Would you hit it: part 2?

sweetcell wrote:
atomic wrote:
I think

false.

atomic wrote:
that a woman who produces and directs her own show where she is nude more often than she is clothed enjoys being looked at judged as being a thing to procreate with.

or, maybe, you know, she just likes being nude.  or she isn't all hung up about it - we spend some of our time without clothes on in the real world, but not on puritan TV (how many women do you know who tuck the bed sheet under their armpits all the time like they do on TV? this woman is just keepsing it real).  or she doesn't think that being without clothes is an invitation to sex. 

atomic wrote:
When I was under 30 I got hit on by gay men constantly.  Once I hit 30 they stopped.   I am guessing gay men are at least as shallow as straight men.

or maybe you started looking like hell when you hit 30. if so, i can only imagine what kind of a mess you are now in your 40's (or is it 50's?).

i really need to update my blocking script… but for the moment i'm enjoying your idiocy again.


I still get hit on by attractive girls in their early 20's when I go out.  I might have started looking like shit in your opinion when I got to my 30's.  But perhaps women don't only look at physical appearance.  Well perhaps they look at a tall muscular guy with blonde hair who istylish and they don't notice the other stuff.    But I am guessing I look better than a lot of people on here with the food they eat.  Hot wings and Bacon is going to make you look like shit.  Looking back at people I knew when I was 18 there is no corelation between how you looked at 18 and how you looked at 45.  It is how you treat your body. 
Atomic
;D
But you said you'll take the one in green, like you're doing her some kind of favor.
Sounds like today JF thinks last week JF is pathetic.

James wrote:
The other two phrases a totally misogynistic. And the way they phrase it, as if it's automatically assumed that she's going to want to fuck them, like they're doing her some kind of favor, is what's most pathetic.


James wrote:
I'll take the one in green, thanks. And the other two over Lena.

The one on the right is the daughter of NBC news anchor Brian Williams, right?
slappy wrote:
But you said you'll take the one in green, like you're doing her some kind of favor.
Sounds like today JF thinks last week JF is pathetic.

James wrote:
The other two phrases a totally misogynistic. And the way they phrase it, as if it's automatically assumed that she's going to want to fuck them, like they're doing her some kind of favor, is what's most pathetic.


James wrote:
I'll take the one in green, thanks. And the other two over Lena.

The one on the right is the daughter of NBC news anchor Brian Williams, right?




His wife had a talk with him about his post. 
There's a difference between  "I want to take you home tonight and fuck your brains out." as opposed to "innocently flirting with a middle aged man who has no shot at me."

It's funny how you don't seem to get the difference.


atomic wrote:
sweetcell wrote:
atomic wrote:
I think

false.

atomic wrote:
that a woman who produces and directs her own show where she is nude more often than she is clothed enjoys being looked at judged as being a thing to procreate with.

or, maybe, you know, she just likes being nude.  or she isn't all hung up about it - we spend some of our time without clothes on in the real world, but not on puritan TV (how many women do you know who tuck the bed sheet under their armpits all the time like they do on TV? this woman is just keepsing it real).  or she doesn't think that being without clothes is an invitation to sex. 

atomic wrote:
When I was under 30 I got hit on by gay men constantly.  Once I hit 30 they stopped.   I am guessing gay men are at least as shallow as straight men.

or maybe you started looking like hell when you hit 30. if so, i can only imagine what kind of a mess you are now in your 40's (or is it 50's?).

i really need to update my blocking script… but for the moment i'm enjoying your idiocy again.


I still get hit on by attractive girls in their early 20's when I go out.  I might have started looking like shit in your opinion when I got to my 30's.  But perhaps women don't only look at physical appearance.  Well perhaps they look at a tall muscular guy with blonde hair who istylish and they don't notice the other stuff.    But I am guessing I look better than a lot of people on here with the food they eat.  Hot wings and Bacon is going to make you look like shit.  Looking back at people I knew when I was 18 there is no corelation between how you looked at 18 and how you looked at 45.  It is how you treat your body. 
I'd take her if she'd have me, if I were single, which I previously stated that I was not.

slappy wrote:
But you said you'll take the one in green, like you're doing her some kind of favor.
Sounds like today JF thinks last week JF is pathetic.

James wrote:
The other two phrases a totally misogynistic. And the way they phrase it, as if it's automatically assumed that she's going to want to fuck them, like they're doing her some kind of favor, is what's most pathetic.


James wrote:
I'll take the one in green, thanks. And the other two over Lena.

The one on the right is the daughter of NBC news anchor Brian Williams, right?

You also told me I was an idiot for finding a woman attractive.
Actually, it was my wife who said you were an idiot (and i quoted it that way), and she said in in response to you PREFERRING Lena to the others.

I happen to agree with her that Lena is the least attractive of the four. I think it's another example of your bad taste, but i don't think that bad taste in women makes you an idiot like bad taste in beer does  ;)

Hence, I wouldn't call you an idiot for preferring her.

Wow, i can't believe i took the time to type that.
atomic wrote:
You also told me I was an idiot for finding a woman attractive.
James wrote:
Wow, i can't believe i took the time to type that.


and I to read that.
and i not knowing anything about what you are talking about.  i grew bored of this thread, and just now glance at thinigs.
walkonby wrote:
and i not knowing anything about what you are talking about.  i grew bored of this thread, and just now glance at thinigs.


We will a dude next to make things more.interesting.
see . . . you did it, again.
walkonby wrote:
see . . . you did it, again.


Using a phone and I hit period by mistake…..Not trying to steal your thunder.
James wrote:
Actually, it was my wife who said you were an idiot (and i quoted it that way), and she said in in response to you PREFERRING Lena to the others.

I happen to agree with her that Lena is the least attractive of the four. I think it's another example of your bad taste, but i don't think that bad taste in women makes you an idiot like bad taste in beer does  ;)

Hence, I wouldn't call you an idiot for preferring her.

Wow, i can't believe i took the time to type that.
atomic wrote:
You also told me I was an idiot for finding a woman attractive.



How could it be bad taste to find someone attractive.  And you just ranked the chicks on the show by the way they look.  Does that make you creepy or pathetic?  I forget which one you stated.


It isn't bad taste to like beer that you like because of the way it tastes.  And my favorite beers don't use a bunch of adjuncts like the american beers you prefer.  So they are probably healthier.  And this is my own opinion.  I am not using someone else's opinion to tell me what beers to like.  That would be idiotic.  People on that site are all sheep.  I read a review of one Heifweizen on there and they were all talking about the orange peel and corriander flavors they tasted.  Yeah too bad it doesn't have any of those flavors in it. 
Visible tattoos = ugly
atomic wrote:
walkonby wrote:
see . . . you did it, again.


Using a phone and I hit period by mistake…..Not trying to steal your thunder.


oh ok.  whew.
Yada wrote:

No way, Jose.