El Tee
Joined: October 09, 2003 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3809
Re: Ageing Thread
February 21, 2013 at 12:44 AM UTC
#
James wrote:
I'd lay Helen Mirren, if we were both available and she were game. She's 67.
atomicfront wrote:
According to this chart it is acceptable for me to date an 82 year old woman. That is actually kind of creepy..wait a second that is incredibly creepy.
How come no one is anwering question 2? Were all friends here…no need to be shy.
Some reason Cate Blanchett comes to mind..Turns out she's 43…thought she was older…She's hot. And to put it in perspective, Jennifer Aniston is 40 something and I don't think she looks it. Age is the number, it depends on who you are attracted. If you are focused on age, then I'm guessing your answer is who doesn't look over 40.
Have you been to your high school reunion? That will put your mirrored image in perspective or under analysis.
James Ford
Joined: July 22, 2009 at 09:02 PM UTC
Posts: 5620
Re: Ageing Thread
February 21, 2013 at 01:17 AM UTC
#
Why is it everyone on the 9:30 board considers themselves young looking and hot, then when you actually meet them, they are total dorks (meself included)? Get over yourselves! ;D
wml7
Joined: February 19, 2004 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3064
Re: Ageing Thread
February 21, 2013 at 01:32 AM UTC
#
Yes, it's nice to meet all you dorks
;D
jaguar
Joined: October 28, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3869
Re: Ageing Thread
February 21, 2013 at 03:36 AM UTC
#
^ Except that the same site you source also defines him as a
Baby Boomer, born between 1946 and 1964, which is more the traditional terminology for one born in his era.
fatskippy
Joined: January 04, 2006 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 401
Re: Ageing Thread
February 21, 2013 at 03:40 AM UTC
#
stevewizzle wrote:
not to like, call you stupid or anything, but yeah - you're gen x.
RatBastard wrote:
Its kind of sad but it is almost getting to that. 56 years old and lets see, three surgeries on each knee, four surgeries on my back, two on my right arm, three abdominal surgeries, one crainiotomy, two cranial gamma treatments, multiple eye surgeries (none cosmetic), several broken bones over the years, plus all the normal childhood things. The freakiest for me was when they had to do the steroid injections into my eyeball for bleeding around the optic nerve. Nothing like a hypodermic needle aimed at your eyeball to get you a little nervous. BTW I trust you had a good time at the show as well?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_X
math and reading comprehension…how do they work?!
RatBastard
Joined: January 07, 2003 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 2955
Re: Ageing Thread
February 21, 2013 at 07:24 AM UTC
#
stevewizzle wrote:
RatBastard wrote:
stevewizzle wrote:
imbecile wrote:
stevewizzle wrote:
RatBastard wrote:
9) Has more to do with wealth than age.
gen x, everyone.
Wouldn't this be the Millennials or whatever the 1980 and on generation was termed? Gen X'ers are what, 34 at a minimum these days.
im referring to RB (gen x) thinking that twenty-somethings (millennials) are attracted to wealth, not age/appearance.
LOL Me gen-x! That has to be one of the funniest and most absurd things written on this forum ever.
not to like, call you stupid or anything, but yeah - you're gen x.
RatBastard wrote:
Its kind of sad but it is almost getting to that. 56 years old and lets see, three surgeries on each knee, four surgeries on my back, two on my right arm, three abdominal surgeries, one crainiotomy, two cranial gamma treatments, multiple eye surgeries (none cosmetic), several broken bones over the years, plus all the normal childhood things. The freakiest for me was when they had to do the steroid injections into my eyeball for bleeding around the optic nerve. Nothing like a hypodermic needle aimed at your eyeball to get you a little nervous. BTW I trust you had a good time at the show as well?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_X
I am actually more baby boomer than anything. Born 1955. Then again I am not all that into labels. <Most of them are rather silly and just go to further divide society.
chaz
Joined: December 09, 2002 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5111
Re: Ageing Thread
February 21, 2013 at 01:47 PM UTC
#
hutch wrote:
RatBastard wrote:
stevewizzle wrote:
RatBastard wrote:
stevewizzle wrote:
imbecile wrote:
stevewizzle wrote:
RatBastard wrote:
9) Has more to do with wealth than age.
gen x, everyone.
Wouldn't this be the Millennials or whatever the 1980 and on generation was termed? Gen X'ers are what, 34 at a minimum these days.
im referring to RB (gen x) thinking that twenty-somethings (millennials) are attracted to wealth, not age/appearance.
LOL Me gen-x! That has to be one of the funniest and most absurd things written on this forum ever.
not to like, call you stupid or anything, but yeah - you're gen x.
RatBastard wrote:
Its kind of sad but it is almost getting to that. 56 years old and lets see, three surgeries on each knee, four surgeries on my back, two on my right arm, three abdominal surgeries, one crainiotomy, two cranial gamma treatments, multiple eye surgeries (none cosmetic), several broken bones over the years, plus all the normal childhood things. The freakiest for me was when they had to do the steroid injections into my eyeball for bleeding around the optic nerve. Nothing like a hypodermic needle aimed at your eyeball to get you a little nervous. BTW I trust you had a good time at the show as well?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_X
I am actually more baby boomer than anything. Born 1955. Then again I am not all that into labels. <Most of them are rather silly and just go to further divide society.
oh is that why you call everyone a "libtard" about 5 times a day?
part of your not labeling people approach?
oh snap
kosmo
Joined: September 23, 1999 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 16329
Re: Ageing Thread
February 21, 2013 at 02:30 PM UTC
#
Being part of the baby boomers doesn't please, I have no need for the Rogaine, little blue pills or the Eagles, etc…
i'm fairly certain at one point i was at the very beginning of Gen-x, but it appears the "experts" can't agree on when it actually starts as seen in the wikipedia article. Wasn't Henry Rollins at one time considered Gen-X even though we was born late 50s?
beetsnotbeats
Joined: April 26, 2002 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5756
Re: Ageing Thread
February 21, 2013 at 02:41 PM UTC
#
Tom Tomorrow had a This Modern World comic years ago that featured him lamenting to Sparky that he didn't feel that he fit into either the boomers or Gen-X. He was born in 1961 (same year as Rollins) and felt that the media had him wedged in between the two demos. Sparky declared him a "wedgie".
I'd post the comic but Tomorrow's archives are down.
kosmo
Joined: September 23, 1999 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 16329
Re: Ageing Thread
February 21, 2013 at 02:45 PM UTC
#
ooh i like that… being called a wedgie :)
kosmo
Joined: September 23, 1999 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 16329
Re: Ageing Thread
February 21, 2013 at 02:51 PM UTC
#
I was surprised to find out that Ian Brown turned 50 this year, thought for sure the Stone Roses would have been in their 40s. So a prototypical Gen-X band are actually a bunch of wedgies :)
sweetcell
Joined: July 18, 2006 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 22608
Re: Ageing Thread
February 21, 2013 at 04:06 PM UTC
#
hutch wrote:
RatBastard wrote:
I am actually more baby boomer than anything. Born 1955. Then again I am not all that into labels. <Most of them are rather silly and just go to further divide society.
oh is that why you call everyone a "libtard" about 5 times a day?
part of your not labeling people approach?
well that pretty much seals up this week's POTW.