DeathFromAbove1979
Joined: November 29, 2006 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5038
The Grammys
December 07, 2012 at 02:55 PM UTC
#
I'm perplexed, I've heard 4 of the 5 best album of the year nominees and I own 3 of them…
[El Camino, Blunderbuss, Channel Orange]
Have I just not paid attention to The Grammys in a long time or are they all hipsters now?
The Black Keys? Frank Ocean? Jack White? Fun.? Mumford & Sons?
I feel like they were all nominated last year as well…. Either way, I feel like they're pouring a lot of nominations on these artists… I don't like it. Fuck The Grammys.
hutch
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: The Grammys
December 07, 2012 at 02:58 PM UTC
#
El Camino is up this year?
DeathFromAbove1979
Joined: November 29, 2006 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5038
Re: The Grammys
December 07, 2012 at 03:01 PM UTC
#
It's up for just about everything it can be nominated for. I love all the albums, I just think it's weird. It's not that I don't give those artists credit for being popular, I just see an out of touch commitee nominating what the internet was swooning over most of the year and I guess the radio as well. I guess that's what they're based on though….. Just weird. I don't think in all my years that I've liked this many albums that were nominated…
Also Rick Ross and 2 Chainz being nominated for Best Rap Album is a fucking joke.
HoyaSaxa03
Joined: March 22, 2004 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 7053
Re: The Grammys
December 07, 2012 at 03:28 PM UTC
#
James Ford
Joined: July 22, 2009 at 09:02 PM UTC
Posts: 5620
Re: The Grammys
December 07, 2012 at 03:33 PM UTC
#
all suck
DeathFromAbove1979 wrote:
The Black Keys? Frank Ocean? Jack White? Fun.? Mumford & Sons?
jrho
Joined: May 30, 2010 at 12:51 AM UTC
Posts: 112
Re: The Grammys
December 07, 2012 at 03:33 PM UTC
#
I continue to be confused by what the hell the different categories mean.
DeathFromAbove1979
Joined: November 29, 2006 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5038
Re: The Grammys
December 07, 2012 at 03:35 PM UTC
#
James wrote:
all suck
DeathFromAbove1979 wrote:
The Black Keys? Frank Ocean? Jack White? Fun.? Mumford & Sons?
I mean, I know, they're all nominated for Grammys! I've already deleted all the albums I have that are theirs. Their earlier stuff was way better anyway.
DeathFromAbove1979
Joined: November 29, 2006 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5038
Re: The Grammys
December 07, 2012 at 03:45 PM UTC
#
hutch wrote:
jrho wrote:
I continue to be confused by what the hell the different categories mean.
i think the record companies put their artists up for categories they think they can win so in essence they mean nothing….. for example dr john locked down should be up for best rock record but i guess they felt they couldn't get the nomination so it went in for blues where it did get nominated
How the fuck is Colplay nominated for "Best Rock Album" <- moms listen to that shit. FUCKING MOMS.
K8teebug
Joined: August 03, 2004 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4126
Re: The Grammys
December 07, 2012 at 04:08 PM UTC
#
atomicfront wrote:
HoyaSaxa03 wrote:
http://pitchfork.com/news/48851-grizzly-bears-ed-droste-upset-about-grammys-justin-vernon-reminds-him-grammys-are-bullshit/
of course then there is pitchfork which is even more BS. Anyway I never saw the appeal of Grizzly Bear.
Maybe it's because Grizzly Bear sucks.
James Ford
Joined: July 22, 2009 at 09:02 PM UTC
Posts: 5620
Re: The Grammys
December 07, 2012 at 04:16 PM UTC
#
Their earlier stuff sucked as well.
DeathFromAbove1979 wrote:
James wrote:
all suck
DeathFromAbove1979 wrote:
The Black Keys? Frank Ocean? Jack White? Fun.? Mumford & Sons?
I mean, I know, they're all nominated for Grammys! I've already deleted all the albums I have that are theirs. Their earlier stuff was way better anyway.
bunnyman
Joined: November 19, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5542
Re: The Grammys
December 07, 2012 at 05:22 PM UTC
#
The Grammys mean nothing. They have about as much to do with music as MTV does.
Space Freely
Joined: December 13, 2014 at 07:28 PM UTC
Posts: 11019
Re: The Grammys
March 15, 2021 at 02:53 AM UTC
#
DeathFromAbove1979 wrote:
hutch wrote:
jrho wrote:
I continue to be confused by what the hell the different categories mean.
i think the record companies put their artists up for categories they think they can win so in essence they mean nothing….. for example dr john locked down should be up for best rock record but i guess they felt they couldn't get the nomination so it went in for blues where it did get nominated
How the fuck is Colplay nominated for "Best Rock Album" <- moms listen to that shit. FUCKING MOMS.
How the fuck are they nominated for Album of the Year in 2021? FUCKING MOMS!
hutch
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: The Grammys
March 15, 2021 at 11:26 AM UTC
#
Look at me trying to explain shit in 2012 only to be ignored and answered with jokes and one liners!
Nothing has changed
Space Freely
Joined: December 13, 2014 at 07:28 PM UTC
Posts: 11019
Re: The Grammys
March 15, 2021 at 12:31 PM UTC
#
hutch wrote:
Look at me trying to explain shit in 2012 only to be ignored and answered with jokes and one liners!
Nothing has changed
No arguments here. I think my people my daughter's age are the target audience. Not people who have spent 30 or 40 years being music fans.
Do you still play that Dr. John record?
hutch
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: The Grammys
March 15, 2021 at 12:56 PM UTC
#
It’s been a while but I can recall it in my head right now
I guess I sort of burnt out on dr john!
But it really is a rock album.. to call it blues is pushing it
Sidehatch
Joined: October 04, 2011 at 04:33 AM UTC
Posts: 25687
Re: The Grammys
March 15, 2021 at 08:57 PM UTC
#
Just 8.8 million people tuned into the Grammy Awards on CBS this year, a new all-time low
Prior to Sunday, 2006 was the lowest-rated Grammy Awards with 17 million viewers.