Medusa
Joined: January 15, 2004 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 565
allmusic.com
July 13, 2004 at 08:31 PM UTC
#
Anyone else dislike the redo of the
http://www.allmusic.com web site? I use this site ALL the time and now I hate it.
Not only does it seem more confusing to me, but several of the pages don't load up properly.
I wish when people would change web sites they would not make them MORE difficult to navigate/use/read.
Why couldn't they have left it alone?!
Cheers
DJ Medusa.
Joymonster
Joined: November 01, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 701
Re: allmusic.com
July 13, 2004 at 08:34 PM UTC
#
They screwed it up. Barely useable.
Random Citizen
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: allmusic.com
July 13, 2004 at 08:36 PM UTC
#
This is a hot topic on a few message boards today. The site is difficult to navigate because many pages have to be refreshed constantly or you get an error message.
Even more annoying is that the site now only supports IE version 5.5 or higher (for Windows). So if you're on a Mac or use another browser, you're screwed.
chaz
Joined: December 09, 2002 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5111
Re: allmusic.com
July 13, 2004 at 08:37 PM UTC
#
I got:
We apologize for the temporary connection delay.
Please click the refresh button on your browser
Rhett Miller
Joined: November 15, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 17762
Re: allmusic.com
July 13, 2004 at 08:40 PM UTC
#
sucks ass
random search: Old 97's…first three albums are missing completely.
but the song samples are a welcome addition
Rhett Miller
Joined: November 15, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 17762
Re: allmusic.com
July 13, 2004 at 08:46 PM UTC
#
No listing of Yankee Hotel Foxtrot, or AM for Wilco either.
Originally posted by Random Citizen:
Originally posted by Rhett Miller:
random search: Old 97's…
Looks like someone forgot the definition of random. ;)
bags
Joined: October 30, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 8545
Re: allmusic.com
July 13, 2004 at 08:48 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by Random Citizen:
So if you're on a Mac or use another browser, you're screwed.
AAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHH
redsock
Joined: February 20, 2002 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1893
Re: allmusic.com
July 13, 2004 at 08:54 PM UTC
#
I too used allmusic all the time. I think we need to give them some time to work the bugs out though, before we write them off. The browser shit blows…who does that anymore? A big site with browser specific shit…. i smell a microsoft rat.
Random Citizen
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: allmusic.com
July 13, 2004 at 08:56 PM UTC
#
It's definitely a Microsoft rat…those sound clips they added (which are only available to registered users, btw)? Windows Media Player only.
redsock
Joined: February 20, 2002 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1893
Re: allmusic.com
July 13, 2004 at 09:01 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by Rhett Miller:
No listing of Yankee Hotel Foxtrot, or AM for Wilco either.
Originally posted by Random Citizen:
Originally posted by Rhett Miller:
random search: Old 97's…
Looks like someone forgot the definition of random. ;)
I found listings for both albums… and the 97s have the albums listed, but no content for them yet. I imagine some of it will just take some time
bellenseb
Joined: October 09, 2003 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1889
Re: allmusic.com
July 13, 2004 at 10:51 PM UTC
#
I dislike it too…the big problem for me is that now it requires several more clicks to see the same info as before.
You have to click once for the artist, again to see the discography, then click again to see the compilations, again to see the review…jesus! Before the revamp you could usually see it all in one page, and only go to a different page to read about a particular album, which made a lot of sense. This does not.
What other boards are discussing this, random citizen?
Barcelona
Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1342
Re: allmusic.com
July 14, 2004 at 01:58 AM UTC
#
Reading the posts I thought it was going to be really bad. As usual, it is difficult to get used to the new format, but I don't think it is that bad. I've always found all music.com to be one of the best and most useful sites on the internet and I think in a few days once I get used to the new format, it will still be one of the best sites out there.
Medusa
Joined: January 15, 2004 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 565
Re: allmusic.com
July 14, 2004 at 05:20 AM UTC
#
Has anyone tried registering and logging in?
This is completely maddening.
I registered, got the e-mail sent to my account, then went back to allmusic.com and have been retyping and retyping and RETYPING my e-mail address and password they sent, and I keep getting a page which says, "Invalid login, please try again."
All of this just because I am trying to look up a song by a certain band (you need to be registered now to look up songs).
How very irritating. :(
Cheers
DJ Medusa.
Re: allmusic.com
July 14, 2004 at 02:21 PM UTC
#
They're in cahoots with Barns & No-Bull, so they were forced to modernize.
The old site looked like shit.
chaz
Joined: December 09, 2002 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5111
Re: allmusic.com
July 14, 2004 at 02:27 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by Visual AIDS:
The old site looked like shit.
I'll agree. The old site was very useful and I had figured out how to make it work for me, but I thought it was pretty clunky.
Medusa
Joined: January 15, 2004 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 565
Re: allmusic.com
July 14, 2004 at 02:57 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by Random Citizen:
I didn't visit the site for its looks. I visited it because it was a quick and easy way to find information on a band, album or song.
This is *exactly* how I feel. Now it just takes so long to look up a song (hell, I still can't look up a song because the site still will not let me log in, even though I registered). :(
It's the time factor that definitely does it for me. I know they are trying to go for something better, but … the old site *functioned* better even though it didn't look as slick/nice.
Cheers
DJ Medusa.