atomic
Joined: August 27, 2013 at 01:49 PM UTC
Posts: 2093
Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
August 29, 2013 at 01:47 PM UTC
#
sweetcell wrote:
atomic wrote:
I think
false.
atomic wrote:
that a woman who produces and directs her own show where she is nude more often than she is clothed enjoys being looked at judged as being a thing to procreate with.
or, maybe, you know, she just likes being nude. or she isn't all hung up about it - we spend some of our time without clothes on in the real world, but not on puritan TV (how many women do you know who tuck the bed sheet under their armpits all the time like they do on TV? this woman is just keepsing it real). or she doesn't think that being without clothes is an invitation to sex.
atomic wrote:
When I was under 30 I got hit on by gay men constantly. Once I hit 30 they stopped. I am guessing gay men are at least as shallow as straight men.
or maybe you started looking like hell when you hit 30. if so, i can only imagine what kind of a mess you are now in your 40's (or is it 50's?).
i really need to update my blocking script… but for the moment i'm enjoying your idiocy again.
I still get hit on by attractive girls in their early 20's when I go out. I might have started looking like shit in your opinion when I got to my 30's. But perhaps women don't only look at physical appearance. Well perhaps they look at a tall muscular guy with blonde hair who istylish and they don't notice the other stuff. But I am guessing I look better than a lot of people on here with the food they eat. Hot wings and Bacon is going to make you look like shit. Looking back at people I knew when I was 18 there is no corelation between how you looked at 18 and how you looked at 45. It is how you treat your body.
wml7
Joined: February 19, 2004 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3064
Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
August 29, 2013 at 02:34 PM UTC
#
Atomic
;D

slappy
Joined: October 16, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 999
Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
August 29, 2013 at 02:46 PM UTC
#
But you said you'll take the one in green, like
you're doing her some kind of favor.
Sounds like today JF thinks last week JF is pathetic.
James wrote:
The other two phrases a totally misogynistic. And the way they phrase it, as if it's automatically assumed that she's going to want to fuck them, like they're doing her some kind of favor, is what's most pathetic.
James wrote:
I'll take the one in green, thanks. And the other two over Lena.
The one on the right is the daughter of NBC news anchor Brian Williams, right?
atomic
Joined: August 27, 2013 at 01:49 PM UTC
Posts: 2093
Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
August 29, 2013 at 03:30 PM UTC
#
slappy wrote:
But you said you'll take the one in green, like you're doing her some kind of favor.
Sounds like today JF thinks last week JF is pathetic.
James wrote:
The other two phrases a totally misogynistic. And the way they phrase it, as if it's automatically assumed that she's going to want to fuck them, like they're doing her some kind of favor, is what's most pathetic.
James wrote:
I'll take the one in green, thanks. And the other two over Lena.
The one on the right is the daughter of NBC news anchor Brian Williams, right?
His wife had a talk with him about his post.
James Ford
Joined: July 22, 2009 at 09:02 PM UTC
Posts: 5620
Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
August 29, 2013 at 03:35 PM UTC
#
There's a difference between "I want to take you home tonight and fuck your brains out." as opposed to "innocently flirting with a middle aged man who has no shot at me."
It's funny how you don't seem to get the difference.
atomic wrote:
sweetcell wrote:
atomic wrote:
I think
false.
atomic wrote:
that a woman who produces and directs her own show where she is nude more often than she is clothed enjoys being looked at judged as being a thing to procreate with.
or, maybe, you know, she just likes being nude. or she isn't all hung up about it - we spend some of our time without clothes on in the real world, but not on puritan TV (how many women do you know who tuck the bed sheet under their armpits all the time like they do on TV? this woman is just keepsing it real). or she doesn't think that being without clothes is an invitation to sex.
atomic wrote:
When I was under 30 I got hit on by gay men constantly. Once I hit 30 they stopped. I am guessing gay men are at least as shallow as straight men.
or maybe you started looking like hell when you hit 30. if so, i can only imagine what kind of a mess you are now in your 40's (or is it 50's?).
i really need to update my blocking script… but for the moment i'm enjoying your idiocy again.
I still get hit on by attractive girls in their early 20's when I go out. I might have started looking like shit in your opinion when I got to my 30's. But perhaps women don't only look at physical appearance. Well perhaps they look at a tall muscular guy with blonde hair who istylish and they don't notice the other stuff. But I am guessing I look better than a lot of people on here with the food they eat. Hot wings and Bacon is going to make you look like shit. Looking back at people I knew when I was 18 there is no corelation between how you looked at 18 and how you looked at 45. It is how you treat your body.
James Ford
Joined: July 22, 2009 at 09:02 PM UTC
Posts: 5620
Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
August 29, 2013 at 03:38 PM UTC
#
I'd take her if she'd have me, if I were single, which I previously stated that I was not.
slappy wrote:
But you said you'll take the one in green, like you're doing her some kind of favor.
Sounds like today JF thinks last week JF is pathetic.
James wrote:
The other two phrases a totally misogynistic. And the way they phrase it, as if it's automatically assumed that she's going to want to fuck them, like they're doing her some kind of favor, is what's most pathetic.
James wrote:
I'll take the one in green, thanks. And the other two over Lena.
The one on the right is the daughter of NBC news anchor Brian Williams, right?
atomic
Joined: August 27, 2013 at 01:49 PM UTC
Posts: 2093
Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
August 29, 2013 at 03:42 PM UTC
#
You also told me I was an idiot for finding a woman attractive.
James Ford
Joined: July 22, 2009 at 09:02 PM UTC
Posts: 5620
Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
August 29, 2013 at 04:00 PM UTC
#
Actually, it was my wife who said you were an idiot (and i quoted it that way), and she said in in response to you PREFERRING Lena to the others.
I happen to agree with her that Lena is the least attractive of the four. I think it's another example of your bad taste, but i don't think that bad taste in women makes you an idiot like bad taste in beer does ;)
Hence, I wouldn't call you an idiot for preferring her.
Wow, i can't believe i took the time to type that.
atomic wrote:
You also told me I was an idiot for finding a woman attractive.
grateful
Joined: October 15, 2008 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 11564
Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
August 29, 2013 at 04:21 PM UTC
#
James wrote:
Wow, i can't believe i took the time to type that.
and I to read that.
i am gay and i like cats
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
August 29, 2013 at 04:25 PM UTC
#
and i not knowing anything about what you are talking about. i grew bored of this thread, and just now glance at thinigs.
atomic
Joined: August 27, 2013 at 01:49 PM UTC
Posts: 2093
Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
August 29, 2013 at 04:55 PM UTC
#
walkonby wrote:
and i not knowing anything about what you are talking about. i grew bored of this thread, and just now glance at thinigs.
We will a dude next to make things more.interesting.
i am gay and i like cats
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
August 29, 2013 at 04:58 PM UTC
#
see . . . you did it, again.
atomic
Joined: August 27, 2013 at 01:49 PM UTC
Posts: 2093
Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
August 29, 2013 at 05:14 PM UTC
#
walkonby wrote:
see . . . you did it, again.
Using a phone and I hit period by mistake…..Not trying to steal your thunder.
atomic
Joined: August 27, 2013 at 01:49 PM UTC
Posts: 2093
Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
August 29, 2013 at 05:47 PM UTC
#
James wrote:
Actually, it was my wife who said you were an idiot (and i quoted it that way), and she said in in response to you PREFERRING Lena to the others.
I happen to agree with her that Lena is the least attractive of the four. I think it's another example of your bad taste, but i don't think that bad taste in women makes you an idiot like bad taste in beer does ;)
Hence, I wouldn't call you an idiot for preferring her.
Wow, i can't believe i took the time to type that.
atomic wrote:
You also told me I was an idiot for finding a woman attractive.
How could it be bad taste to find someone attractive. And you just ranked the chicks on the show by the way they look. Does that make you creepy or pathetic? I forget which one you stated.
It isn't bad taste to like beer that you like because of the way it tastes. And my favorite beers don't use a bunch of adjuncts like the american beers you prefer. So they are probably healthier. And this is my own opinion. I am not using someone else's opinion to tell me what beers to like. That would be idiotic. People on that site are all sheep. I read a review of one Heifweizen on there and they were all talking about the orange peel and corriander flavors they tasted. Yeah too bad it doesn't have any of those flavors in it.
ggw
Joined: December 16, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 14237
Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
August 29, 2013 at 05:48 PM UTC
#
Visible tattoos = ugly
Relaxer
Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5410
Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
August 29, 2013 at 07:28 PM UTC
#
atomic
Joined: August 27, 2013 at 01:49 PM UTC
Posts: 2093
Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
August 29, 2013 at 07:34 PM UTC
#
Relaxer wrote:
Here you guys go, and you don't even have to rape her.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/28/ania-lisewska_n_3831495.html

Gross.
Yada
Joined: February 05, 2003 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 12418
Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
May 29, 2015 at 03:35 PM UTC
#
jrpa
Joined: September 03, 2013 at 03:15 PM UTC
Posts: 29999
Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
May 29, 2015 at 03:41 PM UTC
#
Yada wrote:

No way, Jose.