I know julian will be happy with this devlopment

the artificial intelligence thread
this can be skipped it didn't turn out as clever as I thought.. but if you are interested in AI still an interesting article and I briefly had fun throwing nonsense at Gemini
so while out securing my papacy I had to chuckle over this story in Wired about how a flaw in AI is that it will try to explain/provide an answer to what ever made up idiom you can think of.
https://www.wired.com/story/google-ai-overviews-meaning/
But sadly the killjoys over at Google caught on to the use of "You Can’t Lick a Badger Twice" and have an explanation for being a fake idiom, etc
I threw at Gemini it "The Cat Got Lost In the Cupboard" a couple weeks ago and it did try to explain it, but sadly the looks like fixed this. The answer was then was "That's a fun and evocative phrase" and then tried to give explanation, now you get
"The cat got lost in the cupboard" is a literal phrase, meaning that a cat physically went into a cupboard and then couldn't find its way out.
It's not a common idiom or a phrase with a hidden, metaphorical meaning in English. If you heard someone say this, they would simply be describing a situation where their cat became stuck or disoriented inside a cupboard.
so while out securing my papacy I had to chuckle over this story in Wired about how a flaw in AI is that it will try to explain/provide an answer to what ever made up idiom you can think of.
https://www.wired.com/story/google-ai-overviews-meaning/
But sadly the killjoys over at Google caught on to the use of "You Can’t Lick a Badger Twice" and have an explanation for being a fake idiom, etc
I threw at Gemini it "The Cat Got Lost In the Cupboard" a couple weeks ago and it did try to explain it, but sadly the looks like fixed this. The answer was then was "That's a fun and evocative phrase" and then tried to give explanation, now you get
"The cat got lost in the cupboard" is a literal phrase, meaning that a cat physically went into a cupboard and then couldn't find its way out.
It's not a common idiom or a phrase with a hidden, metaphorical meaning in English. If you heard someone say this, they would simply be describing a situation where their cat became stuck or disoriented inside a cupboard.
TIL using the " udm=14 " parameter on your google search supresses the fake AI results:
https://www.google.com/search?q=9:30%20club&udm=14
https://www.google.com/search?q=9:30%20club&udm=14
grateful wrote:very interesting, using code against itself
TIL using the " udm=14 " parameter on your google search supresses the fake AI results:
https://www.google.com/search?q=9:30%20club&udm=14
Was looking at the 'notes' for a request I put to chatgpt. not sure what this means, but love the sound of it
I’m dealing with a shapely error relating to numpy objects for geometry arrays.
yikes, this map… https://chatgpt.com/s/m_6841ada13074819187bb1e4d3011e914
I love that it labeled Australia as Yemen
I’m dealing with a shapely error relating to numpy objects for geometry arrays.
yikes, this map… https://chatgpt.com/s/m_6841ada13074819187bb1e4d3011e914
I love that it labeled Australia as Yemen
Here is your life hack for today
The AI overview gets disabled if you add in a cuss word. Put this at the end of your search string:
-fuck
It tells Google not to include that word, but it still disables the AI overview.
The AI overview gets disabled if you add in a cuss word. Put this at the end of your search string:
-fuck
It tells Google not to include that word, but it still disables the AI overview.
let's be serious for a second, do you read those AI overviews and say
"this is shite, those stupid links below that are pointing to the wrong sites and places to spend my money are much better, please for the love of god, don't give me more accurate information"
"this is shite, those stupid links below that are pointing to the wrong sites and places to spend my money are much better, please for the love of god, don't give me more accurate information"
Blasphemer-Hatch wrote:
let's be serious for a second, do you read those AI overviews and say
"this is shite, those stupid links below that are pointing to the wrong sites and places to spend my money are much better, please for the love of god, don't give me more accurate information"
your blind trust of AI is… disturbing.
sweetcell wrote:I wouldn't say blind…see my previous postBlasphemer-Hatch wrote:
let's be serious for a second, do you read those AI overviews and say
"this is shite, those stupid links below that are pointing to the wrong sites and places to spend my money are much better, please for the love of god, don't give me more accurate information"
your blind trust of AI is… disturbing.
So let me get this straight: you’re saying *‘I’m going to use Google to search for things, but I’ll disable the AI Overview… because I don’t trust AI. Instead, I trust a list of outdated, ad-filled results that make me scroll through five pages of SEO fluff just to maybe find the answer I wanted"
Seems like something a vinly lover might says, so that tracks
Sources do confirm to me that Sweets lovemaking prowess is best described as vinly.
hey, that's how you know its me and not AI…
vinly-Hatch wrote:
Was looking at the 'notes' for a request I put to chatgpt. not sure what this means, but love the sound of it
I’m dealing with a shapely error relating to numpy objects for geometry arrays.
yikes, this map… https://chatgpt.com/s/m_6841ada13074819187bb1e4d3011e914
I love that it labeled Australia as Yemen
Have you or anyone else asked it to illustrate colorless green ideas sleeping furiously?
How many copyright violations are present
Plus I learned today that Jane Austen and Mary Shelley are sisters
Plus I learned today that Jane Austen and Mary Shelley are sisters
*were
AI is going to create so much dislocation.
If we are optimistic we can say AI will help by doing things we used to do….
But who gets the gains from that efficiency? Looking at the world we live in as it IS I think those efficiency gains will be translated into $ for those in control of AI and government. I don’t think the people no longer needed to do the work will be compensated much above subsistence level.
Julian’s America will celebrate but inequality will become even more pronounced and that will also mean the end of any democratic norms. We will live in authoritarian regimes presided over by puppets that do the bidding of those that control AI.
This is all not very hard to imagine because we already are seeing signs of it….and beginning to live it.
If we are optimistic we can say AI will help by doing things we used to do….
But who gets the gains from that efficiency? Looking at the world we live in as it IS I think those efficiency gains will be translated into $ for those in control of AI and government. I don’t think the people no longer needed to do the work will be compensated much above subsistence level.
Julian’s America will celebrate but inequality will become even more pronounced and that will also mean the end of any democratic norms. We will live in authoritarian regimes presided over by puppets that do the bidding of those that control AI.
This is all not very hard to imagine because we already are seeing signs of it….and beginning to live it.
As if on cue ran into this just now:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/yourmoney/article-14785245/bloodbath-tearing-middle-class-US-economy.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/yourmoney/article-14785245/bloodbath-tearing-middle-class-US-economy.html
grateful wrote:
*were
They still live on in the hearts of many (content producers) sheesh
I think there was a spelling error and it was supposed to say: describing him as a "terrible wanker"