930 Forums

Garfunkel keeping hair on end...

Celeste
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end... February 13, 2004 at 05:58 PM UTC #
why do you stoners want it legalized? All that will happen then is they'll tax the shit out of it so you'll all end up paying a fortune for for the stuff.
ha ha…I agree with this one

I agree with telling your kids that if you start with pot, you will soon end with something else, which will be more dangerous. I think it's a good preventive measure.
I disagree with this…why lie to them? It's really not true. Just tell them that it makes them dumber than they could be if they didn't smoke it, while believing that they are actually smarter and more interesting than they really are, and that inhaling any kind of smoke is bad for their lungs.
walkman
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end... February 13, 2004 at 06:47 PM UTC #
Originally posted by Celeste:
Originally posted by mankie:
Because it's a very bad road to go down…pot first then mushrooms, then crack, then meth, then heroine….where does it end?
you forgot LSD…it comes usually either before or after mushrooms…and, many people who do pot, shrooms and LSD would never do crack or coke…it's a totally different buzz
agreed. I've never tried shrooms or acid, but I think it appeals to a very different (and in my mind healthier and safer) crowd than crack/coke/meth/heroin etc. plus you can't get addicted (at least physically) to any of the hallucinogens.
thirsty moore
Joined: January 11, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 6131
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end... February 13, 2004 at 07:04 PM UTC #
A healthier and safer crowd? Do pot smokers exercise more than coke addicts? Who's to say someone that takes acid is safer than someone that does meth?

I can see that acid/shrooms/pot is a healthier alternative to the other drugs listed. But, unless I read your post wrong, I think you're logic is a bit off.

Originally posted by walkie hearts you all:
agreed. I've never tried shrooms or acid, but I think it appeals to a very different (and in my mind healthier and safer) crowd than crack/coke/meth/heroin etc.
mankie
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end... February 13, 2004 at 07:06 PM UTC #
Originally posted by thirsty moore:
A healthier and safer crowd? Do pot smokers exercise more than coke addicts? Who's to say someone that takes acid is safer than someone that does meth?

I can see that acid/shrooms/pot is a healthier alternative to the other drugs listed. But, unless I read your post wrong, I think you're logic is a bit off.

Originally posted by walkie hearts you all:
agreed. I've never tried shrooms or acid, but I think it appeals to a very different (and in my mind healthier and safer) crowd than crack/coke/meth/heroin etc.
Of course his logic is a bit off….the chemicals have fucked his brain up.

<img src="http://www.c-science.com/txt/images/1999/990406tefax.jpg" alt=" - " />
markie
Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 13178
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end... February 13, 2004 at 07:08 PM UTC #
It made sense to me……

separating those drugs that are physically addictive, from those that are not…….
ggw
Joined: December 16, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 14237
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end... February 13, 2004 at 07:10 PM UTC #
Originally posted by thirsty moore:
A healthier and safer crowd? Do pot smokers exercise more than coke addicts? Who's to say someone that takes acid is safer than someone that does meth?

I can see that acid/shrooms/pot is a healthier alternative to the other drugs listed. But, unless I read your post wrong, I think you're logic is a bit off.
Somebody is a little defensive of his crank habit……
thirsty moore
Joined: January 11, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 6131
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end... February 13, 2004 at 07:15 PM UTC #
You're damn straight. I trust my dealer; and he trusts me.

Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
Somebody is a little defensive of his crank habit……
walkman
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end... February 13, 2004 at 07:16 PM UTC #
Originally posted by thirsty moore:

I can see that acid/shrooms/pot is a healthier alternative to the other drugs listed.
exactly…so what were we arguing about?

point is, hallucinogens â?? due to the fact that they are not physically addictive â?? can be experimented with. I'm yet to see a junkie who can claim he or she simply "experiments" with smack.
thirsty moore
Joined: January 11, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 6131
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end... February 13, 2004 at 07:23 PM UTC #
Blah, I misread your post. Don't mind me.

Originally posted by walkie hearts you all:
exactly…so what were we arguing about?

point is, hallucinogens â?? due to the fact that they are not physically addictive â?? can be experimented with. I'm yet to see a junkie who can claim he or she simply "experiments" with smack.
mankie
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end... February 13, 2004 at 07:26 PM UTC #
Originally posted by mark e smith:
It made sense to me……

separating those drugs that are physically addictive, from those that are not…….
So that makes them "healthier" does it? Maybe they should sell them in GNC then.

"Less Dangerous" would be more appropiate…no?
markie
Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 13178
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end... February 13, 2004 at 07:33 PM UTC #
healthier is such a flakey term……

Is pot healthier than drinking? Well it probably would be if you didnt smoke it in combination with tobacco. A nice delivery system and things would be great.

GNC would be fine as most of the drugs we are talking about here are natural plant extracts.
walkman
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end... February 13, 2004 at 07:33 PM UTC #
we can meet up before the TV on the Radio show, thirsty…nothing goes together quite like crank and indie rock.
thirsty moore
Joined: January 11, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 6131
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end... February 13, 2004 at 07:38 PM UTC #
Way to put it! As for me, I'll just stick with my liquor and ovaltine.

Originally posted by walkie hearts you all:
nothing goes together quite like crank and indie rock.
Celeste
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end... February 13, 2004 at 07:45 PM UTC #
Originally posted by mark e smith:
healthier is such a flakey term……

Is pot healthier than drinking? Well it probably would be if you didnt smoke it in combination with tobacco. A nice delivery system and things would be great.

GNC would be fine as most of the drugs we are talking about here are natural plant extracts.
how about low-fat brownies or oatmeal cookies?
markie
Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 13178
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end... February 13, 2004 at 07:48 PM UTC #
Originally posted by Celeste:
how about low-fat brownies or oatmeal cookies?
You have to be careful eating the stuff. It is much easier to get a lethal dose/get sick/ be high for 24 hours…..

Not highly recommended. Still if you dont smoke and only eat a little, it works well with a couple of beers.
mankie
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end... February 13, 2004 at 08:11 PM UTC #
Originally posted by thirsty moore:
[QB] ovaltine.



Now your talking my drug baby!
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end... February 13, 2004 at 11:09 PM UTC #
Mankie is off his lollies, today…best not listen to him.
← Back to board