What are people hearing on this? If he only has 31 posts left, how should he spend them? If his illustrious boarding career is done, how will we remember him and where does he rank in the pantheon of all-time boardies? Discuss.
META: Rumors abound about Kosmo Vinyl retiring at 10,000 posts
slacker
ggw wrote:Is it really befitting a boardie of his stature to hang around just to rack up end-of-career garbage stats a la Kobe Bryant? Wouldn't it be better for him to go out on top?
slacker
You're still relatively close to your boarding prime so different situation.
He should go out on top like Cosby did in the 90s.
grateful wrote:
He should go out on top like Cosby did in the 90s.
Sounds like Cosby was on top (or perhaps behind) in most decades…
GGW is killing it today. Grateful set anyone who wanted it up with that glorious boarding assist but respect is due for GGW to get there first.
Julian, wrote:
GGW is killing it today. Grateful set anyone who wanted it up with that glorious boarding assist but respect is due for GGW to get there first.
Whoa whoa whoa, lets not get carried away with all the capital letters!
grateful wrote:GGW is pronounced "G, G, W," correct? Grateful was the first word of a sentence. Both should be capitalized.Julian, wrote:
GGW is killing it today. Grateful set anyone who wanted it up with that glorious boarding assist but respect is due for GGW to get there first.
Whoa whoa whoa, lets not get carried away with all the capital letters!
The AP Style guide makes clear names of entities are to capitalized in both situations regardless of that entities chosen stylistic choices.
I'll retire but then you'll have to deal with evil santa
kosmo wrote:Do you feel like you will have accomplished everything you set out to accomplish if you do? Or would you always regret your shortcomings?
I'll retire but then you'll have to deal with evil santa
Julian, wrote:grateful wrote:GGW is pronounced "G, G, W," correct? Grateful was the first word of a sentence. Both should be capitalized.Julian, wrote:
GGW is killing it today. Grateful set anyone who wanted it up with that glorious boarding assist but respect is due for GGW to get there first.
Whoa whoa whoa, lets not get carried away with all the capital letters!
The AP Style guide makes clear names of entities are to capitalized in both situations regardless of that entities chosen stylistic choices.
So you've quoted the Style guide, and I can totally understand that approach, but it seems like relying too heavily on that source can be confusing for some people. Is there a way that we can agree to respect each user's choice?
grateful wrote:Yes, absolutely. I am always an advocate of acceptance despite my personal fastidiousness, and you asked so politely. Cheers.Julian, wrote:grateful wrote:GGW is pronounced "G, G, W," correct? Grateful was the first word of a sentence. Both should be capitalized.Julian, wrote:
GGW is killing it today. Grateful set anyone who wanted it up with that glorious boarding assist but respect is due for GGW to get there first.
Whoa whoa whoa, lets not get carried away with all the capital letters!
The AP Style guide makes clear names of entities are to capitalized in both situations regardless of that entities chosen stylistic choices.
So you've quoted the Style guide, and I can totally understand that approach, but it seems like relying too heavily on that source can be confusing for some people. Is there a way that we can agree to respect each user's choice?
you know Julian is licking his chops waiting for the job opening…..
Julian, wrote:grateful wrote:GGW is pronounced "G, G, W," correct?Julian, wrote:
GGW is killing it today. Grateful set anyone who wanted it up with that glorious boarding assist but respect is due for GGW to get there first.
Whoa whoa whoa, lets not get carried away with all the capital letters!
i've always pronounced is "guh guh wuh".
Another absurd use of meta
care to discuss, a non-absurd use of the term?
oh, no, he didn't.
god, I love the elegance, of the new page.
oh, no, he didn't.
god, I love the elegance, of the new page.
RatBastard wrote:
Another absurd use of meta
Well, what is a META for?

evilsanta wrote:
See what I mean? Do you really want my retirement?
walkonby wrote:
care to discuss, a non-absurd use of the term?
oh, no, he didn't.
god, I love the elegance, of the new page.
No need to. Some people know the use of the term and have demonstrated it here. :)