markie
Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 13178
Re: "abuses" of Iraqi POW's
May 07, 2004 at 02:26 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by Bollocks:
Not fun, but I still feel very necessary and beneficial to the aircrew.
Nice post.
Preparing for a worst case scenario seems like a good idea. I got the impression that you were practicing on a real P.O.W. That would have been bad.
Thanks for the insight though.
ggw
Joined: December 16, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 14237
Re: "abuses" of Iraqi POW's
May 07, 2004 at 02:28 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by Bollocks:
I can't go into the full details, but we did treat them very badly without physically injuring them.
I could hear one sobbing like a baby while up against the wall waiting for his turn.
Wait – was this in the military, or at the car dealership??
Rhett Miller
Joined: November 15, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 17762
Re: "abuses" of Iraqi POW's
May 07, 2004 at 02:30 PM UTC
#
Worse, they have us Bob and Doug Mackennzie, and a crapload of bad music, which has been covered in previous threads.
But we're kicking their asses now on the exchange rates, and I'm going to Canada twice this year. Woohoo.
Originally posted by Macktastic Bag O' Flash:
Originally posted by Dupek Chopra:
Originally posted by Macktastic Bag O' Flash:
maybe we will fight [..] Canada one day, but it's not happening now…
We already beat them once! Read a history book.
So there's the example – did they torture and abuse U.S. pows? You tell us, board historian…how did our 'standards' of warfare compare?
Rhett Miller
Joined: November 15, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 17762
Re: "abuses" of Iraqi POW's
May 07, 2004 at 02:39 PM UTC
#
That sounds intriguing, but no, I'll only be visiting the cities of Toronto and Montreal. (Montreal next weekend).
Originally posted by Dupek Chopra:
Originally posted by Sacktastic Bag O' Nuts:
Worse, they have us Bob and Doug Mackennzie, and a crapload of bad music, which has been covered in previous threads.
But we're kicking their asses now on the exchange rates, and I'm going to Canada twice this year. Woohoo.
Are you, by chance, going to see the wildest part of the North American Continent, the beautiful Thelon preserve?
Rhett Miller
Joined: November 15, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 17762
Re: "abuses" of Iraqi POW's
May 07, 2004 at 02:51 PM UTC
#
Sucks for you.
Hopefully the exchange rates will improve for Americans when we plan to go somewhere in Europe in 2005. If not, will just have to scale back on the visit.
Originally posted by Bollocks:
Originally posted by Sacktastic Bag O' Nuts:
[QB]
But we're kicking their asses now on the exchange rates, and I'm going to Canada twice this year. Woohoo.
But Britain is kicking doodlevilles arse on the exchange rate…unfortunately I'm going over there…yet again, it sucks to be me! :mad:
bags
Joined: October 30, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 8545
Re: "abuses" of Iraqi POW's
May 07, 2004 at 02:57 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by Ball Girl:
Originally posted by Macktastic Bag O' Flash:
Alas, usually the countries we're FIGHTING are not of the more civilized ilk.
hmmm…that sounds pretty arrogant…the fundamentalist muslims might think we westerners are pretty "uncivilized" what with all our free sexuality, women going to school, drinking and the like…
You're right – I didn't mean the entire countries, I meant the war and fighting style of our opposition, and that may not necessarily be the official militiary. I was referring to the torture and abuse directed at Americans that we should be better than….you know, all that stuff folks here keep mentioning.
Ditto to Mank's reference to SE DC – the discussion was on warfare and how wars are fought, what's appropriate or not and what standard we might hold our military to. The brush I was painting with was not intended to cover any country entirely – the US or others. Hell, we treat each other like SHIT.
godsshoeshine
Joined: September 18, 2003 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4826
Re: "abuses" of Iraqi POW's
May 07, 2004 at 03:30 PM UTC
#
say we are caring too much about the prison "abuses". should we just ignore them? not read the papers?