howards gone

Originally posted by Venerable Bede:
Originally posted by flawd101:
a few shakespear books are already banned in skols and no howard in the morning sux.
what happened to the day when it was spelled skool? seeing spelled that way makes me think of <img src="http://www.mycigarettes.com/images/styles/skoalclass.jpg" alt=" - " />
Weird…it made me think of…
<img src="http://www.drschollsshoesnsandals.com/images/dr-scholls2.jpg" alt=" - " />
Originally posted by chimbly sweep:
Umm… I don't care if people "offend" me. I do care if they take up the *publicly owned* airwaves with meaninless drivel, misogyny, and lower the bar for "entertainment." Really.

Because the airwaves belong to us, all broadcasters must prove that they are using them for the "common good."
chimbley, Howard's number one in all his markets (I believe - the majority definitely, so I won't swear to all 30-something markets; number 1 in all the majors). I think that says pretty plainly that he passes any 'community standards' tests and is serving a community desire.

This common good issue you bring up is…problematic, to say the least. Outside of NPR and various traffic reports, who's going to be able to prove this standard, who will judge it, why is that a prerequisite for entertainment? Is a large public response not proof that something is entertaining? If it's not pornography, how are you going to censor "drivel"?

Why can't you just listen to NPR?

By the way, since they're my airwaves, can I have Rush and O'Reilly taken off? They speak lies, drivel and are not interested in the common good but their version of good, which is my version of bad, bad, bad.

-edit-
keith, didn't see your post when I posted this. Got caught up and had to answer myself…. ;)
Again, I'm not saying we should enforce the "common good" standard, just that it's always interesting food for thought, in light of the use of public facilities.

And for the third time, I believe censorship is fucking unamerican. I think market forces are the only thing that should knock these dickwads off the air.

Originally posted by Bags:
This common good issue you bring up is…problematic, to say the least. Outside of NPR and various traffic reports, who's going to be able to prove this standard, who will judge it, why is that a prerequisite for entertainment? Is a large public response not proof that something is entertaining? If it's not pornography, how are you going to censor "drivel"?

Why can't you just listen to NPR?

By the way, since they're my airwaves, can I have Rush and O'Reilly taken off? They speak lies, drivel and are not interested in the common good but their version of good, which is my version of bad, bad, bad.
Chimbley, we agree! Sorry, the post I responded to didn't sound like it…

But seriously, can I exert some kind of ownership rights over the airwaves and get Rush off? :D
Originally posted by chimbly sweep:
Again, I'm not saying we should enforce the "common good" standard, just that it's always interesting food for thought, in light of the use of public facilities.

And for the third time, I believe censorship is fucking unamerican. I think market forces are the only thing that should knock these dickwads off the air.

Originally posted by Bags:
This common good issue you bring up is…problematic, to say the least. Outside of NPR and various traffic reports, who's going to be able to prove this standard, who will judge it, why is that a prerequisite for entertainment? Is a large public response not proof that something is entertaining? If it's not pornography, how are you going to censor "drivel"?

Why can't you just listen to NPR?

By the way, since they're my airwaves, can I have Rush and O'Reilly taken off? They speak lies, drivel and are not interested in the common good but their version of good, which is my version of bad, bad, bad.
Well, if you say something like all broadcasters MUST prove that they work toward the "common good", then to me it seems that you are suggesting that a "common good" standard be enforced.
Originally posted by Bags:
Chimbley, we agree! Sorry, the post I responded to didn't sound like it…

But seriously, can I exert some kind of ownership rights over the airwaves and get Rush off? :D
NO NO NO! Never take Rush off. I love hearing him make a complete horses arse of himself. Him and minime Rush, Shaun Hannity.
Chimbley, my wife and i were wondering: are you a chick or are you a dude?

She insists that you must be a chick, I say a dude…I usually just assume everyone on here is a dude unless they deliberately indicate otherwise.
Originally posted by keithstg:
Well, if you say something like all broadcasters MUST prove that they work toward the "common good", then to me it seems that you are suggesting that a "common good" standard be enforced.
Actually, it is. Every time you apply or reapply for an FCC license to broadcast on the airwaves, you have to prove common good, and you need testimony to prove it.

In fact, Fox 5 here in DC is up for renewal of their FCC license right now.
Originally posted by Walkie hearts your balls:
Chimbley, my wife and i were wondering: are you a chick or are you a dude?

She insists that you must be a chick, I say a dude…I usually just assume everyone on here is a dude unless they deliberately indicate otherwise.
i am woman… hear me roar
(meow)

personally, i have no idea what gender others on this board are.
Thanks…guess she wins. Glad we didn't bet anything!

Originally posted by chimbly sweep:
Originally posted by Walkie hearts your balls:
Chimbley, my wife and i were wondering: are you a chick or are you a dude?

She insists that you must be a chick, I say a dude…I usually just assume everyone on here is a dude unless they deliberately indicate otherwise.
i am woman… hear me roar
(meow)

personally, i have no idea what gender others on this board are.
I like listening to Howard every once and a while, although the strippers/lesbian/porn star thing grows old real fast - I really enjoy the news, and general interviews.
The funny thing is that my phone number at work is only a couple of digits off of a MA senator's office. Within the last 2-3 weeks I have been receiving calls/voice mail from persons expressing their concerns about the protection of free speech and the occasional "HOWARD RULES!!!" call. I find no problem in saying that they do not sound like the brightest of constituents, but then I stop and say - "Ooops, I also listen to Howard." :o Oh well!!