Atomic is the biggest troll on this board. It's a landslide. If he claims he isn't one, he's delusional.
But these things don't really work without trolls, so there's that.
But these things don't really work without trolls, so there's that.
chaz wrote:Uh, James Ford??
Atomic is the biggest troll on this board. It's a landslide. If he claims he isn't one, he's delusional.
But these things don't really work without trolls, so there's that.
Julian, wrote:chaz wrote:Uh, James Ford??
Atomic is the biggest troll on this board. It's a landslide. If he claims he isn't one, he's delusional.
But these things don't really work without trolls, so there's that.
chaz wrote:
If we are talking about recent history, the past year or so, then it's a Atomic hands down.
But you also have to account for style. Atomic trolls with absolutely no humility or sense of humor. These are qualities that can make a troll amusing and even likable.
atomic wrote:Yada wrote:fatskippy wrote:
Is there a douchebag of the year award?Julian, wrote:walkonby wrote:Thatguy could not stand me. He told me I could come back "over his dead body." I returned the day he died.
i thought he got banned before?
I'm not trying to be flippant or make fun of anyone's death. He really said that. I felt weird about it.
anusfront wins by a landslide.
I don't know you and sweetcell or stevewizzle ( i keep mixing those two up) could be good candidates. Really this is a board of trolls. Why are we handing out awards?
chaz wrote:Julian, wrote:chaz wrote:Uh, James Ford??
Atomic is the biggest troll on this board. It's a landslide. If he claims he isn't one, he's delusional.
But these things don't really work without trolls, so there's that.
I mean if you're talking about a cumulative body of work, going all the way back to Rhett, then probably. If we are talking about recent history, the past year or so, then it's a Atomic hands down.
But you also have to account for style. Atomic trolls with absolutely no humility or sense of humor. These are qualities that can make a troll amusing and even likable.
stevewizzle wrote:chaz wrote:Julian, wrote:chaz wrote:Uh, James Ford??
Atomic is the biggest troll on this board. It's a landslide. If he claims he isn't one, he's delusional.
But these things don't really work without trolls, so there's that.
I mean if you're talking about a cumulative body of work, going all the way back to Rhett, then probably. If we are talking about recent history, the past year or so, then it's a Atomic hands down.
But you also have to account for style. Atomic trolls with absolutely no humility or sense of humor. These are qualities that can make a troll amusing and even likable.
my absolute favorite atomic troll feature is the one where he "doesnt know" who anyone is, yet he's been posting 5+ times a day for the past two years.
i do admit, i've grown somewhat fond of him lately.
chaz wrote:[li]An obvious self-focus in interpersonal exchanges[/li]
[li]A lack of psychological awareness[/li]
[li]Difficulty with empathy[/li]
[li]Detesting those who do not admire them[/li]
[li]Pretending to be more important than they really are[/li]
[li]Bragging (subtly but persistently) and exaggerating their achievements[/li]
[li]Claiming to be an "expert" at many things[/li]
[li]Inability to view the world from the perspective of other people[/li]
[li]Denial of remorse and gratitude[/li]
[li] A sense of superiority places them above others[/li]
[li]Have inflated egos, inflated sense of entitlement, inflated sense of importance, inflated need to be center stage[/li]
chaz wrote:[li]An obvious self-focus in interpersonal exchanges[/li]
[li]A lack of psychological awareness[/li]
[li]Difficulty with empathy[/li]
[li]Detesting those who do not admire them[/li]
[li]Pretending to be more important than they really are[/li]
[li]Bragging (subtly but persistently) and exaggerating their achievements[/li]
[li]Claiming to be an "expert" at many things[/li]
[li]Inability to view the world from the perspective of other people[/li]
[li]Denial of remorse and gratitude[/li]
[li] A sense of superiority places them above others[/li]
[li]Have inflated egos, inflated sense of entitlement, inflated sense of importance, inflated need to be center stage[/li]
ggw wrote:Well played, sir!chaz wrote:[li]An obvious self-focus in interpersonal exchanges[/li]
[li]A lack of psychological awareness[/li]
[li]Difficulty with empathy[/li]
[li]Detesting those who do not admire them[/li]
[li]Pretending to be more important than they really are[/li]
[li]Bragging (subtly but persistently) and exaggerating their achievements[/li]
[li]Claiming to be an "expert" at many things[/li]
[li]Inability to view the world from the perspective of other people[/li]
[li]Denial of remorse and gratitude[/li]
[li] A sense of superiority places them above others[/li]
[li]Have inflated egos, inflated sense of entitlement, inflated sense of importance, inflated need to be center stage[/li]
Is this the criteria for the Boardie of the Year Award?
If so, Julian is a shoo-in.
Julian, wrote:
http://forum.930.com/index.php?topic=4841.75

Charlie wrote:
I understand the desire to keep things tasteful here.
kosmo wrote:im guessing I was gone for this? Details?
The forum vs Catholic University feud, where Vansmack was doing some detective work on who was posting.
Sidehatch wrote:Charlie wrote:
I understand the desire to keep things tasteful here.
Top 10 Posters Top 10 Boards
Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer 17766
vansmack 14402
markie 13178
ggw 12510
sweetcell 11863
azaghal1981 10544
kosmo vinyl 9417
Bags 8368
HoyaSaxa03 6966
Vas Deferens 6858
forum stats
So how does a person who hasn't been on the board since 2009 still have the #1 spot?
He's still averaging 4 posts a day?and hasn't posted in 4 years!