ITT, we shallowly objectify other people by discussing their appearance.

I wrote:
Sooooooo, Rachel C00k?

She seems like your standard, empty eyed model. 7/10. Would throw the bone if need be.
Some of the photos on her instagram looks like Fiona Apple's head (circa 1996) has been photoshopped on an otherwise attractive woman. Docking a point or two for that.
Annie Yu?
Dakota Johnson?
Sue Palka?

Helen Mirren?

Charlotte Rampling?
Can everybody just post photos of themselves and their significant others? And then we'll let the judging begin.
walk,on,by wrote:
Can everybody just post photos of themselves and their significant others? And then we'll let the judging begin.

you first? ;D
ok I'll start

^always wearing turtlenecks…
*insert pussy joke here*
This is me, dudes:



Feel free to objectify me.
I wrote:

The chick is a solid 7.5. Would go as high as 8 if limited to integers.
She has a sociopath's smile. That's someone's thing I guess.
evilizac wrote:
She has a sociopath's smile. That's someone's thing I guess.
I like that. I'd consider going all the way up to 9 if she didn't have words on her face which is kinda a turn off.
Space wrote:
Remember the time Atomic tried to convince us Lena Dunham was hot?


Not hot enough.
Space wrote:
Sue Palka?

Helen Mirren?

Charlotte Rampling?


Not hot enough.

I still might.

Definitely hot enough 20 years ago, probably not now.
Sidehatch wrote:
Dakota Johnson?


Hot enough. but I wouldn't mate.  Wouldn't want to dilute the smackie gene pool.
I wrote:



I don't rate 12 year olds.
I don't know about this thread…