Your list sucks

Somebody let an intern do thier work…
11 bands better than The Beatles
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2014/02/07/11-bands-better-than-beatles/
Don't ever change Fox News…
Rush was not named after Limbaugh. You can take them off the list.

1. Led Zeppelin
2. Rolling Stones
3. Velvet Underground
4. U2
5. Radiohead
6. Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers
7. Rush
8. The Band
9. The Clash
10. Bruce Springsteen & E Street Band
11. The Replacements

Good ol' Fox News, topping their list with a band notorious for screwing and abusing 14 year old girls.

Never change, Fox.

Fox News Best Directors:
1. Woody Allen
1. Roman Polanski (tie)

Fox News Best Athletes:
1. Mike Tyson

Any list of better or best bands that includes U2 and Rush is obviously made by someone who has total hearing loss and terrible taste in music.  I am not sure if I can think of any bands worse than these two.

slappy wrote:
Somebody let an intern do thier work…
11 bands better than The Beatles
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2014/02/07/11-bands-better-than-beatles/
3. Velvet Underground
11. The Replacements

I find it hard to believe that anyone at fox news knows these two bands
must be an intern who gave them that

slappy wrote:
Somebody let an intern do thier work…
11 bands better than The Beatles
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2014/02/07/11-bands-better-than-beatles/
Don't ever change Fox News…
Rush was not named after Limbaugh. You can take them off the list.

1. Led Zeppelin
2. Rolling Stones
3. Velvet Underground
4. U2
5. Radiohead
6. Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers
7. Rush
8. The Band
9. The Clash
10. Bruce Springsteen & E Street Band
11. The Replacements

The Band sucks balls.  I mean dirty nasty sweaty balls.  This list is stupid.  I mean at least list bands with a tons of great songs like the Cure and Depeche Mode.  And the Velvet Underground?  Besides their first and their last they didn't have any good songs.  After Radiohead's first four albums they went to becoming a super shitty band.  Big Audio Dynamite is better than the Clash.  Of those bands the only one that you could even make an argument for would be zeppelin, u2, and rolling stones as those were the only of the list that had more than 4 good albums. 

atomic wrote:

slappy wrote:
Somebody let an intern do thier work…
11 bands better than The Beatles
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2014/02/07/11-bands-better-than-beatles/
Don't ever change Fox News…
Rush was not named after Limbaugh. You can take them off the list.

1. Led Zeppelin
2. Rolling Stones
3. Velvet Underground
4. U2
5. Radiohead
6. Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers
7. Rush
8. The Band
9. The Clash
10. Bruce Springsteen & E Street Band
11. The Replacements

The Band sucks balls.  I mean dirty nasty sweaty balls.  This list is stupid.  I mean at least list bands with a tons of great songs like the Cure and Depeche Mode.   And the Velvet Underground?  Besides their first and their last they didn't have any good songs.  After Radiohead's first four albums they went to becoming a super shitty band.   Big Audio Dynamite is better than the Clash.  Of those bands the only one that you could even make an argument for would be zeppelin, u2, and rolling stones as those were the only of the list that had more than 4 good albums. 

U2 collectively doesn't even play four good chords.

Relaxer wrote:
Fox News Best Directors:
1. Woody Allen
1. Roman Polanski (tie)

Fox News Best Athletes:
1. Mike Tyson

Mike Tyson wasn't a great athlete?  Really?

RatBastard wrote:

Relaxer wrote:
Fox News Best Directors:
1. Woody Allen
1. Roman Polanski (tie)

Fox News Best Athletes:
1. Mike Tyson

Mike Tyson wasn't a great athlete?  Really?

mike tyson was a good athlete, a great crazy person, and an even better video game.

Some of those bands were pretty good, Depeche Mode being pretty bad, but none better than the Beatles. That said, I think the best songs made by anyone on that list are American Girl, Born to Run, and Bastards of Young.

RatBastard wrote:
Any list of better or best bands that includes U2 and Rush is obviously made by someone who has total hearing loss and terrible taste in music.  I am not sure if I can think of any bands worse than these two.

you're on record as liking Sevendust and a few other turds.  just sayin'.

the list may suck, but i do believe we have compiled a numbers of the forum greatest hits now.

kosmo wrote:
the list may suck, but i do believe we have compiled a numbers of the forum greatest hits now.

Deductive reasoning at its finest.

sweetcell wrote:

RatBastard wrote:
Any list of better or best bands that includes U2 and Rush is obviously made by someone who has total hearing loss and terrible taste in music.  I am not sure if I can think of any bands worse than these two.

you're on record as liking Sevendust and a few other turds.  just sayin'.

Actually I do like many songs by Sevendust (their drummer kicks ass), they are way better than either U2 or Rush.  Then again a broken toilet being flushed is better than U2 or Rush.  Hell U2 doesn't even have a single member who has above average talent.  A perfect example of the money of the corporate machine pushing a bunch of no talent musicians (and I use the term loosely) to the top of the heap.

we all know why this was created, Obama must have said he like the Beatles.

peace and love, peace and love

atomic wrote:

slappy wrote:
Somebody let an intern do thier work…
11 bands better than The Beatles
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2014/02/07/11-bands-better-than-beatles/
Don't ever change Fox News…
Rush was not named after Limbaugh. You can take them off the list.

1. Led Zeppelin
2. Rolling Stones
3. Velvet Underground
4. U2
5. Radiohead
6. Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers
7. Rush
8. The Band
9. The Clash
10. Bruce Springsteen & E Street Band
11. The Replacements

The Band sucks balls.  I mean dirty nasty sweaty balls.  This list is stupid.  I mean at least list bands with a tons of great songs like the Cure and Depeche Mode.   And the Velvet Underground?  Besides their first and their last they didn't have any good songs.  After Radiohead's first four albums they went to becoming a super shitty band.   Big Audio Dynamite is better than the Clash.  Of those bands the only one that you could even make an argument for would be zeppelin, u2, and rolling stones as those were the only of the list that had more than 4 good albums. 

If it wasn't for The Band, none of the old timey bands you're a fan of would have a wardrobe.

kosmo wrote:
we all know why this was created, Obama must have said he like the Beatles.

Only if he thought he could get four votes out of it! :P

Funny because there are so many criteria that could make a "best" band. Best discography, best live performance…are all members irreplaceable? Did they cease making records before they sucked? It'd be interesting to see what the Beatles would have been like in concert with proper amplification. But yeah, that list is pretty lame.

Heard Rush Limbaugh coming from a car radio at lunch and came to the sudden realization that 'douche' is really a pejorative used only on white males.

I can't come up with a list of black, hispanic, or asian douches.
Is Kanye the only black douche?