thirsty moore
Joined: January 11, 2000 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 6131
Greenpeace
June 19, 2003 at 03:23 PM UTC
#
I'm no animal rights activist, but this shows absolutely no respect to those porpoises. What the hell is Greenpeace thinking?
Dead Porpoises Disrupt Berlin Whaling Meeting
BERLIN (Reuters) - Greenpeace activists stretchered three dead porpoises to the site of the International Whaling Commission Thursday, disrupting the meeting to highlight the threats marine mammals face.
The three harbor porpoises had been ensnared and drowned by fishing nets in the Baltic Sea. The activists urged the world whaling organization to tackle the problem of so-called bycatch, which environmentalists say kills 300,000 whales, dolphins and porpoises a year.
Activists bearing the porpoises, about 1-1/2 meters (3 ft 3 in) long, marched on to the grounds of the hotel where the IWC meeting was taking place.
The demonstration was timed to coincide with a coffee break in the meeting. Some delegates booed when they saw the dead porpoises.
This week's annual meeting has exposed the deep splits in the IWC between pro-whaling nations, led by Japan and Norway, which are keen to allow limited whale catches, and those such as the United States and many European states pushing to give greater protection to the planet's biggest mammals.
Anti-whalers succeeded Monday in backing a measure to set up a conservation committee, a sharp shift for the 57-year-old Commission hailed by environmentalists.
da'niceguys
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Greenpeace
June 19, 2003 at 04:02 PM UTC
#
thats a horrible thing to happen. but i don't fully agree with you on it. Yes it is disrespectful to the propoises but it has to be less disrespectfull, then the way in which they were killed. It would seem that the animals were already dead and that if dragging the carcas (?spelling?) to make some sort of statement about it in hopes of stopping it, seems to be for the good and respect of the species instead of bad and disrespect to the dead animal.
Guiny
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Greenpeace
June 19, 2003 at 06:05 PM UTC
#
There's a few Greenpeace twats in yellow shirts near Farrogot (sp) West looking for new members if people feel like slapping the shit out of someone. I did. :cool:
G.Love
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Greenpeace
June 19, 2003 at 07:37 PM UTC
#
So serioulsy,
Do animals go to heaven/hell, like humans?
What does the bible say?
Tha answer to this will ease my mind about this popoise situation.
and why not call them dolphins?
Rhett Miller
Joined: November 15, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 17762
Re: Greenpeace
June 19, 2003 at 07:41 PM UTC
#
Porpoises go to heaven, just like most good people. Only Republicans go to hell.
redsock
Joined: February 20, 2002 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1893
Re: Greenpeace
June 19, 2003 at 07:44 PM UTC
#
I think the true catholic, ergo christian, definition, is that animals do not have souls, thus, they do not go to ehaven. Always found that hard to beleive though.
markie
Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 13178
Re: Greenpeace
June 19, 2003 at 07:55 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by redsock:
I think the true catholic, ergo christian, definition, is that animals do not have souls, thus, they do not go to ehaven. Always found that hard to beleive though.
You find it easy to believe people go to heaven though? So all 6 billion of us on the planet when we die will be in heaven, what do you think we will all be doing?
Rhett Miller
Joined: November 15, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 17762
Re: Greenpeace
June 19, 2003 at 07:57 PM UTC
#
Probably the same thing they do in discos in the South of France.
listening to bad Eurotrash music.
Originally posted by Andrew WK:
Originally posted by redsock:
I think the true catholic, ergo christian, definition, is that animals do not have souls, thus, they do not go to ehaven. Always found that hard to beleive though.
You find it easy to believe people go to heaven though? So all 6 billion of us on the planet when we die will be in heaven, what do you think we will all be doing?
markie
Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 13178
Re: Greenpeace
June 19, 2003 at 07:58 PM UTC
#
So heaven is a gay nightclub?
Samantha
Joined: August 30, 2002 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1438
Re: Greenpeace
June 19, 2003 at 08:00 PM UTC
#
oh boohoo poor whales and dolphins…what about the fish they're TRYING to catch? even more of them die….sheesh!
redsock
Joined: February 20, 2002 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1893
Re: Greenpeace
June 19, 2003 at 08:01 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by Andrew WK:
So heaven is a gay nightclub?
Apparently it is for Rhett. I think heaven could be a bowling alley if you want it to be. Being neither a catholic, nor a chrisitian with any sense of the after-life, for all i know heaven is infinite darkness. Better than a gay nightclub.
Rhett Miller
Joined: November 15, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 17762
Re: Greenpeace
June 19, 2003 at 08:05 PM UTC
#
I was not referring to a gay nightclub. I was referring to places where fat pale middle age British swingers go to get it on.
Now that's heaven…not.
Originally posted by redsock:
Originally posted by Andrew WK:
So heaven is a gay nightclub?
Apparently it is for Rhett. I think heaven could be a bowling alley if you want it to be. Being neither a catholic, nor a chrisitian with any sense of the after-life, for all i know heaven is infinite darkness. Better than a gay nightclub.
Venerable Bede
Joined: October 16, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 3863
Re: Greenpeace
June 19, 2003 at 08:06 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by redsock:
I think the true catholic, ergo christian, definition, is that animals do not have souls, thus, they do not go to ehaven. Always found that hard to beleive though.
not necessarily true. . st. augustine argued that animals did have souls. . however, descartes disagreed. augustine argued that since humans have similar characteristics as humans, animals must also possess a soul. the difference between humans and animals only being the ability for humans to be self-conscious and have free choice. furthermore, he argued that people are morally responsible in the way one treats an animal and act humanely.
however, descartes argued that animals could not think or act like humans (real), but are more like clocks and clockwork (unreal); ergo, could not have a soul. since we are still stuck in a cartesian system, this has obviously been the prevalent mode of thought since.
mankie
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Greenpeace
June 19, 2003 at 08:10 PM UTC
#
Has nobody seen the movie "all dogs go to heaven" for crying out loud! ;)
Rhett Miller
Joined: November 15, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 17762
Re: Greenpeace
June 19, 2003 at 08:11 PM UTC
#
Yes, but what would Descartes say about DBT? Great rock band, or bloated rednecks?
Originally posted by Venerable Bede:
Originally posted by redsock:
I think the true catholic, ergo christian, definition, is that animals do not have souls, thus, they do not go to ehaven. Always found that hard to beleive though.
not necessarily true. . st. augustine argued that animals did have souls. . however, descartes disagreed. augustine argued that since humans have similar characteristics as humans, animals must also possess a soul. the difference between humans and animals only being the ability for humans to be self-conscious and have free choice. furthermore, he argued that people are morally responsible in the way one treats an animal and act humanely.
however, descartes argued that animals could not think or act like humans (real), but are more like clocks and clockwork (unreal); ergo, could not have a soul. since we are still stuck in a cartesian system, this has obviously been the prevalent mode of thought since.
markie
Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 13178
Re: Greenpeace
June 19, 2003 at 08:12 PM UTC
#
Bede,
Your sum that up nicely. I did always think it would really suck to eat an animal that had a soul. I mean imagine the embarassment in heaven if you walked by daisy the cow and she mooed "you ate me, 2 burgers and a pair of shoes".
Rhett, sorry about the cheap jibe, you left yourself wide open…..
I dont understand how and why anyone could believe in heaven and hell. The plot of Matrix2 is more feasible to me.
G.Love
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Greenpeace
June 19, 2003 at 08:13 PM UTC
#
Wow VB,
That is some heavy stuff. So what about animals coveting their neighbors wife and killing?
isn't there some Catholic saint that on his saint day you can take your pet to church and have it blessed?
Rhett Miller
Joined: November 15, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 17762
Re: Greenpeace
June 19, 2003 at 08:16 PM UTC
#
I would have had an easier time believing in heaven and hell than if you had told me two airplanes were going to take out both of the World Trade Center buildings…