To Jaguar's credit, she didn't compare Poorlulu's looks to Ms. Lewinsky's. You did, Markie.
Velvet Lounge set times?
Originally posted by Robert Pollard:have you ever thought about what makes you enjoy it?
Here you go Markie - when I listen to Nada Surf, I enjoy it, is it justified now
Originally posted by thirsty moore:no I really dont think so. She alluded to three people from the board being the three people in the photograph, yes?
To Jaguar's credit, she didn't compare Poorlulu's looks to Ms. Lewinsky's. You did, Markie.
One male, two women, yes?
Jaguar said she didnt have the drink the big smile and the glasses, yes?
Therefore what is the conclusion?
is that simple enough a recap?
Alright, so it'll be a Pollard-Jaguar-Thirsty tagteam match against The Mad Scientist.
Sweet….
Sweet….
well if bland pop if what you seek i can probably rustle up some…
based on the 30 second sound bytes on the nadasurf website, i heard loads of variety with a bit of spot the influence. i.e. elliot smith and the church. not bad and i can see why bob would enjoy listening to it.
based on the 30 second sound bytes on the nadasurf website, i heard loads of variety with a bit of spot the influence. i.e. elliot smith and the church. not bad and i can see why bob would enjoy listening to it.
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:argghhghg, I'll take them all on, grrrrrrrrrrr
Alright, so it'll be a Pollard-Jaguar-Thirsty tagteam match against The Mad Scientist.
Sweet….
whose corner are you going to be in GGW?
Jesus Markie, get over it! :roll:
If everyone reacted like you are now to some very innocent playing around with pictures posted here than you would have no friends on this board. Period! Many a time you have posted pictures that were much, much worse of others and alluded or even directly claimed that they were that person, thing or animal. Again, you can dish it out but you can't take it. I saw a picture that reminded me of the recent party and selected 3 people that it could remind me of. Thirsty looked a little like Thurston but the person, in his case, did have something to do with it. The other 2 were only 2 other people at the party, within our group whom I selected based only on the very slightest resemblances, and only visual ones. Even then, I selected based on my closer connections. The women themselves had absofuckinglutely nothing whatsoever to do with the selections.
Markie, go home and get laid or beat off or something. You are too tense this week.
If everyone reacted like you are now to some very innocent playing around with pictures posted here than you would have no friends on this board. Period! Many a time you have posted pictures that were much, much worse of others and alluded or even directly claimed that they were that person, thing or animal. Again, you can dish it out but you can't take it. I saw a picture that reminded me of the recent party and selected 3 people that it could remind me of. Thirsty looked a little like Thurston but the person, in his case, did have something to do with it. The other 2 were only 2 other people at the party, within our group whom I selected based only on the very slightest resemblances, and only visual ones. Even then, I selected based on my closer connections. The women themselves had absofuckinglutely nothing whatsoever to do with the selections.
Markie, go home and get laid or beat off or something. You are too tense this week.
Originally posted by markie:I'll be handling the promotion $$
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:argghhghg, I'll take them all on, grrrrrrrrrrr
Alright, so it'll be a Pollard-Jaguar-Thirsty tagteam match against The Mad Scientist.
Sweet….
whose corner are you going to be in GGW?
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:I trust that you will promote this bash and maximize the profits. ;)
Alright, so it'll be a Pollard-Jaguar-Thirsty tagteam match against The Mad Scientist.
Sweet….
Oh, and I think that Kosmo wants in on this fiasco.
She did allude to three people on the board being the three people in the photograph. One of them being Thurston Moore, and the other two being Monica Lewinsky and Kim Gordon.
The only thing in common that any of us three have with that picture is that I use Thurston Moore's name on the board. Jaguar never said that any of us looked like anyone in the picture. It was name association only.
The only thing in common that any of us three have with that picture is that I use Thurston Moore's name on the board. Jaguar never said that any of us looked like anyone in the picture. It was name association only.
Originally posted by Jaguär:No I am fine, really. Oh, and your quote sounds like contradiction.
Jesus Markie, get over it! :roll:
The other 2 were only 2 other people at the party, within our group whom I selected based only on the very slightest resemblances, and only visual ones. Even then, I selected based on my closer connections. The women themselves had absofuckinglutely nothing whatsoever to do with the selections.
Originally posted by Jaguär:only if i can dj… or say "LETS GET READY TO RUMBLE" the mic that drops down from the rafters is way deck….
Originally posted by ggw™:I trust that you will promote this bash and maximize the profits. ;)
Alright, so it'll be a Pollard-Jaguar-Thirsty tagteam match against The Mad Scientist.
Sweet….
Oh, and I think that Kosmo wants in on this fiasco.
So constantly bringing up something equals fine? I'd hate to hear you gripe about an injury.
Originally posted by thirsty moore:Only one person was name association.
She did allude to THREE people on the board being the three people in the photograph.
It was name association only.
Originally posted by markie:Oh, and your quote sounds like contradiction.
In your mind only. :roll:
Originally posted by thirsty moore:yes really, I am fine. I brought it up because Jag implied that Lulu and her were going to gang up against me.
So constantly bringing up something equals fine? I'd hate to hear you gripe about an injury.
I wouldnt have bothered if I knew it would all start again.
I had hoped that someone would have apologised for making that association. Am I not allowed to defend Lulu? Who took the comments the same way I did, as did another person from here.
But as Fico says, its just arguing on the internet
Originally posted by Jaguär:really,
Originally posted by markie:Oh, and your quote sounds like contradiction.
In your mind only. :roll:
you say to paraphrase:
slight visual resemblences,
then the women chosen had nothing to do with it whatsoever.
Which? That is contradiction.
I am doing this now out of arguemnets sake.
Originally posted by markie:
Originally posted by thirsty moore:yes really, I am fine. I brought it up because Jag implied that Lulu and her were going to gang up against me.
So constantly bringing up something equals fine? I'd hate to hear you gripe about an injury.
Read what I wrote!:
"Possibly, but there is one little thing missing. Poorlulu. All along it's been Markie trying to get his woman to to do his fighting for him. Hell, Poorlulu and I will just get together and have fun and let Markie stew it out with Pollard or whomever else he feels like picking on at the moment."
Where in there do you get the idea that Lulu and I would "gang up against(you)"?
My implication is that we wouldn't even bother. :roll:
I wouldnt have bothered if I knew it would all start again.
Somehow I doubt that. I'm sure that you've been dying to start it all over again.
I had hoped that someone would have apologised for making that association. Am I not allowed to defend Lulu? Who took the comments the same way I did, as did another person from here.
I'm sorry that you are upset but I don't think that I did anything wrong. Nothing but the same games we play on here everyday. It was you who read much, much more into that post than was ever intended and I have no doubt that just about everyone else knew how little it meant. It was 3 people enjoying a party, and that's about all it was.
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:[/qb]I'll be handling the promotion $$ [/QB]
Watch out. It looks like Markie's been practicing:
http://rope.92kqrs.com/waxy/Star_Wars_Kid.wmv
The earning potential from this venture must be almost unlimitless.