Guiny
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Lance Armstrong for President~!
July 23, 2004 at 03:00 PM UTC
#
That list made me laugh way too loud at work!!!!!!
mankie
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Lance Armstrong for President~!
July 23, 2004 at 03:28 PM UTC
#
Has anyne seen the interviews with Sherryl Crowe at the tour….they're hilarious. She tries to answer 'cycling' questions but you can see on her face she's wanting to say, "I don't fucking know, I'm just his girlfriend"
pepper*sans*salt
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: Lance Armstrong for President~!
July 23, 2004 at 07:38 PM UTC
#
I wanna give Lance a big shoutout for giving France another reason to hate our guts. :mad:
markie
Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 13178
Re: Lance Armstrong for President~!
July 23, 2004 at 07:51 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by Bollocks:
I agree 100%…if you gave Armstrong the same bike Merckz was riding during his reign and set him off on the tour, and on the exact same course, there's no doubt in my mind that Armstrong could not have beaten Merckz time….
I think you are way off here. I dont think bikes have changed that much, what has changed is knowledge of sports physiology and advanced training methods. Also Merckx won a lot of other races, he did not just concentrate to peak for the tour. That was mostly a Greg Lemond invention.
Rhett Miller
Joined: November 15, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 17762
Re: Lance Armstrong for President~!
July 23, 2004 at 07:54 PM UTC
#
Seems like if he's got three young children at home, he would have made a better effort to save his marriage. But what do I know.
Originally posted by Bollocks:
Originally posted by Rhett Miller:
[QB] Leaving her to raise three kids, all aged five or less, on her own. Nice guy.
I'm sure the huge alimony/child support check every month helps a little….and for the record, he's pulled out of the olympics because he wants to spend time with his kids after the tour. Let me tell you something from experience Rhett, sometimes the American injustice system prevents dads from seeing their kids as much as they'd like. Some fucking senile judge decides who, when and how often a dad gets to spend time with his own flesh and blood, so I don't want to hear any bullshit about "leaving her to raise three kids, all aged five or less, on her own", that just shows how ignorant you can be sometimes.
markie
Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 13178
Re: Lance Armstrong for President~!
July 23, 2004 at 07:56 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by pepper*sans*salt:
I wanna give Lance a big shoutout for giving France another reason to hate our guts. :mad:
Why would they hate your guts?
Its just a dude riding a bike. His souplesse has been a joy to watch.
markie
Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 13178
Re: Lance Armstrong for President~!
July 23, 2004 at 08:07 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by Rhett Miller:
[QB] Seems like if he's got three young children at home, he would have made a better effort to save his marriage. But what do I know.
I dont think it takes a bucketful of empathy to realise that becoming a five or seven time tour champion and all round media whore might completely change your life, and cause you and you partner to grow totally apart.
Rhett Miller
Joined: November 15, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 17762
Re: Lance Armstrong for President~!
July 23, 2004 at 08:14 PM UTC
#
So when you start winning Nobel Prizes for all of your fine work in the science world, that will cause you to grow apart from your wife, divorce her, and seek out a lame rockstar to date? Oh well, at least there probably won't be small children involved.
And why pump out three children in give years if you've grown that far apart?
Rhett Miller
Joined: November 15, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 17762
Re: Lance Armstrong for President~!
July 23, 2004 at 08:30 PM UTC
#
Nah, as I said, whatta I know.
Great biker? Definitely. Great human being? I dunno, and quite honestly, I don't really care. Was just blowing off steam on a Friday afternoon.
Gotta say though, he's one of those 32 year oldswho looks 40. Guess it's the cancer and the sun that has aged him.
Originally posted by Bollocks:
Originally posted by Rhett Miller:
So when you start winning Nobel Prizes for all of your fine work in the science world, that will cause you to grow apart from your wife, divorce her, and seek out a lame rockstar to date? Oh well, at least there probably won't be small children involved.
And why pump out three children in give years if you've grown that far apart?
So we can assume it was his fault, and his fault alone for the break up of the marraige can we?
markie
Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 13178
Re: Lance Armstrong for President~!
July 23, 2004 at 08:30 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by Rhett Miller:
So when you start winning Nobel Prizes……
Scientists generally dont travel as often as pro-cyclists, nor do they acheive the same recognition. How many Lance adverts are there now, and how many featuring famous scientists.?Along with this few scientists make much money.
But I can see that if a scientist did become rich and famous the temptation to run off with a young promising postdoc might be tempting. Actually that is a not too unfamiliar story, if you ignore the rich and famous bit.
People grow apart under the best circumstances. Others have unrealistic goals when entering a marriage. I dont think its hard to see how pissing off for three weeks at a time to go for a little cycle could put a strain on things.
markie
Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 13178
Re: Lance Armstrong for President~!
July 23, 2004 at 08:40 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by Bollocks:
Lets start with carbon fibre shall we, that around in Merckx day was it?.Eddie's bike weighed waaaaaaaaaaaay more than Lances does.
I bet not:
"Carbon-fibre is another innovation, dropping the weight of a racing bike from 9kg to less than 7kg."
from
http://www.viamichelin.com/viamichelin/gbr/tpl/mag3/art20030501/htm/int_liggett.htm Plus steel frames are really compliant. They are often the most comfortable to ride.
Those click levers weigh about a pound more than the down tube simple old fashioned levers.
markie
Joined: October 15, 2001 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 13178
Re: Lance Armstrong for President~!
July 23, 2004 at 08:49 PM UTC
#
Originally posted by Bollocks:
Originally posted by mark e smith:
"Carbon-fibre is another innovation, dropping the weight of a racing bike from 9kg to less than 7kg."
At that level of cycling, that is a lot.
Not so much compared to the overall bike+rider weight.
Do you think Lance would still have won the tour if his bike weighed 2 or 3 pounds more?
I think he would.