#10. Carry on.
Terps
What's the over/under on the number of burning couches in College Park after the Terps go out in the third round of the Tourney?
I'd take getting to the third round. Would only burn 1 couch and maybe an area rug, but would still be pretty happy.
Worse college sports fuckheads?
Vatechhokies or umdterps?
Vatechhokies or umdterps?
walkonby wrote:
Worse college sports fuckheads?
Vatechhokies or umdterps?
Throw in all these new Alabama fans from the last few years and just call it a three way tie.
jeffml wrote:
I'd take getting to the third round. Would only burn 1 couch and maybe an area rug, but would still be pretty happy.
Because of these silly play-in games, "third round" in the NCAA vernacular actually means the round of 32.
Oh if thats the case, then I'd definitely burn a few more couches. I'd be content with a Sweet 16 showing.
ggw wrote:I thought they gave up on that nomenclature and now the play-ins are the "Opening round" and the round of 64 is "first round", no? Or am I imagining this?jeffml wrote:
I'd take getting to the third round. Would only burn 1 couch and maybe an area rug, but would still be pretty happy.
Because of these silly play-in games, "third round" in the NCAA vernacular actually means the round of 32.
Julian, wrote:ggw wrote:I thought they gave up on that nomenclature and now the play-ins are the "Opening round" and the round of 64 is "first round", no? Or am I imagining this?jeffml wrote:
I'd take getting to the third round. Would only burn 1 couch and maybe an area rug, but would still be pretty happy.
Because of these silly play-in games, "third round" in the NCAA vernacular actually means the round of 32.
http://www.ncaa.com/interactive-bracket/basketball-men/d1
ggw wrote:OK, I'm imagining things again, apparently.Julian, wrote:ggw wrote:I thought they gave up on that nomenclature and now the play-ins are the "Opening round" and the round of 64 is "first round", no? Or am I imagining this?jeffml wrote:
I'd take getting to the third round. Would only burn 1 couch and maybe an area rug, but would still be pretty happy.
Because of these silly play-in games, "third round" in the NCAA vernacular actually means the round of 32.
http://www.ncaa.com/interactive-bracket/basketball-men/d1
EDIT: Apparently I'm not, I'm just a year early.
walkonby wrote:
Worse college sports fuckheads?
Vatechhokies or umdterps?
Not that it is a scientific test or anything but of the terps and hokies I know, the terps are by far and way the larger bags of douche.
RatBastard wrote:walkonby wrote:
Worse college sports fuckheads?
Vatechhokies or umdterps?
Not that it is a scientific test or anything but of the terps and hokies I know, the terps are by far and way the larger bags of douche.
I'd like to add UVA rapists.
Yada wrote:That's been pretty conclusively refuted. Rolling Stone had to apologize for the article.
I'd like to add UVA rapists.
Julian, wrote:Yada wrote:That's been pretty conclusively refuted. Rolling Stone had to apologize for the article.
I'd like to add UVA rapists.
I'd be willing to bet there are still plenty of rapists at UVA.
Yada wrote:As opposed to what school? What an inane take.
I'd be willing to bet there are still plenty of rapists at UVA.
Julian, wrote:Yada wrote:As opposed to what school? What an inane take.
I'd be willing to bet there are still plenty of rapists at UVA.
I didn't even read the Rolling Stone article, my assumptions are purely based on the type of fart brothers that attend UVA. In regards to comparing it to other university sexual assault stats, I'd be willing to bet any university that is fart-centric has higher stats.
Yada wrote:According to this article, University of Richmond and Va Tech have higher stats.Julian, wrote:Yada wrote:As opposed to what school? What an inane take.
I'd be willing to bet there are still plenty of rapists at UVA.
I didn't even read the Rolling Stone article, my assumptions are purely based on the type of fart brothers that attend UVA. In regards to comparing it to other university sexual assault stats, I'd be willing to bet any university that is fart-centric has higher stats.
And according to this article Julian's beloved Univ of Michigan is #2.
ggw wrote:They're still #1 to me.
And according to this article Julian's beloved Univ of Michigan is #2.
But seriously, that list doesn't really take into consideration that universities have different enrollments. Comparing a 50,000 person state university to a small liberal arts college is of course going to show a large disparity.
Julian, wrote:ggw wrote:They're still #1 to me.
And according to this article Julian's beloved Univ of Michigan is #2.
But seriously, that list doesn't really take into consideration that universities have different enrollments. Comparing a 50,000 person state university to a small liberal arts college is of course going to show a large disparity.
Gallaudet is like rape central:
http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/page/local/sex-offenses-on-us-college-campuses/1077/
Maybe he just didn't hear her when she said "no"….
I somehow knew Randolph Macon would show up very high if I sorted by incidents/1,000 students.