why you gotta be disrespecting blacks Imus!!!!

Originally posted by TheDirector217:

Originally posted by Roadbike Mankie:
I thought that was about tons of white folk dying to free the blacks.

No, it was some human beings doing the right thing. Or a bunch of people overwhelmed by their "white privilege". Whichever came first.

North of the Mason-Dixon line, of course . . .

Then why is it black folk seem to forget the sacrifice many white folk made in the name of 'doing the right thing'?

Look, regardless of what you think, I am not a racist, I simply have no problem discussing 'sensitive' issues with anyone and will always speak my mind regardless of wether it's considered pc or not. I just get sick of a segment of black society who want to blame white people for everything that goes wrong in their life. The Jessie "hymietown" Jacksons and Al "false whitey rape allegations" Sharpton brigade. Slavery was a long time ago, it's time to move on already….I've moved on from the Germans bombing the crap out of my grandma's house, and that was only in 1944. And in the interest of equal opportunity I also get tired of hearing the Vietnam vets bellyaching and feeling sorry for themselves over their past.

You may think I'm right or wrong in my views, and that's fine, I respect your opinions, but it doesn't make me a racist.

<img src="http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y25/team_dupek/ad224900.jpg" alt=" - " />

Why are they sitting in front of a Confederate flag?

Originally posted by Roadbike Mankie:
….and what's all this racism between dark and lighter skinned blacks? Now that's some 'effd up shit. They can't even get along within the race.

They? you ignorant twat. for real. look at all of europe. since like forever. look at the british isles. you've got micks blowing up limies, limies beating down micks …

Originally posted by TheDirector217:

Originally posted by Roadbike Mankie:
I thought that was about tons of white folk dying to free the blacks.

No, it was some human beings doing the right thing. Or a bunch of people overwhelmed by their "white privilege". Whichever came first.

North of the Mason-Dixon line, of course . . .

Actualy it was a conflict of states rights v federal rights.

Originally posted by _Sexy Fitsum_:

Originally posted by Roadbike Mankie:
….and what's all this racism between dark and lighter skinned blacks? Now that's some 'effd up shit. They can't even get along within the race.

They? you ignorant twat. for real. look at all of europe. since like forever. look at the british isles. you've got micks blowing up limies, limies beating down micks …

And I suppose "micks" and "limeys" aren't racist slurs then? We weren't discussing Europe, but we can if you like. Just today on bbc.com there's a story of two Polish blokes getting beaten up by a gang of English morons. Then we have the issue of the Italian Police beating the crap out of English football supporters for no reason. State sponsored racism if you ask me.

What's your issue with 'they'?

they
One entry found for they.


Main Entry: they
Pronunciation: '[th]A
Function: pronoun, plural in construction
Etymology: Middle English, from Old Norse their, masculine plural demonstrative & personal pronoun; akin to Old English thæt that
1 a : those ones – used as third person pronoun serving as the plural of he, she, or it or referring to a group of two or more individuals not all of the same sex <they dance well> b : 1HE 2 – often used with an indefinite third person singular antecedent <everyone knew where they stood – E. L. Doctorow> <nobody has to go to school if they don't want to – N. Y. Times>
2 : PEOPLE 2 – used in a generic sense <as lazy as they come>
usage They used as an indefinite subject (sense 2) is sometimes objected to on the grounds that it does not have an antecedent. Not every pronoun requires an antecedent, however. The indefinite they is used in all varieties of contexts and is standard.

Originally posted by Roadbike Mankie:

Originally posted by TheDirector217:

Originally posted by Roadbike Mankie:
I thought that was about tons of white folk dying to free the blacks.

No, it was some human beings doing the right thing. Or a bunch of people overwhelmed by their "white privilege". Whichever came first.

North of the Mason-Dixon line, of course . . .

Then why is it black folk seem to forget the sacrifice many white folk made in the name of 'doing the right thing'?

Look, regardless of what you think, I am not a racist, I simply have no problem discussing 'sensitive' issues with anyone and will always speak my mind regardless of wether it's considered pc or not. I just get sick of a segment of black society who want to blame white people for everything that goes wrong in their life. The Jessie "hymietown" Jacksons and Al "false whitey rape allegations" Sharpton brigade. Slavery was a long time ago, it's time to move on already….I've moved on from the Germans bombing the crap out of my grandma's house, and that was only in 1944. And in the interest of equal opportunity I also get tired of hearing the Vietnam vets bellyaching and feeling sorry for themselves over their past.

You may think I'm right or wrong in my views, and that's fine, I respect your opinions, but it doesn't make me a racist.

For the record, I don't think you're a racist. I read your posts thoroughly to make sure I don't lump you in with Grand Wizard Dupek. You've actually brought up some valid points & questions. Hard as it is to believe, I agree with some of your points - to a fault. "The man keeping us down" thing got old a little while ago, even if it is still true & occuring to this day. Black folk as a while need to just go out & "get it" period. There's a number of us out there doing their thing, but there's also a number of us whining about "the man". I echo your views with the "Vietnam" argument. I simply hold onto the creed that we'll get it right one day . . .

At the same time, though, unless you're Black or hang with a contingent of Black folk on a regular basis (don't know if you do or don't - it's irrelevant right now), its hard for you to comment. Shouldn't talk about the Indian until you've walked in his moccasins.

In summary, no I don't think you're a racist. I respect the fact that you've stated (kinda figured that already ;) )you're a str8 shooter & you're not afraid to stand by your PC or un-PC statements. Unlike other people here who make racist/un-PC statements, then get all sensitive & "woe-is-me" when others call them on it & expose them for the bitches they are. But I digress . . . . . Good day, Sir Mankie. Have a smashing day. This was an enlightening exchange.

Originally posted by RatBastard:
Actualy it was a conflict of states rights v federal rights.

If you really believe that, I got some nice swampland in Florida & a beach house in Ohio to sell you. ;)

If you can sell any real estate down here in Florida at the moment, I tip my hat to you my good man!

Originally posted by Roadbike Mankie:
If you can sell any real estate down here in Florida at the moment, I tip my hat to you my good man!

I can fleece with the best of 'em, homey.

"I sell ice in the winter/
I sell fire in hell/
I am a hustler, baby/
I'll sell water to a well"

- Jay-Z

NEVER MIND THE BOLLOCKS!!!! :D

Originally posted by TheDirector217:

Originally posted by RatBastard:
Actualy it was a conflict of states rights v federal rights.

If you really believe that, I got some nice swampland in Florida &amp; a beach house in Ohio to sell you. ;)

I only believe it because it is a fact. Granted one of the most visible and qute frankly highly offensive issues that fell under the states rights umbrella was the slavery issue, however that issue -> in and of itself <- was not the cause behind the conflict.

After watching every cable show still trying to make this a story I have to say, to paraphrase Allen Iverson - We talking about Imus. We not talking about someone relevant in society. We talking about Imus. Imus. We talking about a ridiculous cowboy hat wearing douche that no one takes seriously. We talking about Imus. We talking about Imus.

How come no one ever brings up the movie "White Chicks?"

At least you got to hear from the team.

Originally posted by RatBastard:

Originally posted by TheDirector217:

Originally posted by RatBastard:
Actualy it was a conflict of states rights v federal rights.

If you really believe that, I got some nice swampland in Florida &amp; a beach house in Ohio to sell you. ;)

I only believe it because it is a fact. Granted one of the most visible and qute frankly highly offensive issues that fell under the states rights umbrella was the slavery issue, however that issue -&gt; in and of itself &lt;- was not the cause behind the conflict.

What he said. I guess Director went to some Islamist school where they also teach that the holocaust never happened.

Originally posted by Mobius:
After watching every cable show still trying to make this a story I have to say, to paraphrase Allen Iverson - We talking about Imus. We not talking about someone relevant in society. We talking about Imus. Imus. We talking about a ridiculous cowboy hat wearing douche that no one takes seriously. We talking about Imus. We talking about Imus.

That's some classic shit right there. :D

Originally posted by RatBastard:
I only believe it because it is a fact. Granted one of the most visible and qute frankly highly offensive issues that fell under the states rights umbrella was the slavery issue, however that issue -&gt; in and of itself &lt;- was not the cause behind the conflict.

pass the pipe, 'cause i want some of that stuff… seriously, saying that the war was caused by a generalized, legalistic "state vs federal" dissagreement is simply wrong. was the North up in arms about education budgets? were Southern states going to war for the right to conduct foreign trade and affairs?

please argue against this: "if the North had not insisted on abolition, or if the South was willing to abandon slavery, the Civil War would never have happened." i double-dog dare you.

Another Marxist heard from…

i see that you didn't argue my point… OFF TO THE GULAGS!!! :)

(actually, had you argued my point, i would have ordered the same outcome…)

Originally posted by DriveWay:
How come no one ever brings up the movie "White Chicks?"

Because they are making fun of white people, that is allowed.

Originally posted by sweetcell:

Originally posted by RatBastard:
I only believe it because it is a fact. Granted one of the most visible and qute frankly highly offensive issues that fell under the states rights umbrella was the slavery issue, however that issue -&gt; in and of itself &lt;- was not the cause behind the conflict.

pass the pipe, 'cause i want some of that stuff… seriously, saying that the war was caused by a generalized, legalistic "state vs federal" dissagreement is simply wrong. was the North up in arms about education budgets? were Southern states going to war for the right to conduct foreign trade and affairs?

please argue against this: "if the North had not insisted on abolition, or if the South was willing to abandon slavery, the Civil War would never have happened." i double-dog dare you.

I second my man S Dot Cell's e-motion. You can't really hold up a "technicality" as the basis of an argument. If the state vs. federal thing has to get held up, I'd like to introduce a couple more:

1) Paris & Britney just sincerely forgot to put on some panties ALL those days
2) Ashlee Simpson really thought lip syncing would help her acid reflux situation
3) Janet's titty really was the victim of a wardrobe malfunction
4) Slick Willie sincerely needed Ms. Lewinsky to moisten his cigar for him

There's some technicalities for that ass, pal. ;)