Originally posted by chokeychicken:as a big Get Up Kids fan, do you know why "impossible outcomes" never came out on an LP? it's my favorite song by them (excepting "dottie", maybe), but it's stuck on that "eudora" comp they put out … what were they thinking not giving that song a proper release?
i think the most i ever paid for a show was when i drove to kansas city, MO to see the last get up kids show ever last july.
What's the most you spent on a concert ticket?
$260 for a pair of 6th row, dead center tickets to oasis. :(
Originally posted by MAXX44:I think Larry Graham and Prince are buddies. Both are members of Jehovah's Witnesses.
$125 (face value) for Prince at the Warner a few years ago…watched the last half of the show with Larry Graham…
spent $300 per ticket, two tickets, to see radiohead june 2, 2006 at the tower theater in philly.
well worth it. especially at a venue that small when they were experimenting with new songs theyve been working on in the studio for over a year, but still have not yet officially released.
well worth it. especially at a venue that small when they were experimenting with new songs theyve been working on in the studio for over a year, but still have not yet officially released.
$300 is too much for radiohead for me still.
that being said i did go to 4 shows on the tour and had seats within 20 rows to all of them.
unless it was some sort of special show, i don't think i'd pay $100 for radiohead.
but i don't think radiohead are likely to charge that much. their prices are relatively low compared to what a lot of other bands are charging/what they really could charge.
i guess my real complaint is that starting with the 2001 touring they just didn't have as many dates per tour as they used to/could have.
that being said i did go to 4 shows on the tour and had seats within 20 rows to all of them.
unless it was some sort of special show, i don't think i'd pay $100 for radiohead.
but i don't think radiohead are likely to charge that much. their prices are relatively low compared to what a lot of other bands are charging/what they really could charge.
i guess my real complaint is that starting with the 2001 touring they just didn't have as many dates per tour as they used to/could have.
Originally posted by TheDirector217:I was talking about The Stones by the way . . . .
$400 give or take $50 three times in the past year. (Just saw 'em Friday night.) WOW! If they weren't in L.A. & Vancouver for the last 2 shows, I'd go RIGHT NOW. 60 year olds aren't supposed to rock like that. They're really not.