Originally posted by pollard:hahahahha
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:The success of that movie will kill me. Killer!
Yes.
gay marriage
Originally posted by Harriet Balls:Your case being what?
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:I rest my case.
Originally posted by Harriet Balls:Yes.
if someone broke into your home and threatened the lives of you and/or your family and you were able to kill them, would you?
That one will choose to be bisexual if someone breaks into one's house and threatens one's life or the lives of one's family?
Do you let your girlfriend/wife stick her finger up your ass?
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:trick question, i know.
Originally posted by god's shoeshine:You mean Kerry, Edwards, or Bush?
do you plan to vote for a proiraqi-war candidate?
Yes.
logic spirals rule
Originally posted by Harriet Balls:I thought everyone was gay…Curt Cobain said so and he's a modern day prophet evidently.
Originally posted by mankie:he's bi, mankie, just like everybody
Rhett's gay and he's been married for a while now.
:roll:
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:The TRANSLATION technique without a doubt.
Originally posted by sonickteam2:Which do you hate more, the "stupid question" technique, or the "TRANSLATION:" technique?
your snotty "arguing" techinques of asking stupid questions like that really gets on my nerves.
Originally posted by Rutherford J. Balls:with or without lube?
Do you let your girlfriend/wife stick her finger up your ass?
Originally posted by Rutherford J. Balls:<img src="http://www.goofyphotos.com/fun/stinky.jpg" alt=" - " />
Do you let your girlfriend/wife stick her finger up your ass?
pooooooooo…………
Originally posted by Harriet Balls:Seriously, what's your case?
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:I rest my case.
Originally posted by Harriet Balls:Yes.
if someone broke into your home and threatened the lives of you and/or your family and you were able to kill them, would you?
You have shown that in an extreme situation I would kill to protect myself or my family.
Are you arguing that I am therefore a "killer" merely because of this potentiality?
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:sorry for the delay…I was actually doing some work…or, talking about it…anyway…basically, yes…yes, it's too harsh a stroke for the argument of all people having the potential for bisexuality, but I just think a human being can basically be socialized to do or be almost anything and that sexuality/gender roles are very strongly part of our socialization…
Originally posted by Harriet Balls:Seriously, what's your case?
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:I rest my case.
Originally posted by Harriet Balls:Yes.
if someone broke into your home and threatened the lives of you and/or your family and you were able to kill them, would you?
You have shown that in an extreme situation I would kill to protect myself or my family.
Are you arguing that I am therefore a "killer" merely because of this potentiality?
Maybe she is arguing that if someone were trying to shove a gun up your ass, you'd probably give in and go bi.
Originally posted by Harriet Balls:So what you're saying is homosexuality IS a choice then? Weakens the gay marraige argument if you ask me…if you want to marry you should change your choice back to being straight.
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:sorry for the delay…I was actually doing some work…or, talking about it…anyway…basically, yes…yes, it's too harsh a stroke for the argument of all people having the potential for bisexuality, but I just think a human being can basically be socialized to do or be almost anything and that sexuality/gender roles are very strongly part of our socialization…
Originally posted by Harriet Balls:Seriously, what's your case?
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:I rest my case.
Originally posted by Harriet Balls:Yes.
if someone broke into your home and threatened the lives of you and/or your family and you were able to kill them, would you?
You have shown that in an extreme situation I would kill to protect myself or my family.
Are you arguing that I am therefore a "killer" merely because of this potentiality?
Right?
Originally posted by mankie:I won't say whether it's a choice or not. I really can't since I'm not homosexual. I, personally, can't understand NOT being able to NOT want to have sex with someone of my same gender. I can take or leave chicks.
So what you're saying is homosexuality IS a choice then? Weakens the gay marraige argument if you ask me…if you want to marry you should change your choice back to being straight.
Right? [/QB]
This, however, has no bearing on whether they should be able to get married. Whether they choose to be with someone of the same sex or not, all it is is a commitment to share a life with another individual for as long as you both live. That's it.
Originally posted by Harriet Balls:Marriage is traditionally a commitment between a man and a woman. I had sympathy for gays on this issue if they were born that way, but if they can be "socialized", as you say, to be straight, then fuck em…want to get wed, go straight.
Originally posted by mankie:I won't say whether it's a choice or not. I really can't since I'm not homosexual. I, personally, can't understand NOT being able to NOT want to have sex with someone of my same gender. I can take or leave chicks.
So what you're saying is homosexuality IS a choice then? Weakens the gay marraige argument if you ask me…if you want to marry you should change your choice back to being straight.
Right?
This, however, has no bearing on whether they should be able to get married. Whether they choose to be with someone of the same sex or not, all it is is a commitment to share a life with another individual for as long as you both live. That's it. [/QB]
I think you're wrong though, because personally, there's no way I'm touching another blokes knob, no way, no how.
Can't+NOT+NOT
You lost me with that sentence!
Right? [/QB]I won't say whether it's a choice or not. I really can't since I'm not homosexual. I, personally, can't understand NOT being able to NOT want to have sex with someone of my same gender. I can take or leave chicks.
[/QB]
You lost me with that sentence!
Right? [/QB]I won't say whether it's a choice or not. I really can't since I'm not homosexual. I, personally, can't understand NOT being able to NOT want to have sex with someone of my same gender. I can take or leave chicks.
[/QB]
Originally posted by Rutherford J. Balls:It means I can't relate to a desire for someone of my own sex that is so strong I couldn't chose not to go for it. It means that if a girl was cute enough and the circumstances were right, I might go for it, but I am not compelled to…whereas I understand some homosexuals tend to describe their situation as being very strongly drawn to their own sex to the point that they would be in denial if they did not go for it. I'm saying that since I'm not gay I can't really say if it's a choice for them or not. I can only speak of what I think about bisexuality.
Can't+NOT+NOT
You lost me with that sentence!
Right?
Originally posted by Harriet Balls:I think women have a stronger tendency to be bisexual…men are more black and white on the issue, for the most part.
Originally posted by Rutherford J. Balls:It means I can't relate to a desire for someone of my own sex that is so strong I couldn't chose not to go for it. It means that if a girl was cute enough and the circumstances were right, I might go for it, but I am not compelled to…whereas I understand some homosexuals tend to describe their situation as being very strongly drawn to their own sex to the point that they would be in denial if they did not go for it. I'm saying that since I'm not gay I can't really say if it's a choice for them or not. I can only speak of what I think about bisexuality.
Can't+NOT+NOT
You lost me with that sentence!
Right?
Originally posted by mankie:hello!
I think women have a stronger tendency to be bisexual…men are more black and white on the issue, for the most part.
that's because of the socialization…in our culture, it's OK for women to be touchy-feely with people…including other women…women are "pretty"…women are objectified much more in media for both men and women…that is why…it's nothing inherent…in ancient Greece, most of the scholars were bi, weren't they? they procreated with the women, but they had sex with other men for pleasure and camraderie…it's totally cultural
Originally posted by Harriet Balls:Err, they were Greek..what's your point?
Originally posted by mankie:hello!
I think women have a stronger tendency to be bisexual…men are more black and white on the issue, for the most part.
that's because of the socialization…in our culture, it's OK for women to be touchy-feely with people…including other women…women are "pretty"…women are objectified much more in media for both men and women…that is why…it's nothing inherent…in ancient Greece, most of the scholars were bi, weren't they? they procreated with the women, but they had sex with other men for pleasure and camraderie…it's totally cultural
It has nothing to do with socialization, it has everything to do with emotional make up of the sexes…why is it little girls immediately start to play with baby dolls and boys with trucks before there's been a chance to "socialize" them as you say?
Originally posted by mankie:what does playing with dolls or trucks have to do with emotional makeup or sexuality…plenty of gay or bi guys are just as "masculine" on the outside…and I chose mainly stuffed animals when I was a kid…what does that make me, I wonder? a "Furry"? I do like my men hairy
It has nothing to do with socialization, it has everything to do with emotional make up of the sexes…why is it little girls immediately start to play with baby dolls and boys with trucks before there's been a chance to "socialize" them as you say?