are you kidding me?

Originally posted by sweetcell:
walkies, i realize this may take a grandiose act of generosity on your part, but how about BOTH groups are discriminated against?

stepping on top of another oppressed group isn't going to do much to improve the lot of yours.
you are so right. i am done bitching about this stuff. it just makes me me angry, and angry people say stupid things before they think. both groups are treated like shit in this country and others . . . but sometimes it seems that people are only willing to accept black people's plight while kicking the queers to the curb. the end.

and jesus . . . now i know why people listen to cnn, fox news, msnbc, etc…. i just tried to listen to npr news for an hour or so while i cleaned today, and i am officially looking for the shotgun to end my life.
Originally posted by sweetcell:
walkies, i realize this may take a grandiose act of generosity on your part, but how about BOTH groups are discriminated against?

stepping on top of another oppressed group isn't going to do much to improve the lot of yours.
all this reminds me of is PCU (damn, that's another movie i forgot to add) where there's a line of people waiting to get into the concert and each group claims they are the most discriminated against and should be first in line.
jeremy piven has a small penis.
Originally posted by walkonby:
you are so right. i am done bitching about this stuff.
don't stop bitching on my behalf. you got an injustice to call out? go for. i was just taking you to task for practically denying another injustice.

Originally posted by walkonby:
it just makes me me angry, and angry people say stupid things before they think.
like, for example, blacks don't know what oppression is? :p

Originally posted by walkonby:
both groups are treated like shit in this country and others . . . but sometimes it seems that people are only willing to accept black people's plight while kicking the queers to the curb. the end.
fair enough. not entirely sure i subscribe to that point of view, but you put your feelings in much more eloquent terms.

keep up the good fight.
Originally posted by walkonby:
i'm sorry from the start if this offends you, but according to the 2010 census, the government will not recognize legal gay marriages, basically saying that gay people do not exist.
Yeah, the fact that they're doing this is really, really offensive. They're not just ignoring the perfectly legal same-sex marriages - they're taking it upon themselves to change the information from "married" to "unmarried partners". So it's not just insulting, it's skewing the data.
Originally posted by Bombay Chutney:
Originally posted by walkonby:
i'm sorry from the start if this offends you, but according to the 2010 census, the government will not recognize legal gay marriages, basically saying that gay people do not exist.
Yeah, the fact that they're doing this is really, really offensive. They're not just ignoring the perfectly legal same-sex marriages - they're taking it upon themselves to change the information from "married" to "unmarried partners". So it's not just insulting, it's skewing the data.
the government "changes" data to fit it's own needs? no, never.

god, how in the hell does anyone listen to diane rehm?
Originally posted by walkonby:
Originally posted by sweetcell:
[qb] , and i am officially looking for the shotgun to end my life.
It's in the closet in the spare bedroom!

;)
If gays get married how do they decide who's the wife, because should it end in divorce the bitch gets to keep all the stuff!
number 1 - bush blames dems. for high price of gas last week. uhmm . . . the price of gas has dropped almost seventy cents in less than two months. are they to blame for that as well? does anyone care that this could be a (close to the election) ploy seeing how the voters are saving money at the pump now?

number 2 - (more important of the two) cher could play catwoman in the next batman. :eek:
Next thing you know, the Republicans are going to give us a pullout date and tell us we've won the war.

Originally posted by walkonby:
number 1 - bush blames dems. for high price of gas last week. uhmm . . . the price of gas has dropped almost seventy cents in less than two months. are they to blame for that as well? does anyone care that this could be a (close to the election) ploy seeing how the voters are saving money at the pump now?

number 2 - (more important of the two) cher could play catwoman in the next batman. :eek:
i am surprized bush hasn't come out and blamed obama for the u.s. "losing" in afghanistan.

and if you want some great reading, check out the issue of national geographic that has iran on the cover. oh my god. the history of persia. the mis-information we live on based on our government's perception. i feel bad for the people of iran. and i thought we are controlled by religion.
I think we need to write Websters a letter and petition to have the word "Apathy" changed to fit it's new common usage:

"A person so distracted that he chooses not to focus or take action."

Even the most active advocate can cross the line into the world of "Everything and everybody is so fucked up, why vote or try to change it?" Thereby, giving into their worst distracting demons. An over-informed populous, as demonstrated by the last 10 years of internets, can in some ways be MORE apathetic by way of being MORE distracted.

We need to get over the word apathy or at least change the definition.

Now cynicism is a different ball game. If you're a cynic, you might as well be eating wet canned dog foood.
i guess wondering who is the coolest person and what to listen to while having sex is more important.