the grammys — 930 Forums

vansmack

Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC

Posts: 19725

Re: the grammys February 24, 2003 at 03:44 AM UTC #

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by poorlulu: Ow now you are talking baby….<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Free Yayo!

markie

Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC

Posts: 13178

Re: the grammys February 24, 2003 at 03:45 AM UTC #

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by poorlulu: Ow now you are talking baby….<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>I thought I told you to stop hitting on internet weidos…..

vansmack

Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC

Posts: 19725

Re: the grammys February 24, 2003 at 03:56 AM UTC #

How bitchen is Kid Rock's seat belt guitar strap?I want one.

ggw

Joined: December 16, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC

Posts: 14237

Re: the grammys February 24, 2003 at 03:56 AM UTC #

The Flaming Lips won:Best Rock Instrumental Performance (For solo, duo, group or collaborative performances, without vocals. Includes Rock, Hard Rock and Metal. Singles or Tracks only.)Approaching Pavonis Mons By Balloon (Utopia Planitia) The Flaming Lips Track from: Yoshimi Battles The Pink Robots [Warner Bros. Records]

vansmack

Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC

Posts: 19725

Re: the grammys February 24, 2003 at 04:18 AM UTC #

I enjoyed the Strummer tribute. I thought Bruce, Elvis, Dave, Tony and Van Zandt did a quality job. Was the drummer the E Street drummer?

markie

Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC

Posts: 13178

Re: the grammys February 24, 2003 at 04:20 AM UTC #

I enjoyed it too. I dunno about the drummer it was the no doubt guitarist though.I wish they had left Bruce to sing it all, he looks kinda strummer like especially the contorted face whilst singing….

markie

Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC

Posts: 13178

Re: the grammys February 24, 2003 at 04:26 AM UTC #

so its official Norah Jones is shite, winning that many grammys its a sure sign that everyone will go Norah Who? By next year

vansmack

Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC

Posts: 19725

Re: the grammys February 24, 2003 at 04:27 AM UTC #

Norah Jones is overrated.Alright, I'm off for a pint at the P's. C-ya!

markie

Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC

Posts: 13178

Re: the grammys February 24, 2003 at 04:32 AM UTC #

I'm off for some sleapy bye bye'sbye bye

jadetree

Joined: April 22, 2002 at 05:01 AM UTC

Posts: 3161

Re: the grammys February 24, 2003 at 04:35 AM UTC #

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by vansmack: Was the drummer the E Street drummer? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Isn't the E straet drummer Max Weinberg from Conan?

andyrichter

Joined: September 17, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC

Posts: 996

Re: the grammys February 24, 2003 at 04:50 AM UTC #

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by jadetree:

Originally posted by vansmack: Was the drummer the E Street drummer? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Isn't the E straet drummer Max Weinberg from Conan?

yep jadetree. you are correct. i should know, i was on the freaking show for 7 years! i enjoyed the clash tribute as well. bruce and co. did a great job. i especially liked elvis.

Henry Dark

Joined: Unknown

Posts: 0

Re: the grammys February 24, 2003 at 03:05 PM UTC #

Norah Jones, Eight Grammies…sometimes good does triumph over evil…Jones also won best new artist, whupping a field of singers aimed directly at the kids' market: Ashanti, Michelle Branch, John Mayer and punk-pop star Avril Lavigne. This could reflect Jones's artistry, though it could also be a function of something else: The typical Grammy voter is double the age of the typical Ashanti fan, and was far more likely to actually enjoy Jones's work.

Fico

Joined: Unknown

Posts: 0

Re: the grammys February 24, 2003 at 03:14 PM UTC #

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by markie: I enjoyed it too. I dunno about the drummer it was the no doubt guitarist though.I wish they had left Bruce to sing it all, he looks kinda strummer like especially the contorted face whilst singing….<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Tony Kanal from No Doubt was handling bass duties, not guitar.. as for the drummer I know it wasn't Max Weinberg (E Street Band)…yet it was an old geezer who I don't reckon to be a session player.. so maybe its the old Clash drummer???grammy moment from the Washington Post: Some onstage antiwar talk did come from Fred Durst, lead singer of Limp Bizkit. "I hope we're all in agreeance that this war should go away as soon as possible," he said. A few million war opponents must have cringed and wondered: Is this the best we've got? There are no peace-lovers out there who can pronounce "agreement"? ps: GO NORAH!!… Gwen is an ugly tart who looks like transvestite..

sonickteam2

Joined: Unknown

Posts: 0

Re: the grammys February 24, 2003 at 03:41 PM UTC #

look how he spelled Bizkit!!!

markie

Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC

Posts: 13178

Re: the grammys February 24, 2003 at 03:44 PM UTC #

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by sonickteam2: look how he spelled Bizkit!!!<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>and yet he has no problem spelling limp. Is it just me or do others find that ironic?

poorlulu

Joined: Unknown

Posts: 0

Re: the grammys February 24, 2003 at 03:46 PM UTC #

ain't censorship grand………….does it make you proud to be umeeeeeerikun…………? <A HREF="http://www.drudgereport.com/crow.htm" TARGET=_blank>http://www.drudgereport.com/crow.htm</A>;

ggw

Joined: December 16, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC

Posts: 14237

Re: the grammys February 24, 2003 at 03:51 PM UTC #

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by Henry Dark: Norah Jones, Eight Grammies…sometimes good does triumph over evil…Jones also won best new artist, whupping a field of singers aimed directly at the kids' market: Ashanti, Michelle Branch, John Mayer and punk-pop star Avril Lavigne. This could reflect Jones's artistry, though it could also be a function of something else: The typical Grammy voter is double the age of the typical Ashanti fan, and was far more likely to actually enjoy Jones's work.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Too bad that Best New Artist is traditionally the Kiss of Death.

sonickteam2

Joined: Unknown

Posts: 0

Re: the grammys February 24, 2003 at 03:52 PM UTC #

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by poorlulu: ain't censorship grand………….does it make you proud to be umeeeeeerikun…………? <A HREF="http://www.drudgereport.com/crow.htm" TARGET=_blank>http://www.drudgereport.com/crow.htm</A>; <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> you americans are real characters, i tell ya.

ggw

Joined: December 16, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC

Posts: 14237

Re: the grammys February 24, 2003 at 04:01 PM UTC #

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by poorlulu: ain't censorship grand………….does it make you proud to be umeeeeeerikun…………? <A HREF="http://www.drudgereport.com/crow.htm" TARGET=_blank>http://www.drudgereport.com/crow.htm</A>; <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Too bad that report turned out to be false…………… ………………………………….. ……………………………….. ………………………………..

Space Freely

Joined: December 13, 2014 at 07:28 PM UTC

Posts: 11019

Re: the grammys February 11, 2019 at 02:02 PM UTC #

Was anybody else forced to watch the Grammys this year?

We watched the first 1:45 of the show before we put our daughter to bed, the made love*, then got up and watched the finale of Bodyguard**.

*this info is for Hutch and Sidehutch
**this info is for Julian, Mr. Prestige TV

Anyway, a greatest hits of my wife's non-pc comments:

1. (In reference to Anthony Kiedis) "Why does he have to have that retard haircut? He looks like Jim Carrey in Dumb and Dumber."

2. "Who did Billy Ray Cyrus have to blow for his daughter to get multiple Grammy performances?" (on the same night, she hasn't released an album since 2017)

3. (In reference to a "country" music duo called Dan and Shay (I kept thinking they were called Jan and Dean)) "This is the music they play to torture Arab terrorists."

And my own observation: They should just called it the Female Grammys. Very few men performing. I didn't catch it when they introduced John Mayer and I didn't recognize him…I swear I thought he was a lesbian until he spoke,

The end.