I don't recollect posting my disliking Sleigh Bells, I love their albums, I, personally, don't think that Clutch is worse. I think they're miles apart. I'll take a Clutch record/live performance over Sleigh Bells. But again, I do like Sleigh Bells records.
Is there a worse "band" than Sleigh Bells?
The Waterboys. Now there's a band whose music hasn't aged well.
Frank wrote:
The worst band I've ever seen live, without a doubt, is some shyte who supported The Waterboys at Constitution Hall back in the early 80's. "Big Bang Theory" or something like that (they've been blocked out of my memory)
It was just loud noise, literally. By song 3 there was actually more people out in the foyer than in the hall. So I wasn't alone in my opinion.
sleigh bells > tokio hotel
sleigh bells > hollywood undead
if i think, this list can on for awhile.
sleigh bells > hollywood undead
if i think, this list can on for awhile.
James wrote:
The Waterboys. Now there's a band whose music hasn't aged well.Frank wrote:
The worst band I've ever seen live, without a doubt, is some shyte who supported The Waterboys at Constitution Hall back in the early 80's. "Big Bang Theory" or something like that (they've been blocked out of my memory)
It was just loud noise, literally. By song 3 there was actually more people out in the foyer than in the hall. So I wasn't alone in my opinion.
I found there first 3 albums on vinyl recently and those albums still sound fresh. After that they started to suck. "This is the sea" is a great album.
atomicfront wrote:James wrote:
The Waterboys. Now there's a band whose music hasn't aged well.Frank wrote:
The worst band I've ever seen live, without a doubt, is some shyte who supported The Waterboys at Constitution Hall back in the early 80's. "Big Bang Theory" or something like that (they've been blocked out of my memory)
It was just loud noise, literally. By song 3 there was actually more people out in the foyer than in the hall. So I wasn't alone in my opinion.
I found there first 3 albums on vinyl recently and those albums still sound fresh. After that they started to suck. "This is the sea" is a great album.
Waterboys are at their best and very original with their more 'folksey' work. When they try to become a rock band they just become a barely average rock band.
I love "Room to Roam" and "This is the sea". I bought "Rock in a weary land" and was very disapointed.
I'll take Karl Wallinger over Mike Scott any day of the week.
I have a recording of Waterboys' set at the 1986 Glastonbury and the 1-2-3 opening shot of Medicine Bow, Be My Enemy and Maggie's Farm is absolutely incredible. Big, booming and rocking all over the place. I'm going home and playing it tonight.
hutch wrote:
I'll take Karl Wallinger over Mike Scott any day of the week.
Do you mean in the bedroom? I'm sure Mike is okay with that.
World Party was a global success!!!! NOT
Mike Scott's two solo albums are excellent.
Social D
Sigur Ros
Beatles
Afghan Whigs
JAMC
Fugazi
These are the worst bands ever.
Sigur Ros
Beatles
Afghan Whigs
JAMC
Fugazi
These are the worst bands ever.
Frank wrote:hutch wrote:
I'll take Karl Wallinger over Mike Scott any day of the week.
Do you mean in the bedroom? I'm sure Mike is okay with that.
World Party was a global success!!!! NOT
Mike Scott's two solo albums are excellent.
I prefer Goodbye Jumbo over anything the Waterboys put out.. not saying they didn't write some killer songs
I tried with Mike Scott's late 90s album.. can't even remember name… it was so Dylan-derivative it was rather hard to take it seriously.. On the other hand its true that Wallinger is also very derivative..
chaz wrote:
Social D
Sigur Ros
Beatles
Afghan Whigs
JAMC
Fugazi
These are the worst bands ever.
Did somebody turn your clock back to April 1st?
I will defend the Sleigh Bells. Sleigh Bells were great at Coachella 2011.
Their first album was a little more fun than their second, but I like both.
And even if the chick is hot in a trashy way, hot is still hot.
This show does sound like it was kind of mailed in, though.
Their first album was a little more fun than their second, but I like both.
And even if the chick is hot in a trashy way, hot is still hot.
This show does sound like it was kind of mailed in, though.
There is no worse band than the below…
Boston
Metallica
U2
Boston
Metallica
U2
Passion Pit
Jaguar wrote:chaz wrote:
Social D
Sigur Ros
Beatles
Afghan Whigs
JAMC
Fugazi
These are the worst bands ever.
Did somebody turn your clock back to April 1st?
If you're saying overrated, I'm not in total disagreement with you on that list. The biggest ommission would be NIRVANA.
Worst????
can we get back to talking about Mike Trout?
RatBastard wrote:
There is no worse band than the below…
Boston
Metallica
U2
What did you just pick really popular bands?
Jaguar wrote:chaz wrote:
Social D
Sigur Ros
Beatles
Afghan Whigs
JAMC
Fugazi
These are the worst bands ever.
Did somebody turn your clock back to April 1st?
yeah, only band that belongs on that list is afghan wigs.
atomicfront wrote:Jaguar wrote:chaz wrote:
Social D
Sigur Ros
Beatles
Afghan Whigs
JAMC
Fugazi
These are the worst bands ever.
Did somebody turn your clock back to April 1st?
yeah, only band that belongs on that list is afghan wigs.
I like most of these bands I just picked a bunch of bands that people really like and said they suck cuz you know that's how we roll around here.
I could actually care less about any of those bands, except for the Beatles. If you're in your 40's and you say you like Fugazi, you're probably trying just a little too hard.
chaz wrote:atomicfront wrote:Jaguar wrote:chaz wrote:
Social D
Sigur Ros
Beatles
Afghan Whigs
JAMC
Fugazi
These are the worst bands ever.
Did somebody turn your clock back to April 1st?
yeah, only band that belongs on that list is afghan wigs.
I like most of these bands I just picked a bunch of bands that people really like and said they suck cuz you know that's how we roll around here.