wml7
Joined: February 19, 2004 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3064
Re: Super Bowl XLV: Steelers vs. Packers
February 06, 2011 at 08:24 PM UTC
#

;D
James Ford
Joined: July 22, 2009 at 09:02 PM UTC
Posts: 5620
Re: Super Bowl XLV: Steelers vs. Packers
February 07, 2011 at 01:11 AM UTC
#
No cheerleaders, missing seats, a botched national anthem, a flyover with a closed roof, and the Black Eyes Peas. Nice.
wml7
Joined: February 19, 2004 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3064
Re: Super Bowl XLV: Steelers vs. Packers
February 07, 2011 at 01:18 AM UTC
#
I guess other channels don't do short shows anymore competing against the halftime show. Where is that puppy bowl? ;D
godsshoeshine
Joined: September 18, 2003 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4826
Re: Super Bowl XLV: Steelers vs. Packers
February 07, 2011 at 01:17 PM UTC
#
sweetcell is a genius
Seth Hurwitz
Joined: October 02, 1999 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1014
Re: Super Bowl XLV: Steelers vs. Packers
February 07, 2011 at 02:16 PM UTC
#
I don't want to say it was a good day for Pittsburgh-fan haters yesterday, but…
godsshoeshine
Joined: September 18, 2003 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4826
Re: Super Bowl XLV: Steelers vs. Packers
February 07, 2011 at 02:39 PM UTC
#
i'd be more bummed if i knew any packers fans
hearing from skins, ravens, and browns fans makes me feel better honestly
Brian_Walalce
Joined: May 16, 2005 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1484
Re: Super Bowl XLV: Steelers vs. Packers
February 07, 2011 at 02:43 PM UTC
#
To God's Shoeshine:

The sad part is, despite all of their turnovers, the Steelers could have easily won that game. The Packers NEVER finish out opponents. Roethisberger idolized Elway. Maybe he's going to have Elway's Super Bowl career in reverse.
As for the commercials, once again Telaflora made my favorite with the Faith Hill one. I've tried that in real life however and it doesn't work. 9 out 10, slap you, punch you, knee you in the groin…but the 10th one? Magic.
Also, I liked the Pepsi Max "Thoughts on a first date" one, the Kardashian one and the GoDaddy.com one with Jillian Michaels and Danica Patrick (It's a TEASE. It's like Burlesque. It's what they DON'T SHOW.)
The Half-time show? GaGa? The ball is in your court next year.
And as for Ms. Dirrrrrrty. Jeez. It wasn't a good day for people from Pittsburgh fumbling things was it?
Brian
sweetcell
Joined: July 18, 2006 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 22608
Re: Super Bowl XLV: Steelers vs. Packers
February 07, 2011 at 03:15 PM UTC
#
godsshoeshine wrote:
sweetcell is a genius
what have i done now?!?
godsshoeshine
Joined: September 18, 2003 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4826
Re: Super Bowl XLV: Steelers vs. Packers
February 07, 2011 at 03:35 PM UTC
#
sweetcell wrote:
the proclivity of the QBs to throw INTs (well, roethlisberger at least
admitting i was wrong
Thousand Made-Up Loves
Joined: September 14, 2008 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1551
Re: Super Bowl XLV: Steelers vs. Packers
February 07, 2011 at 04:30 PM UTC
#
Mobius wrote:
I predict charles woodson will narrowly edge out lamarr woodley for mvp of my heart.
I despise anyone and anything to do with the University of Michigan, but even I will admit, Charles Woodson is a bad motherfucker. Too bad he got hurt last night. At least my boy Greg Jennings (BA Western Michigan University 2006) made up for it.
Thousand Made-Up Loves
Joined: September 14, 2008 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1551
Re: Super Bowl XLV: Steelers vs. Packers
February 07, 2011 at 04:37 PM UTC
#
I believe the world would be a better place if the Black Eyed Peas were subjected to enhanced interrogation and extraordinary rendition before being indefinitely incarcerated at Guantanamo for crimes against humanity. They are a commercial vehicle with no artistic value, period. They can't sing, they're fucking auto-tuned, they don't play instruments, they write songs specifically for marketers and the lowest common denominator of society and their songs are fucking awful.
I don't specifically despise Pittsburgh natives like I do Philly fans, but I'm glad they lost because they've been irritating the shit out of. Consistent winning will do that. Now when the Caps finish the job and cunt punt the Pens out of the playoffs, I'll feel a lot better.
imrotten
Joined: February 20, 2002 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1089
Re: Super Bowl XLV: Steelers vs. Packers
February 07, 2011 at 04:49 PM UTC
#
I have seen him live,up close, in his natural craft beer habitat……he is indeed a "hopster"…….
ggw wrote:
James Ford is a hopster.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Super Bowl XLV: Steelers vs. Packers
February 07, 2011 at 05:27 PM UTC
#
I can't tell you how much I enjoyed the
Motorola Xoom commercial.
Everything else I washed away with booze…
DeathFromAbove1979
Joined: November 29, 2006 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5038
Re: Super Bowl XLV: Steelers vs. Packers
February 07, 2011 at 09:57 PM UTC
#
I liked the Bud Light remodeling one, simple concept. Beer makes everything better. The kid as Darth Vader, the Faith Hill one. None too hilarious. Way more excited about seeing that Super 8 commercial!!
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Super Bowl XLV: Steelers vs. Packers
February 07, 2011 at 10:47 PM UTC
#
DeathFromAbove1979 wrote:
The kid as Darth Vader, ……Way more excited about seeing that Super 8 commercial!!
This and this. Spielberg and Abrams = chubby.
Brian_Walalce
Joined: May 16, 2005 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1484
Re: Super Bowl XLV: Steelers vs. Packers
February 07, 2011 at 11:01 PM UTC
#
vansmack wrote:
DeathFromAbove1979 wrote:
The kid as Darth Vader, ……Way more excited about seeing that Super 8 commercial!!
This and this. Spielberg and Abrams = chubby.
Ugh! I strongly dislike both so I'm going to ruin the movie for you:
SPOILER!
It's a sequel to Cloverfield.

Brian
DeathFromAbove1979
Joined: November 29, 2006 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5038
Re: Super Bowl XLV: Steelers vs. Packers
February 08, 2011 at 02:11 PM UTC
#
Brian_Wallace wrote:
vansmack wrote:
DeathFromAbove1979 wrote:
The kid as Darth Vader, ……Way more excited about seeing that Super 8 commercial!!
This and this. Spielberg and Abrams = chubby.
Ugh! I strongly dislike both so I'm going to ruin the movie for you:
SPOILER!
It's a sequel to Cloverfield.

Brian
Duh!