Rhett Miller
Joined: November 15, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 17762
Re: Show Conflict # 3?
March 19, 2008 at 07:12 PM UTC
#
I saw them open for somebody at the 9:30 Club and found them highly annoying.
Originally posted by Bombay Chutney:
Originally posted by wanderlust j. marshmallow:
DAMN. It's gonna be a long night. Who will be there? I'm considering this show again..LOL
Sons And Daughters 1045-12am
Holy F*ck 930-1015pm
A Place To Bury Strangers 830-915pm
I'm in. I'm not familiar with Sons and Daughters, but I'm really looking forward to the other two bands. Are S&D really worth losing sleep over?
Relaxer
Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5410
Re: Show Conflict # 3?
March 19, 2008 at 07:15 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by Bombay Chutney:
Originally posted by wanderlust j. marshmallow:
DAMN. It's gonna be a long night. Who will be there? I'm considering this show again..LOL
Sons And Daughters 1045-12am
Holy F*ck 930-1015pm
A Place To Bury Strangers 830-915pm
I'm in. I'm not familiar with Sons and Daughters, but I'm really looking forward to the other two bands. Are S&D really worth losing sleep over?
They're nothing particularly special, but they have solid, well-written, well-sung songs that often take a catchy riff as a springboard into a big chorus. It's not very innovative and their disc sometimes sounds a little too polished and slick, but if you drape some loud guitars on those songs, I'll bet it will be hot.
Relaxer
Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5410
Re: Show Conflict # 3?
March 19, 2008 at 07:18 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:
I saw them open for somebody at the 9:30 Club and found them highly annoying.
Y'know, now that you mention it, I think I saw them as an opener too. What show would that have been? Morning Jacket? Wilco? Trying to think where we'd overlap.
Anyway, I don't remember being very impressed with them at the time. Their current album wasn't out (and obviously I wasn't familiar with them), and it was at the 9:30, so circumstances are different this time.
Rhett Miller
Joined: November 15, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 17762
Re: Show Conflict # 3?
March 19, 2008 at 07:26 PM UTC
#
Took a bit of googling, but apparently it was the Decemberists on 10/2/05. Sound right?
Originally posted by Relaxer:
Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:
I saw them open for somebody at the 9:30 Club and found them highly annoying.
Y'know, now that you mention it, I think I saw them as an opener too. What show would that have been? Morning Jacket? Wilco? Trying to think where we'd overlap.
Anyway, I don't remember being very impressed with them at the time. Their current album wasn't out (and obviously I wasn't familiar with them), and it was at the 9:30, so circumstances are different this time.
Relaxer
Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5410
Re: Show Conflict # 3?
March 19, 2008 at 07:28 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:
Took a bit of googling, but apparently it was the Decemberists on 10/2/05. Sound right?
Jesus Christ NO
brokensocscene
Joined: December 12, 2005 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 9016
Re: Show Conflict # 3?
March 19, 2008 at 07:34 PM UTC
#
They opened for Bright Eyes…was it a Bright Eyes show? :D
Originally posted by Relaxer:
Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:
Took a bit of googling, but apparently it was the Decemberists on 10/2/05. Sound right?
Jesus Christ NO
Relaxer
Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5410
Re: Show Conflict # 3?
March 19, 2008 at 07:35 PM UTC
#
JESUS ECLIPSE, that's almost worse.
Who opened for Franz Ferdinand a few years ago? I think it was their first 9:30 show after the debut came out.
Rhett Miller
Joined: November 15, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 17762
Re: Show Conflict # 3?
March 19, 2008 at 07:39 PM UTC
#
The only time they are listed as playing the 9;30 Club here:
http://www.sonsanddaughtersloveyou.com/shows.php is 10/2/05.
Who did they open for on that date?
http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/29538/ Originally posted by Relaxer:
Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:
Took a bit of googling, but apparently it was the Decemberists on 10/2/05. Sound right?
Jesus Christ NO
sweetcell
Joined: July 18, 2006 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 22608
Re: Show Conflict # 3?
March 19, 2008 at 07:40 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by Bombay Chutney:
I'm in. I'm not familiar with Sons and Daughters, but I'm really looking forward to the other two bands. Are S&D really worth losing sleep over?
on the upside, aren't S&D the closers? if they don't work for you, you'll be able to bail earlier. so it becomes a game-time decision, as opposed to an opener that you have to sit through (or go to the bar upstairs and lose your spot on the floor).
brokensocscene
Joined: December 12, 2005 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 9016
Re: Show Conflict # 3?
March 19, 2008 at 07:41 PM UTC
#
Based on my research, S&D have only played once at the 9:30 Club (2005 with the Decemberists)…
You probably saw them at the Black Cat…?
skeeter
Joined: May 29, 2003 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4011
Re: Show Conflict # 3?
March 19, 2008 at 07:48 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by sweetcell:
on the upside, aren't S&D the closers? if they don't work for you, you'll be able to bail earlier.
Yep. That's the plan. But if the consensus was that they really, really suck, I wouldn't have to waste the extra 30 minutes of dead time before they come on to find out for myself.
Conversely, if the consensus is "OMG!?! - They're the greatest thing since Lou Reed!!!", I might stick around.
ggw
Joined: December 16, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 14237
Re: Show Conflict # 3?
March 19, 2008 at 08:27 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by Relaxer:
Who opened for Franz Ferdinand a few years ago? I think it was their first 9:30 show after the debut came out.
Sons and Daughters.
sweetcell
Joined: July 18, 2006 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 22608
Re: Show Conflict # 3?
March 20, 2008 at 02:28 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by Bombay Chutney:
Conversely, if the consensus is "OMG!?! - They're the greatest thing since Lou Reed!!!", I might stick around.
in which case: does anyone know how buff the members of Sons & Daughters are?
brokensocscene
Joined: December 12, 2005 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 9016
Re: Show Conflict # 3?
March 20, 2008 at 02:30 PM UTC
#
they are skinny…except for the plumpy lead singer.
Originally posted by sweetcell:
Originally posted by Bombay Chutney:
Conversely, if the consensus is "OMG!?! - They're the greatest thing since Lou Reed!!!", I might stick around.
in which case: does anyone know how buff the members of Sons & Daughters are?
Relaxer
Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5410
Re: Show Conflict # 3?
March 20, 2008 at 02:41 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by wanderlust j. marshmallow:
they are skinny…except for the plumpy lead singer.
She looked like a somewhat skinnier version of Beth Ditto, or a somewhat heavier version of Meg White.
brokensocscene
Joined: December 12, 2005 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 9016
Re: Show Conflict # 3?
May 24, 2008 at 01:53 PM UTC
#
LOVE IS ALL / VIDEOHIPPOS vs. THE BREEDERS?
skeeter
Joined: May 29, 2003 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4011
Re: Show Conflict # 3?
May 24, 2008 at 03:12 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by wanderlust j. marshmallow:
LOVE IS ALL / VIDEOHIPPOS vs. THE BREEDERS?
R.E.M.
azaghal1981
Joined: June 17, 2004 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 12035
Re: Show Conflict # 3?
June 04, 2008 at 10:53 PM UTC
#
Dan Deacon V. Modey Lemon?
Ulrich Schnauss V. Butthole Surfers?
SPARX
Joined: December 13, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 2070
Re: Show Conflict # 3?
June 05, 2008 at 02:29 AM UTC
#
Originally posted by azaghal1981:
Dan Deacon V. Modey Lemon?
Ulrich Schnauss V. Butthole Surfers?
Anytime you don't pick Gibby you've done yourself a disservice IMHO but to each their own.
azaghal1981
Joined: June 17, 2004 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 12035
Re: Show Conflict # 3?
June 05, 2008 at 02:42 AM UTC
#
Scratch that last one; they're on different nights.
It's Butthole Surfers V. Sharron Kraus/United Bible Studies which is a tougher call.
Butthole Surfers doors are at 7, though. If United Bible Studies don't go on until after 12, both would be doable.