iPod and aiff

Did you convert the already ripped MP3s up to loseless?  How did that work?

thirsty wrote:
Top for lossless appreciation. Converted some albums over to apple lossless last night. Far better sound coming out of the iPod and sounddock now.
Unfortunately you can't convert mp3 to lossless. I ripped some cds of mine in apple lossless and then loaded them on my iPod.
thirsty wrote:
Unfortunately you can't convert mp3 to lossless.
Oh no, you can. It's the quickest way to get booted off any torrent network.
No. Once that data has been stripped away with a conversion to mp3, it's impossible to bring it back.

nkotb wrote:
Did you convert the already ripped MP3s up to loseless?  How did that work?

thirsty wrote:
Top for lossless appreciation. Converted some albums over to apple lossless last night. Far better sound coming out of the iPod and sounddock now.

Yeah, I didn't think so.

azaghal1981 wrote:
No. Once that data has been stripped away with a conversion to mp3, it's impossible to bring it back.

nkotb wrote:
Did you convert the already ripped MP3s up to loseless?  How did that work?

thirsty wrote:
Top for lossless appreciation. Converted some albums over to apple lossless last night. Far better sound coming out of the iPod and sounddock now.


Technically you can. There are programs (and why they'll exist I'll never know) that will take the mp3 back to wav and then automatically make a flac of it. It, of course, retains the quality loss of the original mp3 file.

This transcoding is more commonly seen on networks (like the old oink) that have bitrate requirements and someone trying to re-encode 128kbps mp3s up to 192 or whatever. The double mp3'ing of the music actually, in that case, has a multiplier effect on the quality loss.
Right, I knew that it was technically possible.  I just came into this topic late and only read his comment about "converting" and thought it was some newfangled technology that you kids were into.

Julian, wrote:
Technically you can. There are programs (and why they'll exist I'll never know) that will take the mp3 back to wav and then automatically make a flac of it. It, of course, retains the quality loss of the original mp3 file.

This transcoding is more commonly seen on networks (like the old oink) that have bitrate requirements and someone trying to re-encode 128kbps mp3s up to 192 or whatever. The double mp3'ing of the music actually, in that case, has a multiplier effect on the quality loss.
Top. This stuff only gets better with age. Halfway through my music collection. Tonight I might tackle Sonic Youth.