sonickteam2
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Top 100 Singles of 2003
January 06, 2004 at 03:31 PM UTC
#
ok, i overreacted.
- this is my biggest hobby and i get a little defensive of it.
i shouldnt be mad just cause mankie is an old wanker.
(and fugitive motel was 313, but it was out late and will be in next years too, much higher)
thirsty moore
Joined: January 11, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 6131
Re: Top 100 Singles of 2003
January 06, 2004 at 03:36 PM UTC
#
I actually realized that one after I posted it. Sonick, go get a vag, or else I'm looking like an ass.
For the record, I open doors for women. And I have african american friends. I'm awesome, aren't I.
Originally posted by mankie:
Originally posted by thirsty moore:
[QB] It's called chivalry, dude.
Is sonickteam a lady, or are you just proving that doodles have no clue what chivalry is?
Samantha
Joined: August 30, 2002 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1438
Re: Top 100 Singles of 2003
January 06, 2004 at 03:47 PM UTC
#
I think it's a cool idea. I wish I had that kind of dedication and access to that much music. where do you get your mp3s? I'm attempting eDonkey, but the selection sucks, and it takes ages. although I'm getting a ton of Cure…I guess eDonkey users are 80's goth fans, explaining why I can't get any new bands.
Samantha
Joined: August 30, 2002 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1438
Re: Top 100 Singles of 2003
January 06, 2004 at 03:59 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by sonickteam2:
Originally posted by Samantha:
where do you get your mp3s?
80% Soulseek
the rest i try insound.com or type in a yahoo or google search.
ex. radiohead there there mp3
it sometimes works!
plus we have 20 people so some i can get from them.
what is the link for soulseek?
Samantha
Joined: August 30, 2002 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1438
Re: Top 100 Singles of 2003
January 06, 2004 at 04:07 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by sonickteam2:
http://www.slsknet.org/
its a P2P so you'll have to download the program, but it has run great for me. and the only songs i cant find on it are ones that the album hasnt come out, or unless its REALLY rare.
thanks man, I needed a new P2P
sonickteam2
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Top 100 Singles of 2003
January 06, 2004 at 04:14 PM UTC
#
no problem. :)
I was using WinMX but once I got Soulseek i have never looked back.
Not that i actually download music illegally though! :eek:
Samantha
Joined: August 30, 2002 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1438
Re: Top 100 Singles of 2003
January 06, 2004 at 04:19 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by sonickteam2:
no problem. :)
I was using WinMX but once I got Soulseek i have never looked back.
Not that i actually download music illegally though! :eek:
I went from napster, to audiogalaxy, to kazaa, all of which died only months after I started using them. I think maybe I'm cursed…or America is run by greedy corporate bastards. something like that.
thirsty moore
Joined: January 11, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 6131
Re: Top 100 Singles of 2003
January 06, 2004 at 04:46 PM UTC
#
Your main man Bowie has an interesting take.
http://www.studioforrecording.org/mt/archive/000033.html ""I don't even know why I would want to be on a label in a
few years, because I don't think it's going to work by labels and by
distribution systems in the same way," he said. "The absolute
transformation of everything that we ever thought about music will
take place within 10 years, and nothing is going to be able to stop
it. I see absolutely no point in pretending that it's not going to
happen. I'm fully confident that copyright, for instance, will no
longer exist in 10 years, and authorship and intellectual property is
in for such a bashing."
sonickteam2
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Top 100 Singles of 2003
January 06, 2004 at 04:47 PM UTC
#
mankie can NEVER stay on topic.
ever
ggw
Joined: December 16, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 14237
Re: Top 100 Singles of 2003
January 06, 2004 at 04:48 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by thirsty moore:
Your main man Bowie has an interesting take.
http://www.studioforrecording.org/mt/archive/000033.html
""I don't even know why I would want to be on a label in a
few years, because I don't think it's going to work by labels and by
distribution systems in the same way," he said. "The absolute
transformation of everything that we ever thought about music will
take place within 10 years, and nothing is going to be able to stop
it. I see absolutely no point in pretending that it's not going to
happen. I'm fully confident that copyright, for instance, will no
longer exist in 10 years, and authorship and intellectual property is
in for such a bashing."
Bowie already cashed out by securitizing his future royalties. What does he care if copyright exists anymore?
Samantha
Joined: August 30, 2002 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1438
Re: Top 100 Singles of 2003
January 06, 2004 at 04:49 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by mankie:
Or maybe the musicians would like to profit from their talents. :roll: (here we go again)
you mean the studios. I think I'll buy their t-shirts instead.
I'm not going to get into this argument though…I buy as much music as my tiny budget will allow, and do very little downloading. I only download a few songs from a new band to get a taste and decide what to buy, or to get unreleased recordings/live songs. I'm a huge fan of album art, which you can't download!
ggw
Joined: December 16, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 14237
Re: Top 100 Singles of 2003
January 06, 2004 at 04:50 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by Samantha:
I'm not going to get into this argument though…
Because you'll obviously lose?
thirsty moore
Joined: January 11, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 6131
Re: Top 100 Singles of 2003
January 06, 2004 at 04:53 PM UTC
#
Yes you can. See the Que Estas Esuchando thread.
Originally posted by Samantha:
I'm a huge fan of album art, which you can't download!