DeathFromAbove1979
Joined: November 29, 2006 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5038
Re: ITT, we shallowly objectify other people by discussing their appearance.
July 27, 2016 at 07:31 PM UTC
#
I wrote:
Sooooooo, Rachel C00k?
She seems like your standard, empty eyed model. 7/10. Would throw the bone if need be.
jrpa
Joined: September 03, 2013 at 03:15 PM UTC
Posts: 29999
Re: ITT, we shallowly objectify other people by discussing their appearance.
July 27, 2016 at 07:40 PM UTC
#
Some of the photos on her instagram looks like Fiona Apple's head (circa 1996) has been photoshopped on an otherwise attractive woman. Docking a point or two for that.
grateful
Joined: October 15, 2008 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 11564
Re: ITT, we shallowly objectify other people by discussing their appearance.
July 27, 2016 at 07:42 PM UTC
#
Annie Yu?
Sidehatch
Joined: October 04, 2011 at 04:33 AM UTC
Posts: 25687
Re: ITT, we shallowly objectify other people by discussing their appearance.
July 27, 2016 at 07:44 PM UTC
#
Dakota Johnson?
Space Freely
Joined: December 13, 2014 at 07:28 PM UTC
Posts: 11019
Re: ITT, we shallowly objectify other people by discussing their appearance.
July 27, 2016 at 07:48 PM UTC
#
Sue Palka?
Helen Mirren?
Charlotte Rampling?
walk,on,by
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: ITT, we shallowly objectify other people by discussing their appearance.
July 27, 2016 at 08:03 PM UTC
#
Can everybody just post photos of themselves and their significant others? And then we'll let the judging begin.
sweetcell
Joined: July 18, 2006 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 22608
Re: ITT, we shallowly objectify other people by discussing their appearance.
July 27, 2016 at 08:07 PM UTC
#
walk,on,by wrote:
Can everybody just post photos of themselves and their significant others? And then we'll let the judging begin.
you first? ;D
Sidehatch
Joined: October 04, 2011 at 04:33 AM UTC
Posts: 25687
Re: ITT, we shallowly objectify other people by discussing their appearance.
July 27, 2016 at 08:24 PM UTC
#
ok I'll start

hutch
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: ITT, we shallowly objectify other people by discussing their appearance.
July 27, 2016 at 08:27 PM UTC
#
^always wearing turtlenecks…
jrpa
Joined: September 03, 2013 at 03:15 PM UTC
Posts: 29999
Re: ITT, we shallowly objectify other people by discussing their appearance.
July 27, 2016 at 08:33 PM UTC
#
*insert pussy joke here*
grateful
Joined: October 15, 2008 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 11564
Re: ITT, we shallowly objectify other people by discussing their appearance.
July 27, 2016 at 08:36 PM UTC
#
jrpa
Joined: September 03, 2013 at 03:15 PM UTC
Posts: 29999
Re: ITT, we shallowly objectify other people by discussing their appearance.
July 27, 2016 at 08:38 PM UTC
#
This is me, dudes:

Feel free to objectify me.
jrpa
Joined: September 03, 2013 at 03:15 PM UTC
Posts: 29999
Re: ITT, we shallowly objectify other people by discussing their appearance.
July 27, 2016 at 08:39 PM UTC
#
I wrote:

The chick is a solid 7.5. Would go as high as 8 if limited to integers.
Isaac
Joined: June 04, 2003 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 373
Re: ITT, we shallowly objectify other people by discussing their appearance.
July 27, 2016 at 08:44 PM UTC
#
She has a sociopath's smile. That's someone's thing I guess.
jrpa
Joined: September 03, 2013 at 03:15 PM UTC
Posts: 29999
Re: ITT, we shallowly objectify other people by discussing their appearance.
July 27, 2016 at 08:47 PM UTC
#
evilizac wrote:
She has a sociopath's smile. That's someone's thing I guess.
I like that. I'd consider going all the way up to 9 if she didn't have words on her face which is kinda a turn off.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: ITT, we shallowly objectify other people by discussing their appearance.
July 27, 2016 at 08:56 PM UTC
#
Space wrote:
Remember the time Atomic tried to convince us Lena Dunham was hot?
Not hot enough.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: ITT, we shallowly objectify other people by discussing their appearance.
July 27, 2016 at 08:58 PM UTC
#
Space wrote:
Sue Palka?
Helen Mirren?
Charlotte Rampling?
Not hot enough.
I still might.
Definitely hot enough 20 years ago, probably not now.
vansmack
Joined: October 04, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 19725
Re: ITT, we shallowly objectify other people by discussing their appearance.
July 27, 2016 at 08:59 PM UTC
#
Sidehatch wrote:
Dakota Johnson?
Hot enough. but I wouldn't mate. Wouldn't want to dilute the smackie gene pool.
Space Freely
Joined: December 13, 2014 at 07:28 PM UTC
Posts: 11019
Re: ITT, we shallowly objectify other people by discussing their appearance.
July 27, 2016 at 11:11 PM UTC
#
I wrote:

I don't rate 12 year olds.
hutch
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: ITT, we shallowly objectify other people by discussing their appearance.
July 27, 2016 at 11:16 PM UTC
#
I don't know about this thread…