atomicfront's Thread of Contrarianism?

Fuck yeah and what are you gonna do about it besides bitch on the internet?

Nothing.

Hail To The Redskins!
DeathFromAbove1979 wrote:
Fuck yeah and what are you gonna do about it besides bitch on the internet?

Nothing.

Hail To The Redskins!


You sir are banned from this thread. 
Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuckkkkkk does that mean I can't keep posting in here?
DeathFromAbove1979 wrote:
Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuckkkkkk does that mean I can't keep posting in here?


Yeah you have to post in threads like "This is what Peter Buck Played in his boring DJ set" and "I eat bacon because I am short and bald" threads.
Atomicfront sure has some fascination with short bald dudes.  Tell us why.
DeathFromAbove1979 wrote:
Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuckkkkkk does that mean I can't keep posting in here?


The funny thing is that I hold the key to this thread and can delete it at any time (and so could a mod, of course). I'd hand the key over if there was a way.
wml7 wrote:
Atomicfront sure has some fascination with short bald dudes.  Tell us why.


They get all the chicks.
atomicfront wrote:
DeathFromAbove1979 wrote:
Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuckkkkkk does that mean I can't keep posting in here?


Yeah you have to post in threads like "This is what Peter Buck Played in his boring DJ set" and "I eat bacon because I am short and bald" threads.

Who the fuck is Peter Buck?
Peter Buck was in REM… He wasn't the short bald guy though.
do you like rem?  god . . . i used to worship them, and i mean worship like those stupid high school girls from the late eighties would worship them.  i bark at the thought of that now.  having your own thread, is better than orgasm, but only once.
atomicfront wrote:
DeathFromAbove1979 wrote:
atomicfront wrote:
thatguy wrote:
vansmack wrote:
stevewizzle wrote:
holy fuck that redskins photo is epic


What if I told you he was participating in the sound guys commercial break playing Gary Glitter's  "Rock and Roll Parts One and Two" and just simply chanting "Hey!"?


it was during "hail to the redskins," and i was yelling "FIGHT!"

that said, it was at the hall of fame game.  we were very excited for a completely meaningless game.  and we were on the front page of the canton newspaper for it.


Please don't use the offensive name "Reds***s" in my thread.  The new name is going to be "Redtails".   

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/dc-council-may-push-washington-redskins-into-washington-redtails/2013/04/30/456cb72c-b1a7-11e2-bbf2-a6f9e9d79e19_story.html?hpid=z2

Fuck your thread

HAIL TO THE REDSKINS!!!


Racist


Go RGIII!

http://washington.cbslocal.com/2013/05/01/rgiii-americans-held-hostage-by-the-tyranny-of-political-correctness/
Yada wrote:
atomicfront wrote:
DeathFromAbove1979 wrote:
atomicfront wrote:
thatguy wrote:
vansmack wrote:
stevewizzle wrote:
holy fuck that redskins photo is epic


What if I told you he was participating in the sound guys commercial break playing Gary Glitter's  "Rock and Roll Parts One and Two" and just simply chanting "Hey!"?


it was during "hail to the redskins," and i was yelling "FIGHT!"

that said, it was at the hall of fame game.  we were very excited for a completely meaningless game.  and we were on the front page of the canton newspaper for it.


Please don't use the offensive name "Reds***s" in my thread.  The new name is going to be "Redtails".   

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/dc-council-may-push-washington-redskins-into-washington-redtails/2013/04/30/456cb72c-b1a7-11e2-bbf2-a6f9e9d79e19_story.html?hpid=z2

Fuck your thread

HAIL TO THE REDSKINS!!!


Racist


Go RGIII!

http://washington.cbslocal.com/2013/05/01/rgiii-americans-held-hostage-by-the-tyranny-of-political-correctness/


Is Ratbastard actually RGIII?
walkonby wrote:
do you like rem?  god . . . i used to worship them, and i mean worship like those stupid high school girls from the late eighties would worship them.  i bark at the thought of that now.  having your own thread, is better than orgasm, but only once.


I liked them until I saw them in 1984 and there were no hot chicks in attendance.  And I thought "how can they be any good if hot chicks dont' like them?"
atomicfront wrote:
walkonby wrote:
do you like rem?  god . . . i used to worship them, and i mean worship like those stupid high school girls from the late eighties would worship them.  i bark at the thought of that now.  having your own thread, is better than orgasm, but only once.


I liked them until I saw them in 1984 and there were no hot chicks in attendance.  And I thought "how can they be any good if hot chicks dont' like them?"

so wait, it's not about whether you like them or not - it's whether others (in this case, "hot chicks") like them or not?  how is that any different then basing your opinion on online reviews?

another insights into atomicfront's taste decisions… awesome.
The mullet to hot chick ratio didn't work in his favor
;D
sweetcell wrote:
atomicfront wrote:
walkonby wrote:
do you like rem?  god . . . i used to worship them, and i mean worship like those stupid high school girls from the late eighties would worship them.  i bark at the thought of that now.  having your own thread, is better than orgasm, but only once.


I liked them until I saw them in 1984 and there were no hot chicks in attendance.  And I thought "how can they be any good if hot chicks dont' like them?"

so wait, it's not about whether you like them or not - it's whether others (in this case, "hot chicks") like them or not?  how is that any different then basing your opinion on online reviews?

another insights into atomicfront's taste decisions… awesome.


Hmm changing your taste based on hot chicks versus changing your taste on what some geeky guy who lives in his parents basements opinions.  I would say that is quite different.
wml7 wrote:
The mullet to hot chick ratio didn't work in his favor
;D


I never had a mullet damnit!!! 
atomicfront wrote:
sweetcell wrote:
atomicfront wrote:
walkonby wrote:
do you like rem?  god . . . i used to worship them, and i mean worship like those stupid high school girls from the late eighties would worship them.  i bark at the thought of that now.  having your own thread, is better than orgasm, but only once.


I liked them until I saw them in 1984 and there were no hot chicks in attendance.  And I thought "how can they be any good if hot chicks dont' like them?"

so wait, it's not about whether you like them or not - it's whether others (in this case, "hot chicks") like them or not?  how is that any different then basing your opinion on online reviews?

another insights into atomicfront's taste decisions… awesome.


Hmm changing your taste based on hot chicks versus changing your taste on what some geeky guy who lives in his parents basements opinions.  I would say that is quite different.

What about a super cool guy who lives in his parents attic?
DeathFromAbove1979 wrote:
atomicfront wrote:
sweetcell wrote:
atomicfront wrote:
walkonby wrote:
do you like rem?  god . . . i used to worship them, and i mean worship like those stupid high school girls from the late eighties would worship them.  i bark at the thought of that now.  having your own thread, is better than orgasm, but only once.


I liked them until I saw them in 1984 and there were no hot chicks in attendance.  And I thought "how can they be any good if hot chicks dont' like them?"

so wait, it's not about whether you like them or not - it's whether others (in this case, "hot chicks") like them or not?  how is that any different then basing your opinion on online reviews?

another insights into atomicfront's taste decisions… awesome.


Hmm changing your taste based on hot chicks versus changing your taste on what some geeky guy who lives in his parents basements opinions.  I would say that is quite different.

What about a super cool guy who lives in his parents attic?


Is that you? 
atomicfront wrote:
wml7 wrote:
The mullet to hot chick ratio didn't work in his favor
;D


I never had a mullet damnit!!! 

thou doth protest too much, methinks.