Client 9 expected to resign

I wouldn't go as far as saying 'no money' - $1,000 per hour whores just aren't in the budget!
And yeah, I would totally pay that whore for sex!
Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:
I don't think he would be interested in a mistress. It's prostitution that he's into, not adultery. Which makes his ten times the douchebag.
interesting - engaging in prostitution is ten times worse than adultery? (putting aside the fact that a married person engaging in prostitution is also committing adultery…)

i think that adultery (keeping a mistress) is worse - more of a relationship, most probably more emotion, and it's longer-term… seeing a hooker is a short-term physical thing.

only way that prostitution seems worse to me is the STD factor… and professionals make their their clients wear protection.
I agree wholeheartedly with sweetcell….sex is dirty nasty and makes you go to hell.

Now, I'm off to my Promise Keepers meeting, see you there sweetie!!
Originally posted by 47 YEAR OLD VIRGIN:
I agree wholeheartedly with sweetcell….sex is dirty nasty and makes you go to hell.
absolutely not. sex is awesome, mind-expanding, and the greatest thing you can do with another person (as long as it's consentual). sex can be dirty but only when you're lucky ;) in my books, sex is encouraged and will be until the day i become a parent (should be interesting, since i'm against abstinence education… for now).

marrying someone - making a life-long promise to them - then stepping out and having sex with someone else, now that's nasty. then again i'm not married, so i'm speaking for a group that i'm not a member of.
Marriage is kind of a bogus concept too, in my view, but that's a whole other discussion…
Originally posted by They call me Doctor Doom.:
Marriage is kind of a bogus concept too, in my view, but that's a whole other discussion…
Yeah! Damn those fundamental building blocks of humanity society!
Originally posted by sweetcell:
so i'm speaking for a group that i'm not a member of.
…for only the millionth time. Actually, that should be your motto: "I'm speaking for a group that i'm not a member of."

Brian
I was looking at it from the point that he's disrespecting women in general (half his constituency) by paying for sex with a woman. I was simply looking at it from the perspective that he's a public figure, not from the persepctive that he's a husband.

In terms of disrespecting his wife, sure, an adulterous affair of an ongoing nature is worse than a one time anonymous thing (discounting the STD factore, which you can't).


Originally posted by sweetcell:
Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:
I don't think he would be interested in a mistress. It's prostitution that he's into, not adultery. Which makes his ten times the douchebag.
interesting - engaging in prostitution is ten times worse than adultery? (putting aside the fact that a married person engaging in prostitution is also committing adultery…)

i think that adultery (keeping a mistress) is worse - more of a relationship, most probably more emotion, and it's longer-term… seeing a hooker is a short-term physical thing.

only way that prostitution seems worse to me is the STD factor… and professionals make their their clients wear protection.
Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:
I was looking at it from the point that he's disrespecting women in general (half his constituency) by paying for sex with a woman. I was simply looking at it from the perspective that he's a public figure, not from the persepctive that he's a husband.

In terms of disrespecting his wife, sure, an adulterous affair of an ongoing nature is worse than a one time anonymous thing (discounting the STD factore, which you can't).
ah, makes sense. agreed.

Originally posted by Brian Wallace:
…for only the millionth time. Actually, that should be your motto: "I'm speaking for a group that i'm not a member of."

Brian
request denied: too little basis in the truth. 99% of the time, i speak for a group that i do belong to: "me". yes, we are legion.

not being a member of group doesn't mean one can't have an opinion about it.

and this, from the person who claims to speak "for the younger generation". sheesh. wait… aren't you, like, not young yourself?