grateful
Joined: October 15, 2008 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 11564
Re: Multiple men's fashion fails
March 07, 2018 at 11:07 PM UTC
#
evilizac wrote:
Shoe questions: I have wide feet - Are there slimming styles? Also are there ways to… Jazz up a boring shoe toe box?
How out are blue suede shoes?
You want to look for longer shoes that taper to a point. These will de-emphasize the extra wide feet, and give the illusion of a slimmer size.
grateful
Joined: October 15, 2008 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 11564
Re: Multiple men's fashion fails
March 07, 2018 at 11:09 PM UTC
#
Like this:

hutch
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Multiple men's fashion fails
March 07, 2018 at 11:29 PM UTC
#
Damn I thought frank Gallagher was old
walkonbyeeeeeeeee
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Multiple men's fashion fails
March 08, 2018 at 04:35 AM UTC
#
Do people on here–like the elder folk, like sweet cell, like van smack, like Julian, like whoever the hell else I'm forgetting–think about the old people and wonder if they still look here, if they still peruse what we're talking about in 2018, if they're still wishing they could type and could post but they feel it's over, that the time has come when it should stop and what are they doing and why aren't they doing it and what's going on?
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Multiple men's fashion fails
March 08, 2018 at 09:47 PM UTC
#
I am still in touch with many people who no longer post here. Sometimes it's just through other social media avenues, others it's through almost daily texts.
I had dinner with Markie a few months ago, but Mankie and I stopped talking about Manchester United a while ago. It's probably been over 5 years since I've talked to him.
And also, the socks match the "slacks" comment is hilraious in 2018.
Thousand Made-Up Loves
Joined: September 14, 2008 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1551
Re: Multiple men's fashion fails
March 09, 2018 at 05:25 PM UTC
#
vansmack wrote:
And also, the socks match the "slacks" comment is hilraious in 2018.
Great thread, forgot I even made this post.
And of course, it's still accurate. It's almost as bad as guys not matching their shoes and belts. Who dresses you?
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: Multiple men's fashion fails
March 09, 2018 at 06:23 PM UTC
#
Thousand wrote:
Great thread, forgot I even made this post.
And of course, it's still accurate.
This ship has sailed and for a couple years now, colorful socks have far outpaced colorful slacks. Thankfully.
Thousand wrote:
It's almost as bad as guys not matching their shoes and belts. Who dresses you?
This one I will absolutely agree with. Unless it's a white belt.
sweetcell
Joined: July 18, 2006 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 22608
Re: Multiple men's fashion fails
March 16, 2018 at 11:55 PM UTC
#
walkonbyeeeeeeeee wrote:
Do people on here–like the elder folk, like sweet cell, like van smack, like Julian, like whoever the hell else I'm forgetting–think about the old people and wonder if they still look here, if they still peruse what we're talking about in 2018, if they're still wishing they could type and could post but they feel it's over, that the time has come when it should stop and what are they doing and why aren't they doing it and what's going on?
first, i resent being called "elder". i think. dunno. and get off my lawn.
anyways, smakie goes and posts this:
vansmack wrote:
dave24 wrote:
Speaking of non-transferable, what's up with all those Super Excellent seats on Stubhub for this show?
Because, ChokeyChicken is real.
which answer the question: no, i don't often think about past regulars.
walkonbyeeeeeeeee
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Multiple men's fashion fails
March 18, 2018 at 06:57 AM UTC
#
I, like to think of them. And elder . . . means power, and one to look up to.
Gurl.