Sidehatch
Joined: October 04, 2011 at 04:33 AM UTC
Posts: 25687
Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
June 26, 2022 at 11:30 AM UTC
#
Space Freely
Joined: December 13, 2014 at 07:28 PM UTC
Posts: 11019
Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
June 27, 2022 at 03:10 PM UTC
#
“When we think about the United States, we make the essential error of imagining it as a single nation, a marbled mix of Red and Blue people,” Podhorzer writes. “But in truth, we have never been one nation. We are more like a federated republic of two nations: Blue Nation and Red Nation. This is not a metaphor; it is a geographic and historical reality.”
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2022/...l-podhorzer-newsletter/661377/…
It seems unlikely that the Trump-era Republicans installing the policy priorities of their preponderantly white and Christian coalition across the red states will be satisfied just setting the rules in the places now under their control. Podhorzer, like Mason and Grumbach, believes that the MAGA movement’s long-term goal is to tilt the electoral rules in enough states to make winning Congress or the White House almost impossible for Democrats. Then, with support from the GOP-appointed majority on the Supreme Court, Republicans could impose red-state values and programs nationwide, even if most Americans oppose them. The “MAGA movement is not stopping at the borders of the states it already controls,” Podhorzer writes. “It seeks to conquer as much territory as possible by any means possible.”
Starsky
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
June 27, 2022 at 03:45 PM UTC
#
If you had asked me a few years ago - say before the Merrick Garland debacle- if Roe v Wade would be overturned I would have said never. Until these wacky set of events starting with Scalia dying suddenly, Trump threading the needle, Kennedy retiring, RBG dying etc I just didn’t see it as possible. I mean of course I knew RBG could die but having these four events take place within four or five years seemed incredibly unlikely but here we are….
I think I and many Americans are in shock at this point and there is just a feeling of powerlessness and inevitability to all of it and it just feels like one is watching a horror movie.
Space Freely
Joined: December 13, 2014 at 07:28 PM UTC
Posts: 11019
Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
June 27, 2022 at 04:15 PM UTC
#
Starsky wrote:
If you had asked me a few years ago - say before the Merrick Garland debacle- if Roe v Wade would be overturned I would have said never. Until these wacky set of events starting with Scalia dying suddenly, Trump threading the needle, Kennedy retiring, RBG dying etc I just didn’t see it as possible. I mean of course I knew RBG could die but having these four events take place within four or five years seemed incredibly unlikely but here we are….
I think I and many Americans are in shock at this point and there is just a feeling of powerlessness and inevitability to all of it and it just feels like one is watching a horror movie.
Christians would say these minor miracles are all part of God's Plan.
Sidehatch
Joined: October 04, 2011 at 04:33 AM UTC
Posts: 25687
Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
June 27, 2022 at 04:20 PM UTC
#
Space wrote:“It seeks to conquer as much territory as possible by any means possible.”
I 100% believe that is true…they feel like that is what the Dems/liberals are doing to them now and Liberal tears bring them so much joy
Space wrote:
Christians would say these minor miracles are all part of God's Plan.
with this reasoning, why do they even need to vote, there is no free will
sweetcell
Joined: July 18, 2006 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 22608
Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
June 27, 2022 at 04:44 PM UTC
#
Starsky wrote:
I would argue the opposite
We desperately need to find a way to make less people vote.
reminder: we got rid of trump by getting more people to vote, overall.
Sidehatch
Joined: October 04, 2011 at 04:33 AM UTC
Posts: 25687
Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
June 27, 2022 at 05:27 PM UTC
#
sweetcell wrote:
Starsky wrote:
I would argue the opposite
We desperately need to find a way to make less people vote.
reminder: we got rid of trump by getting more people to vote, overall.
is it?
I thought we just rigged the election
grateful
Joined: October 15, 2008 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 11564
Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
June 27, 2022 at 05:35 PM UTC
#
Shhhh. You're not supposed to say it out loud.
kosmo
Joined: September 23, 1999 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 16329
Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
June 27, 2022 at 05:37 PM UTC
#
useless wrote:
sweetcell wrote:
Starsky wrote:
I would argue the opposite
We desperately need to find a way to make less people vote.
reminder: we got rid of trump by getting more people to vote, overall.
is it?
I thought we just rigged the election
don't be turning all QOP on us, by saying the quiet parts out loud ;)
Starsky
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
June 27, 2022 at 05:44 PM UTC
#
And one more thing: forcing people to vote does not sit well with me.
Talk about unconstitutional!!
Sidehatch
Joined: October 04, 2011 at 04:33 AM UTC
Posts: 25687
Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
June 27, 2022 at 05:45 PM UTC
#
Starsky wrote:No we didn’t
We won cause we got more people to vote in the right places. We happened to have more votes but that’s irrelevant
All the other shit he said was gibberish…but this nailed it 100%
and just barely got the right people in the right places…just barely
was not a mandate by any means. Popular vote means NOTHING
Starsky wrote:
And one more thing: forcing people to vote does not sit well with me.
I've never advocated this
I do think everyone who is eligible should just get a mailin ballot and then it's up to them
but shouldn't be forced
Starsky
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
June 27, 2022 at 05:47 PM UTC
#
Now I do agree everyone should be automatically registered to vote and voting times should be reasonable in and comparable within voting jurisdictions with national standards. But I think that’s a pipe dream.
Starsky
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
June 27, 2022 at 05:50 PM UTC
#
There is nothing I said that is gibberish.
Everyone should vote but if they did we would arguably swing more to the right. Just look at how well Trump did in the last election with all that he had going against him and how much he drove up turnout!
Take away covid or any number of other things and Trump is re-elected in a walk.
Is someone going to say wealthier more educated people tend to disproportionately vote D and the less educated poor who tend to disproportionately vote R somehow evened out D’s would stand a chance?
Of course Democrats have their own poor voting for them but it’s a much smaller set of voters.
Sidehatch
Joined: October 04, 2011 at 04:33 AM UTC
Posts: 25687
Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
June 27, 2022 at 05:53 PM UTC
#
Starsky wrote:
Take away covid or any number of other things and Trump is re-elected in a walk.
take away about 40k people in 3 states and it was trump
the guy got 11million more people to show up the second time around
I think without him on the ballot, lots of them wouldn't show up
Starsky
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
June 27, 2022 at 05:56 PM UTC
#
Right but you want to make it easier for those people to vote!
jrpa
Joined: September 03, 2013 at 03:15 PM UTC
Posts: 29999
Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
June 27, 2022 at 06:01 PM UTC
#
Starsky wrote:
Everyone should vote but if they did we would arguably swing more to the right.
No one thinks this but you. The Democrats think if 100% of eligible voters, vote, it helps Dems. You see this from their efforts to make it easier to vote.
The Republicans think if 100% of eligible voters, vote, it helps Dems. You see this from their efforts to make voting as restrictive as possible.
The Democrats think if the eligible voter pool increases nationwide (felons getting their voting rights back, just rank-and-file unregistered voters sign up holistically) it helps Dems. You see this in their efforts to increase the voter pool.
The Republicans think if the eligible voter pool increases nationwide (felons getting their voting rights back, just rank-and-file unregistered voters sign up holistically) it helps Dems. You see this in their opposition to things like automatic voter registration and automatic restoration of voting rights.
You *may* be correct, but I'm always stunned how being alone on an island on these things never seems to make you reconsider your beliefs. There's a word for people who insist they're right despite every single person telling them they're wrong.
Starsky
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
June 27, 2022 at 06:05 PM UTC
#
A contrarían?
That’s right…I am the Salmon
There is nothing worse to me than “conventional wisdom” or just regurgitating what everyone says
The key for Democrats is to make it easier for their supporters to vote without doing so for their opponents. Seems basic but of course it’s unpalatable to say it so we hear and regurgitate all this baloney.
jrpa
Joined: September 03, 2013 at 03:15 PM UTC
Posts: 29999
Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
June 27, 2022 at 06:14 PM UTC
#
Starsky wrote:
The key for Democrats is to make it easier for their supporters to vote without doing so for their opponents.
Of course. If every Republican in the country got a flat tire on voting day, that would be super great for Dems, but that isn't what we're talking about.
You're conflating "one side getting the vote out" [in your hypothetical, the GOP] with "everyone voting" which is not the same thing. If we split into 2 alternate universes that are absolutely identical with the exception that one universe has the voting turnout and rules we have now and the second universe has literally every adult over 18 was allowed to vote, automatically registered, and we had 100% turnout, how do you see universe #2's results compared to universe #1's? If you think it helps the GOP, can you explain why?
Starsky
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Official 930 Supreme Court thread
June 27, 2022 at 06:17 PM UTC
#
I really got to skit but one last thing
Democrats talk so much about people voting…like they won’t shut up about it
But go to most big urban areas and voting is hell. Outdated machines and huge lines election after election. Democrats expect people to wait in line for five hours sometimes in the freezing cold or rain. We see this time and time again in places like Miami, Philly, Atlanta, Detroit! Coincidentally most of these places have been run my Democrats for 50 years?
If we really care about voting like you all say we do couldn’t we at least make it somewhat easier for our natural voting constituencies to vote? Can’t we at least start with that?
But nobody cares or does anything. And we continue with this Pollyanna bull about how we want everyone to vote
Gotta run