just cause Notre Dame hasnt won at Louisville in 50 years….sheesh.
ok, back to pro football, sorry.
ok, back to pro football, sorry.
Shemp wrote:
First off the home team is generally -3 just for being the home team. So -5 isn't that much of a stretch, especially if you watched both teams play this past weekend.
Shemp wrote:
First off the home team is generally -3 just for being the home team. So -5 isn't that much of a stretch, especially if you watched both teams play this past weekend.
Secondly, if you have been following the Ravens since, oh, I don't know, Day 1, you'd realize that Joe Flacco is indeed special. The Ravens have been searching for someone like him forever. Plus the fact that he he's a rookie who played his college ball at unheralded Delaware. With this defense his job has been to limit mistakes and make a play here and there. And he has done just that. Although I feel that they'll need to take the reins off him a bit more in order for them to beat Pittsburgh.
num wrote:i pretty much agree with this, thats pretty much every steelers game though regardless of opponent
The key for a Ravens victory is to play just like Saturday. Run the ball, keep it close and wait for Pittsburgh to make a mistake. If Pittsburgh doesnt make a mistake, well, you wont beat them anyway.
godsshoeshine wrote:
if the ravens are successful in running the ball, keeping it close and not making mistakes thats pretty much out playing the steelers, though
num wrote:
that whole post sounded more like John Madden than Joe Theissman.
Mobius wrote:num wrote:
that whole post sounded more like John Madden than Joe Theissman.
you're right . . . the post was pretty madden-y . . . long-winded and obvious . . . but possibly true, or at least could seem true if you read it while drunk.