Would you hit it: part 2?

Yada

Joined: February 05, 2003 at 06:01 AM UTC

Posts: 12418

Re: Would you hit it: part 2? March 01, 2016 at 09:31 PM UTC #

May or may not be work friendly, depending on where you work…

A nice walk down memory lane.

http://imgur.com/a/Uxug4

vansmack

Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC

Posts: 19725

Re: Would you hit it: part 2? March 01, 2016 at 10:06 PM UTC #

I don't have the time right now to go through all of them, but I'm sure there's one or two I wouldn't hit.

Yada

Joined: February 05, 2003 at 06:01 AM UTC

Posts: 12418

Re: Would you hit it: part 2? March 01, 2016 at 10:07 PM UTC #

vansmack wrote:
I don't have the time right now to go through all of them, but I'm sure there's one or two I wouldn't hit.

pretty great history in the evolution of pubic hair styles as well.

Yada

Joined: February 05, 2003 at 06:01 AM UTC

Posts: 12418

Re: Would you hit it: part 2? February 07, 2017 at 03:00 PM UTC #

hutch

Joined: Unknown

Posts: 0

Re: Would you hit it: part 2? February 07, 2017 at 04:42 PM UTC #

middle

sweetcell

Joined: July 18, 2006 at 05:01 AM UTC

Posts: 22608

Re: Would you hit it: part 2? February 07, 2017 at 05:31 PM UTC #

smackie, what's the rule for max age? twice yours minus 17?

Space Freely

Joined: December 13, 2014 at 07:28 PM UTC

Posts: 11019

Re: Would you hit it: part 2? February 07, 2017 at 05:33 PM UTC #

The best thing about being as old as I am is there are no rules. Except the ones you make together with your wife.

hutch

Joined: Unknown

Posts: 0

Re: Would you hit it: part 2? February 07, 2017 at 07:59 PM UTC #

Space wrote:
The best thing about being as old as I am is there are no rules. Except the ones you make together with your wife.

that is a pretty big rule dude..

vansmack

Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC

Posts: 19725

Re: Would you hit it: part 2? February 07, 2017 at 08:01 PM UTC #

sweetcell wrote:
smackie, what's the rule for max age?  twice yours minus 17?

That's a mom (63) and her two daughters (18, 31). There's no rule on the planet that would keep Smackie away from that.

hutch

Joined: Unknown

Posts: 0

Re: Would you hit it: part 2? February 07, 2017 at 08:02 PM UTC #

let me guess that is that loser alcoholic Billy Joel's ugly daughter?

Low ratings for this SI cover..very low..

ggw

Joined: December 16, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC

Posts: 14237

Re: Would you hit it: part 2? February 07, 2017 at 08:48 PM UTC #

Yada wrote:

Christie Brinkley is Jesus?

Sidehatch

Joined: October 04, 2011 at 04:33 AM UTC

Posts: 25687

Re: Would you hit it: part 2? February 08, 2017 at 03:10 AM UTC #

ggw wrote:

Christie Brinkley is Jesus?

Seriously, that all I could think about looking at that photo

hutch

Joined: Unknown

Posts: 0

Re: Would you hit it: part 2? February 08, 2017 at 03:14 AM UTC #

AmericanCarnage wrote:
ggw wrote:

Christie Brinkley is Jesus?

Seriously, that all I could think about looking at that photo

if that is all you think about you got a serious problem hombre…

DeathFromAbove1979

Joined: November 29, 2006 at 06:01 AM UTC

Posts: 5038

Re: Would you hit it: part 2? February 08, 2017 at 04:11 PM UTC #

AmericanCarnage wrote:
ggw wrote:

Christie Brinkley is Jesus?

Seriously, that all I could think about looking at that photo

I couldn't stop staring