HoyaSaxa03
Joined: March 22, 2004 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 7053
Superchunk
June 05, 2007 at 02:14 AM UTC
#
does anyone know what's going on with them? did they even announce that they were on hiatus or broken up? is mac just doing portastatic for the foreseeable future?
the acoustic version of "detroit has a skyline too" on "cup of sand" is pretty fantastic
brokensocscene
Joined: December 12, 2005 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 9016
Re: Superchunk
June 05, 2007 at 02:35 AM UTC
#
They were just on hiatus. They have dates in Chicago and a free show in NYC soon.
xine
Joined: April 15, 2004 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 806
Re: Superchunk
June 05, 2007 at 03:28 AM UTC
#
http://www.superchunk.com/news.html May 18, 2007
MISFITS AND MISTAKES COMING JUNE 5TH
A Superchunk 7" single comes out June 5th! and it's a freaking picture disc no less. "Misfits and Mistakes" is the A-side, and the flip is the same song, only with everyone's favorite meat wad, Meatwad, singing. [plus the info that Wanderlust mentioned about Chicago/NYC shows]
HoyaSaxa03
Joined: March 22, 2004 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 7053
Re: Superchunk
June 05, 2007 at 03:38 AM UTC
#
thanks!
maybe i should have, you know, CHECKED THEIR WEBSITE before posting here
i'm what many call an "internet power user"
brokensocscene
Joined: December 12, 2005 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 9016
Re: Superchunk
June 05, 2007 at 01:55 PM UTC
#
i'm tempted to go to the free NYC show…
Rhett Miller
Joined: November 15, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 17762
Re: Superchunk
June 05, 2007 at 02:09 PM UTC
#
When I lived in Chapel Hill for a year, the drummer for Superchunk was in line behind me a couple of time at Whole Foods (then Fresh Fields).
I offered to buy his groceries for him, but he refused my charity.
tigersscareme
Joined: April 10, 2006 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 414
Re: Superchunk
June 05, 2007 at 02:58 PM UTC
#
they're doing more stuff now than they have in while.
i think it's all the babies.
i think the last two portastatic records are pretty stellar too.
godsshoeshine
Joined: September 18, 2003 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4826
Re: Superchunk
June 05, 2007 at 03:08 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:
When I lived in Chapel Hill for a year, the drummer for Superchunk was in line behind me a couple of time at Whole Foods (then Fresh Fields).
I offered to buy his groceries for him, but he refused my charity.
that's actually pretty awesome
BookerT
Joined: October 30, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1410
Re: Superchunk
June 05, 2007 at 03:26 PM UTC
#
if they were playing with the mountain goats and the ponys for free in brooklyn (that's the lineup for chicago), i'd definitely go to that. i'm still kinda tempted. superchunk's right there with ted leo in the "seriously, how can you NOT love them?" category, i think.
HoyaSaxa03
Joined: March 22, 2004 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 7053
Re: Superchunk
June 05, 2007 at 03:28 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by BookerT:
if they were playing with the mountain goats and the ponys for free in brooklyn (that's the lineup for chicago), i'd definitely go to that. i'm still kinda tempted. superchunk's right there with ted leo in the "seriously, how can you NOT love them?" category, i think.
wow, i seem to remember a lot of serious hatred for them on this board in the past … no?
Rhett Miller
Joined: November 15, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 17762
Re: Superchunk
June 05, 2007 at 03:56 PM UTC
#
I find all four of those bands annoying to varying degrees!
Originally posted by BookerT:
if they were playing with the mountain goats and the ponys for free in brooklyn (that's the lineup for chicago), i'd definitely go to that. i'm still kinda tempted. superchunk's right there with ted leo in the "seriously, how can you NOT love them?" category, i think.
bags
Joined: October 30, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 8545
Re: Superchunk
June 06, 2007 at 04:11 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by BookerT:
"seriously, how can you NOT love them?" category, i think.
Don't love them. Tried because my friend loves them so much, but I don't get them. Don't hate 'em, but have no love (and wouldn't see them for free, probably…)