened - profits are not down, people are still going out, and smokers can still go outside to enjoy their addiction. It just stopped affecting me, and it's great!
And yes, I will be voting to increase the cigarette tax 13 cents on each cigarette distributed ($2.60 per pack) in California next week, and I'm not even the slightest bit apologetic for it. Smokers, I'm over you and your so called rights.
ratioci nation
Joined: November 22, 2002 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4463
Re: Non-smoking shows
October 30, 2006 at 10:05 PM UTC
#
I am surprised The Decemberists was non smoking considering I am surprised I didnt get a contact high at their portland show, but that is par for the course it seems at Crystal Ballroom shows.
nkotb
Joined: August 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 6500
Re: Non-smoking shows
October 30, 2006 at 10:09 PM UTC
#
That's a whole lotta surprise!
Originally posted by pdx pollard:
I am surprised The Decemberists was non smoking considering I am surprised I didnt get a contact high at their portland show, but that is par for the course it seems at Crystal Ballroom shows.