Super Bowl picks/favorite SB commercials (come Monday)

I keep thinking of that first Bills one, where Buffalo had the "unstoppable" offense and the Giants just ran the ball, and had 2/3 time of possession.  I also have the feeling Peyton may throw two or three INTs.  I just can't live in a world where the three teams that let Tim Tebow go can be ultimately successful.

Seahawks 34-Broncos 27.  MVP: Golden Tate.


Brian

i see a lot of people making stupid pot references, this year, because it is colorado and washington.  oh wait, they already are.  yeah dude . . . thats a super, bowl.

Rooting for Seattle.  I think Denver wins it, though.

The commercials were by and large pretty boring last year.  Maybe due for a rebound? 

I think Mr. Bates learns to control his anger and grows as a person and doesn't kill Lord Gillingham's valet when he gets confirmation that is who raped his wife.

I could probably name more breweries from each city than I could name players for each team. Both cities have an excellent beer scene.

That said, more Denver beer makes it's way here than Seattle. So i'll pick Denver.

Go Seattle.

I enjoyed watching them most of the year…

but if Seattle is going to win Russell Wilson is going to have to make some plays..he's looked pretty bad the past few weeks…

James wrote:
I could probably name more breweries from each city than I could name players for each team. Both cities have an excellent beer scene.

That said, more Denver beer makes it's way here than Seattle. So i'll pick Denver.

can anyone say alcoholic.

hutch wrote:

James wrote:
I could probably name more breweries from each city than I could name players for each team. Both cities have an excellent beer scene.

That said, more Denver beer makes it's way here than Seattle. So i'll pick Denver.

can anyone say alcoholic.

He only splits a 12 oz with his wife daily.

Brian_Wallace wrote:
I also have the feeling Peyton may throw two or three INTs.

This would be amazing.

Julian, wrote:

hutch wrote:

James wrote:
I could probably name more breweries from each city than I could name players for each team. Both cities have an excellent beer scene.

That said, more Denver beer makes it's way here than Seattle. So i'll pick Denver.

can anyone say alcoholic.

He only splits a 12 oz with his wife daily.

do they split it, in separate rooms?

Brian_Wallace wrote:

I keep thinking of that first Bills one, where Buffalo had the "unstoppable" offense and the Giants just ran the ball, and had 2/3 time of possession.  I also have the feeling Peyton may throw two or three INTs.  I just can't live in a world where the three teams that let Tim Tebow go can be ultimately successful.

Seahawks 34-Broncos 27.  MVP: Golden Tate.


Brian

Aren't you the one that used to rave about Jeff George?

Denver.  The NFL wants Peyton to win.

ggw wrote:
Aren't you the one that used to rave about Jeff George?

Brian_Wallace = Jason Whitlock?!!?

No board conspiracy theory has ever seemed so plausible.

as much as i hate to even think this . . . i really feel that the conformist country we live in, wants the (white) peyton to win over the (thug) sherman.

walkonby wrote:
as much as i hate to even think this . . . i really feel that the conformist country we live in, wants the (white) peyton to win over the (thug) sherman.

true..with probably a minority that wants Peyton foiled because we know we'll hear "Peyton is God" forever if he is not..

I guess I would put it this way: If Peyton plays a great great game I don't mind if he wins.. but he's got to earn it..step it up and play well in the big game under pressure… I don't want anything handed to him….


he'll never be joe montana though… NEVER.

can anyone say blockhead

hutch wrote:
Go Seattle.

I enjoyed watching them most of the year…

but if Seattle is going to win Russell Wilson is going to have to make some plays..he's looked pretty bad the past few weeks…

hutch wrote:
with probably a minority that wants Peyton foiled because we know we'll hear "Peyton is God" forever if he is not..

This is me. I've never liked the guy, although I'm admittedly biased because of all the crap back in 1997 with Charles Woodson winning "Peyton Manning's Heisman" and the conspiracy to deny Michigan the national championship as revenge from southern coaches.

Peyton is annoying because it's never his fault. Literally, it's never his fault. If his team loses, its because his defense was bad or he didn't have weapons around him (despite all advanced statistic saying he has had defenses equal to Tom Brady's his entire career and much more offensive talent by a large, large margin), but then if his team wins, its all because of Peyton. If his team has a good season, he wins the MVP – it was all Peyton. If they lose, even if its because of a Peyton INT-fest, it just slides right off him. We all know someone like that in life and its infuriating when people are so Teflon. I think that's why people hated Clinton. (Well, one reason.)

I mean, could you imagine if Tom Brady went out this week and called his kicker a liquored up idiot? We'd crucify him. He'd be public enemy #1. Peyton does it and its hilarious and Peyton is so authentic. People who see no accountability ever annoy me.

Julian, wrote:
I mean, could you imagine if Tom Brady went out this week and called his kicker a liquored up idiot?

Brady would never do that. He would get his wife to do it for him.

ggw wrote:

Julian, wrote:
I mean, could you imagine if Tom Brady went out this week and called his kicker a liquored up idiot?

Brady would never do that. He would get his wife to do it for him.

Actually, you've just made my point for me exactly, ggw. Tom Brady took more heat for "not keeping his woman in check" or whatever antiquated thing you want to say then Peyton got for calling the most accurate kicker in NFL history a liquored-up idiot on national television. That doesn't seem patently unfair?

One request…if you like a commercial and think it's worth watching….please post a link to that Ad

I could care less about the game and even the sport.
but do like some good SB ads