930 Forums

Stone Roses reunion rumors surface again

lwoxley
Joined: October 06, 2004 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4792
Re: Stone Roses reunion rumors surface again April 07, 2011 at 06:07 PM UTC #
If it was an American tabloid wolfboy would be joining them on tour.  ;D

The Sun was actually correct in their story, Mani put the kaibosh (sp?) on it.

hmmmmm. maybe wolfboy can take Mani's place?
hutch
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Stone Roses reunion rumors surface again April 07, 2011 at 06:15 PM UTC #
Frank wrote:
If it was an American tabloid wolfboy would be joining them on tour.  ;D

The Sun was actually correct in their story, Mani put the kaibosh (sp?) on it.

hmmmmm. maybe wolfboy can take Mani's place?



Gallagher, pardon me for being blunt but as usual you are full of shit.

The sun story read:

THE STONE ROSES are getting back together after IAN BROWN and JOHN SQUIRE buried the hatchet on one of the most bitter feuds in rock 'n' roll history.

The former best pals hadn't spoken for the best part of 15 years after falling out in a war of words when the band imploded back in 1996.

But, last month the pair established contact again and a megabucks reunion is now being lined up to happen later in the year.

————-


How the fuck was that correct?


Oh, nevermind dude, keep on making shit up.
Relaxer
Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5410
Re: Stone Roses reunion rumors surface again April 07, 2011 at 07:05 PM UTC #
Mani is a great bassist and a major part of what made the Roses great, but they could easily pull off a reunion without him. All they need is Ian and John, even Renni is optional (though his absence would cause more consternation than Mani's).
lwoxley
Joined: October 06, 2004 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4792
Re: Stone Roses reunion rumors surface again April 07, 2011 at 07:09 PM UTC #
Relaxer wrote:
Mani is a great bassist and a major part of what made the Roses great, but they could easily pull off a reunion without him. All they need is Ian and John, even Renni is optional (though his absence would cause more consternation than Mani's).


BINGO!!!!!!

Ian Brown controls the reunion….they don't need Mani, bass players are ten a penny.
No Ian Brown - no Stone Roses
No Mani - Whatever…..
hutch
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Stone Roses reunion rumors surface again April 07, 2011 at 07:13 PM UTC #
actually, my friend who was with me at the stone roses show at WUST (before it became 930) was convinced mani messed up the bass line to his favorite song… he was real bummed about it and i don't think he was wrong cause he knew his stone roses stuff…


i hardly recall anything bout that show (pre digital camera etc.)… i know it started EARLY and we missed a few songs..
Mobius
Joined: March 28, 2002 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1371
Re: Stone Roses reunion rumors surface again April 07, 2011 at 09:30 PM UTC #
Relaxer wrote:
Mani is a great bassist and a major part of what made the Roses great, but they could easily pull off a reunion without him. All they need is Ian and John, even Renni is optional (though his absence would cause more consternation than Mani's).


Is this a joke?
Relaxer
Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5410
Re: Stone Roses reunion rumors surface again April 07, 2011 at 09:31 PM UTC #
Yeah, ha ha

HA HA HA
Brian_Walalce
Joined: May 16, 2005 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1484
Re: Stone Roses reunion rumors surface again April 07, 2011 at 11:26 PM UTC #

Didn't they have their own version of Bez?  A guy who didn't play an instrument but was there for "vibes?"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPdUKy7_aqM

Brian
hutch
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Stone Roses reunion rumors surface again October 18, 2011 at 01:44 PM UTC #
stone roses reforming
hutch
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Stone Roses reunion rumors surface again October 18, 2011 at 01:50 PM UTC #
"We are going to rule the world again. It's happening."
                                                              Ian Brown
kosmo
Joined: September 23, 1999 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 16329
Re: Stone Roses reunion rumors surface again October 18, 2011 at 01:59 PM UTC #
Is this the filthy lucre because the bitch bled me dry tour?

the bigger issue will if ian and co. and can tour the us or not…
hutch
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Stone Roses reunion rumors surface again October 18, 2011 at 02:13 PM UTC #
its always about the benjamins… in any case according to NME at the press conference:

So it's official: there will be two shows at Manchester's Heaton Park on June 29th and 30th, followed by a world tour. And the best bit? The Stone Roses will be playing NEW SONGS!
James Ford
Joined: July 22, 2009 at 09:02 PM UTC
Posts: 5620
Re: Stone Roses reunion rumors surface again October 18, 2011 at 02:19 PM UTC #
I don't actually think I know anybody who is a Stones Roses fan, but I always imagine their fans must be pretty douchey themselves to put up with this band of douchebags. Am I totally wrong? Or am I confusing them with Oasis?
bunnyman
Joined: November 19, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5542
Re: Stone Roses reunion rumors surface again October 18, 2011 at 02:39 PM UTC #
Douchey? I'm a Roses fan. I'm as fresh as a daisy, but no douche use here. But thanks very much for caring enough to ask.
kosmo
Joined: September 23, 1999 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 16329
Re: Stone Roses reunion rumors surface again October 18, 2011 at 02:41 PM UTC #
i'm a stone roses fan, if douche means owning several versions of their first album, then so be it…
lwoxley
Joined: October 06, 2004 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4792
Re: Stone Roses reunion rumors surface again October 18, 2011 at 02:45 PM UTC #
Another Roses fan who's also fresh as a summers eve.

Not sure I need them to reunite though….could be a complete train wreck, and ruin the whole 'Roses thing' for me. Besides, Stone Roses are Ian Brown and some musicians. Ian Browns 'solo' stuff is just as good.
Brian_Walalce
Joined: May 16, 2005 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1484
Re: Stone Roses reunion rumors surface again October 18, 2011 at 02:49 PM UTC #

I'm looking forward to this SO much!  It could be the most hilariously awful thing ever!  A band with ONE good album that sounds more dated and overrated with every passing second?  A "singer" who REALLY can't sing?  Comically dated fashion ("Reni bucket hat!")  20+ years of swearing they'd NEVER reform the original line-up?  I'm just looking forward to how Ian Brown can deny it's not about the money.  I never thought in my lifetime I'd see a more pathetic reunion, but I was wrong Sex Pistols.  I was WRONG!

Brian
kosmo
Joined: September 23, 1999 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 16329
Re: Stone Roses reunion rumors surface again October 18, 2011 at 02:51 PM UTC #
well for me their john squire, a crack rhythm section and a brilliant producer who managed to capture a mediocre singer in tune once in awhile :) 
Papa_Wallace
Joined: October 06, 2011 at 06:39 PM UTC
Posts: 17
Re: Stone Roses reunion rumors surface again October 18, 2011 at 02:55 PM UTC #
Brian_Wallace wrote:

I'm looking forward to this SO much!  It could be the most hilariously awful thing ever!  A band with ONE good album that sounds more dated and overrated with every passing second?   A "singer" who REALLY can't sing?  Comically dated fashion ("Reni bucket hat!")  20+ years of swearing they'd NEVER reform the original line-up?  I'm just looking forward to how Ian Brown can deny it's not about the money.  I never thought in my lifetime I'd see a more pathetic reunion, but I was wrong Sex Pistols.  I was WRONG!

Brian


Sorry kids. I tried to catch Mr. Fussy Pants before he could post. Somebody is going to be mowing my lawn when he comes by the house. If he keeps it up I'll be heading right back to Hot Topic to return his birthday presents.

Papa
← Back to board