ixkpd-bk
Joined: December 12, 2005 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1114
Re: Coachella 2009
January 15, 2009 at 10:01 AM UTC
#
ixkpd-bk wrote:
I love that Britney is rumored.
Fuck it, it's worth coming out a day early for, to see her 1st LA show on the tour. I have NO shame in wanting to see this. NONE.
sweetcell
Joined: July 18, 2006 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 22608
Re: Coachella 2009
January 15, 2009 at 03:05 PM UTC
#
dude - you have no shame whatsoever, whether britney is involved or not :D
ixkpd-bk
Joined: December 12, 2005 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1114
Re: Coachella 2009
January 15, 2009 at 03:20 PM UTC
#
sweetcell wrote:
dude - you have no shame whatsoever, whether britney is involved or not :D
This is very true!
callat703
Joined: May 25, 2005 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1710
Re: Coachella 2009
January 15, 2009 at 03:26 PM UTC
#
ixkpd-bk wrote:
sweetcell wrote:
dude - you have no shame whatsoever, whether britney is involved or not :D
This is very true!
Random question - are you intending for your signature "Le-a" to be pronounced Le-dash-ah?
Believe it or not, I've heard of more than one person with that name spelling, where they are pronouncing they are using the hyphen as an actual substitute for "dash."
manimtired
Joined: June 05, 2003 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1432
Re: Coachella 2009
January 15, 2009 at 03:39 PM UTC
#
ixkpd-bk wrote:
sweetcell wrote:
dude - you have no shame whatsoever, whether britney is involved or not :D
This is very true!
both of you should really start posting on the Hot 97 board..seriously. wtf? lol!
azaghal1981
Joined: June 17, 2004 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 12035
Re: Coachella 2009
January 15, 2009 at 03:46 PM UTC
#
ixkpd-bk wrote:
ixkpd-bk wrote:
I love that Britney is rumored.
Fuck it, it's worth coming out a day early for, to see her 1st LA show on the tour. I have NO shame in wanting to see this. NONE.
As long as you have the right intentions (rooting for a trainwreck of epic proportions), I see nothing wrong with this.
ixkpd-bk
Joined: December 12, 2005 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1114
Re: Coachella 2009
January 15, 2009 at 05:03 PM UTC
#
callat703 wrote:
ixkpd-bk wrote:
sweetcell wrote:
dude - you have no shame whatsoever, whether britney is involved or not :D
This is very true!
Random question - are you intending for your signature "Le-a" to be pronounced Le-dash-ah?
Believe it or not, I've heard of more than one person with that name spelling, where they are pronouncing they are using the hyphen as an actual substitute for "dash."
The dash don't be silent.
azaghal1981 wrote:
ixkpd-bk wrote:
ixkpd-bk wrote:
I love that Britney is rumored.
Fuck it, it's worth coming out a day early for, to see her 1st LA show on the tour. I have NO shame in wanting to see this. NONE.
As long as you have the right intentions (rooting for a trainwreck of epic proportions), I see nothing wrong with this.
Well…yeah, that's the main reason why I'd wanna go. But, believe I genuinely do loves me some Brit. Trashy, throwaway dance pop music is supposed to be taken at face value. I mean, if we can't acknowledge that she is just as culturally and musically relevant as whatever Pitchfork indie band like, for instance, Fleet Foxes, then we're not being fair.
sweetcell
Joined: July 18, 2006 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 22608
Re: Coachella 2009
January 15, 2009 at 05:46 PM UTC
#
manimtired wrote:
ixkpd-bk wrote:
sweetcell wrote:
dude - you have no shame whatsoever, whether britney is involved or not :D
This is very true!
both of you should really start posting on the Hot 97 board..seriously. wtf? lol!
what exactly have i done to earn this scorn? i made a comment on ixkpd-bk's general disposition, as someone who knows him in real life i feel comfortable doing that. nothing to do with britney… oh, wait, my bad. it's manamitired. apologies for assuming he'd make sense.
ixkpd-bk wrote:
I mean, if we can't acknowledge that she is just as culturally and musically relevant as whatever Pitchfork indie band like, for instance, Fleet Foxes, then we're not being fair.
wrong board.
manimtired
Joined: June 05, 2003 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1432
Re: Coachella 2009
January 15, 2009 at 05:56 PM UTC
#
sweetcell wrote:
manimtired wrote:
ixkpd-bk wrote:
sweetcell wrote:
dude - you have no shame whatsoever, whether britney is involved or not :D
This is very true!
both of you should really start posting on the Hot 97 board..seriously. wtf? lol!
what exactly have i done to earn this scorn? i made a comment on ixkpd-bk's general disposition, as someone who knows him in real life i feel comfortable doing that. nothing to do with britney… oh, wait, my bad. it's manamitired. apologies for assuming he'd make sense.
ixkpd-bk wrote:
I mean, if we can't acknowledge that she is just as culturally and musically relevant as whatever Pitchfork indie band like, for instance, Fleet Foxes, then we're not being fair.
wrong board.
ur right..is there a station that spins such great bands as pearl jam and the pet shop boys?
brokensocscene
Joined: December 12, 2005 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 9016
Re: Coachella 2009
January 16, 2009 at 07:04 PM UTC
#
I'm predicting that Leonard Cohen will be at Coachella this year.
manimtired
Joined: June 05, 2003 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1432
Re: Coachella 2009
January 16, 2009 at 07:04 PM UTC
#
thats nice.
bunnyman
Joined: November 19, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5542
Re: Coachella 2009
January 26, 2009 at 09:32 PM UTC
#
Don't they usually announce the lineup by now? Weird.
brokensocscene
Joined: December 12, 2005 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 9016
Re: Coachella 2009
January 26, 2009 at 09:43 PM UTC
#
tomorrow around 730 am PST.
i'm sure it will leak tonite though :)
bearman wrote:
Don't they usually announce the lineup by now? Weird.
ixkpd-bk
Joined: December 12, 2005 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1114
Re: Coachella 2009
January 27, 2009 at 12:32 PM UTC
#
Where's the info!?!? GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!
I'm wondering if we'll get QOTSA? Morrissey? Adele? Metronomy? Fever Ray? Basement Jaxx? Massive Attack? Prodigy? Jay-Z?
wml7
Joined: February 19, 2004 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3064
Re: Coachella 2009
January 27, 2009 at 03:07 PM UTC
#
I don't think we are getting the lineup today. It was on the KROQ website yesterday that it will be announced this morn. Now this morn on the website it's gone. So who knows with the lineup. Also usually if the announcement was today we would have heard something about it last night. So who knows.
brokensocscene
Joined: December 12, 2005 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 9016
Re: Coachella 2009
January 27, 2009 at 03:12 PM UTC
#
Who is ?confirmed? (so far): The Airborne Toxic Event, The Bug. Brian Jonestown Massacre, Buraka Som Sistema, Christopher Lawrence, Crystal Castles, Drop The Lime, Fleet Foxes, Flying Lotus, Franz Ferdinand, Girl Talk, The Hold Steady, The Killers, The Knux, Mike Patton, N.A.S.A., No Age, Noah and the Whale, Late of the Pier, Los Campesinos!, Lupe Fiasco, Paul McCartney, Paul Weller, Peanut Butter Wolf, The Presets, Sebastian Tellier, Themselves, Tinariwen, X
ixkpd-bk
Joined: December 12, 2005 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1114
Re: Coachella 2009
January 29, 2009 at 03:06 PM UTC
#
Joe. WHERE IS IT? WHERE IS THE LINEUP?
Got Haggis?
Joined: October 22, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 2016
Re: Coachella 2009
January 29, 2009 at 03:55 PM UTC
#
In the interest of reducing world Internet traffic, we can tell you that the lineup for the 2009 edition of the Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival will NOT be announced today. That?s according to Paul Tollett, the chief architect of the signature California rock festival, who feels the pain of fans who JUST. NEED. TO. KNOW.
Tollett says, ?I know everybody is going crazy, but we?re not stalling, we?re still working on the show. Everything we do is in service of the show, not in service of the announcement of the show. Believe me, we?re excited to tell everybody and we want to tell everybody, but the show is still being put together.?
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/music_blog/2009/01/coachella-fans.html
brokensocscene
Joined: December 12, 2005 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 9016
Re: Coachella 2009
January 29, 2009 at 04:03 PM UTC
#
well, The Killers and Paul McCartney will be there as headliners…not excited about either.