RE: CT School Massacre

Go ahead Ratbastard.. have the last word.. enjoy it..

you want lots of guns out there … great..enjoy them.. but every time you hear schoolchildren die I want you to think THAT YOU MADE THAT POSSIBLE MAN.. OWN IT.

hutch wrote:

RatBastard wrote:

hutch wrote:

RatBastard wrote:

hutch wrote:

atomicfront wrote:

hutch wrote:
people who publicly "mourn" the death of those killed at Newton (post pictures of them on Facebook etc) but insist we can't do anything about preventing these things are really pissing me off.

they are responsible.  that is what they should post on their facebook pages.

To say there is nothing we can do.. let us just weep and get ready to weep again because we will not change… that is crazy.

Anyways I'm done… I feel sorry for human beings who accept more children be mowed down in the future and stand in the way of even attempting to try to do something.

Moreover, I feel they are accessories to whatever happens in the future.  EDITED

There really isn't anything we can do to prevent a determined person from committing any given crime.  What I find sad and totally offensive is a person who is supposed top be our president invading a memorial service and disrespecting the families by turning their sorrow into a political speech and making empty promises that could never be kept not matter how his intentions were.  We do need to work on the issue but we need to address the real problem and not have a knee jerk reaction that libtards everywhere love to do.  Taking guns away form law abiding citizens will never stop criminals from obtaining guns nor will it stop them from using them to do their deeds.  Just as we don't ban cars because some people drive drunk and kill others, we shouldn't band guns..  It isn't the gun that is the problem, it is the irresponsible gun owner (just like the mother in this case).  I am not sure how much more clearly I can make the point.  If you choose to ignore logic, reason, and fact and you want to fool yourself into thinking that making something illegal will solve the problem, you are living in a fantasy world.  The bottom line is that making guns (or anything) illegal will not stop people from obtaining them.

Oh I'm sorry.. I forgot GUNS dont' kill ..they were invented to kill u moron. THAT IS WHAT THEY DO. People do not buy guns to fondle themselves with or make popcorn last I checked

Yes, make them illegal and get them off the streets.. that is the answer.. less guns less violence

but lets say we don't want to fully make them illegal… lets say we say everyone can have ONE little gun if they want… no semi-automatics, no huge ammo, etc etc

THAT would be a start

Again (please read slowly this time so you will understand), making something illegal will NOT take it off the streets.  If that were the case there would be no marajuana to be found anywhere.

Guns DON'T kill people.  PEOPLE DO.  That guns did not walk itself out of the woman's house, put itself in a stolen car, drive itself to a school, open the door, walk into he school, and start firing itself.  Libtards ALWAYS want to blame someone or something else for their actions.

Of course we can take guns off the streets.. why not? its been done in plenty of countries..  and even if we can't take them all off the streets taking a lot of them would be a start.. or how about preventing new ones from entering the streets. remember repeat after me: LESS GUNS LESS VIOLENCE.

Bottom line you want to enable future violence.

This isn't about liberals or conservatives.. you are the one politicizing the issue.. certainly not me or the President.

If it makes you happy to think so, go right on believing that making something illegal will stop it form happening.  Tell that to the crack heads, tell that to the guy at the next show you are at when he sparks up a  joint.  Bammy politicized the hole issue with his campaign speech (BTW will someone tell him that the election is over) in CT when he disrespected the families.  Since talking to you is like talking to a brick, I'll let you go on with your rants.  If you decide to make a solid, well reasoned, cogent point let me know and I'll come back.

hey RB,

europe and canada have less guns and more laws… and they don't have nearly the number of mass shootings that the US does.  like once a decade instead of several times a year.

you're proposing that more guns and less laws will make us safer despite evidence to the contrary.

discuss.

Sixth Grader Brings Gun To School, Says Parents Told Him To Carry It For Protection After Newtown Shootings
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sixth-grader-brings-gun-to-school-says-parents-told-him-to-carry-it-for-protection-after-newtown-shootings/

excellent!  let's have 11 year olds walking around with guns.  the NRA's dream.  what could go wrong?  the kids will be SAFER!

RatBastard wrote:

hutch wrote:

RatBastard wrote:

hutch wrote:

RatBastard wrote:

hutch wrote:

atomicfront wrote:

hutch wrote:
people who publicly "mourn" the death of those killed at Newton (post pictures of them on Facebook etc) but insist we can't do anything about preventing these things are really pissing me off.

they are responsible.  that is what they should post on their facebook pages.

To say there is nothing we can do.. let us just weep and get ready to weep again because we will not change… that is crazy.

Anyways I'm done… I feel sorry for human beings who accept more children be mowed down in the future and stand in the way of even attempting to try to do something.

Moreover, I feel they are accessories to whatever happens in the future.  EDITED

There really isn't anything we can do to prevent a determined person from committing any given crime.  What I find sad and totally offensive is a person who is supposed top be our president invading a memorial service and disrespecting the families by turning their sorrow into a political speech and making empty promises that could never be kept not matter how his intentions were.  We do need to work on the issue but we need to address the real problem and not have a knee jerk reaction that libtards everywhere love to do.  Taking guns away form law abiding citizens will never stop criminals from obtaining guns nor will it stop them from using them to do their deeds.  Just as we don't ban cars because some people drive drunk and kill others, we shouldn't band guns..  It isn't the gun that is the problem, it is the irresponsible gun owner (just like the mother in this case).  I am not sure how much more clearly I can make the point.  If you choose to ignore logic, reason, and fact and you want to fool yourself into thinking that making something illegal will solve the problem, you are living in a fantasy world.  The bottom line is that making guns (or anything) illegal will not stop people from obtaining them.

Oh I'm sorry.. I forgot GUNS dont' kill ..they were invented to kill u moron. THAT IS WHAT THEY DO. People do not buy guns to fondle themselves with or make popcorn last I checked

Yes, make them illegal and get them off the streets.. that is the answer.. less guns less violence

but lets say we don't want to fully make them illegal… lets say we say everyone can have ONE little gun if they want… no semi-automatics, no huge ammo, etc etc

THAT would be a start

Again (please read slowly this time so you will understand), making something illegal will NOT take it off the streets.  If that were the case there would be no marajuana to be found anywhere.

Guns DON'T kill people.  PEOPLE DO.  That guns did not walk itself out of the woman's house, put itself in a stolen car, drive itself to a school, open the door, walk into he school, and start firing itself.  Libtards ALWAYS want to blame someone or something else for their actions.

Of course we can take guns off the streets.. why not? its been done in plenty of countries..  and even if we can't take them all off the streets taking a lot of them would be a start.. or how about preventing new ones from entering the streets. remember repeat after me: LESS GUNS LESS VIOLENCE.

Bottom line you want to enable future violence.

This isn't about liberals or conservatives.. you are the one politicizing the issue.. certainly not me or the President.

If it makes you happy to think so, go right on believing that making something illegal will stop it form happening.  Tell that to the crack heads, tell that to the guy at the next show you are at when he sparks up a  joint.  Bammy politicized the hole issue with his campaign speech (BTW will someone tell him that the election is over) in CT when he disrespected the families.  Since talking to you is like talking to a brick, I'll let you go on with your rants.  If you decide to make a solid, well reasoned, cogent point let me know and I'll come back.

Dude, give it a rest.  Romney lost.  Fucking deal with it and stop crying all the time.

Guns do not protect more than they destroy. They do not save more lives than they kill. They do not safeguard more families than they devastate. They do not add security more than they add fear, suspicion, antagonism and hate. As has been pointed out again and again: Guns, by there very existence, insist on their own use. <a href="http://blog.sfgate.com/morford/2012/12/18/death-to-all-guns/">And their use is, singularly and without reservation, death.</a>

grateful wrote:
Guns do not protect more than they destroy. They do not save more lives than they kill. They do not safeguard more families than they devastate. They do not add security more than they add fear, suspicion, antagonism and hate. As has been pointed out again and again: Guns, by there very existence, insist on their own use. &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.sfgate.com/morford/2012/12/18/death-to-all-guns/&quot;&gt;And their use is, singularly and without reservation, death.&lt;/a&gt;

that article is a great read.  thanks.

Thank you for this article.  My views have been changed by what has been happening.  I know many people who are gun collectors, and have a wide variety of assault weapons because they live in the country and use them for target practice. 

But, what other purpose do they really serve?  And would it really be that big of a deal if they weren't sold anymore?  So people wouldn't have the "cool" guns anymore.  I don't think I care about that any longer.

I think what happened in the movie theater, at the mall, and at the school should be enough for Americans to really think about WHY they feel like they need to have these types of weapons.

because they think they can overthrow the government with them

My former boss is a facebook friend and he just posted a link to a video to "Mike Huckabee" blaiming the shooting on the lack of prayer in public school.  And my former boss posted "Well said". 

Should i respond to this post or just delete him from facebook? 

delete from facebook.

fuck it, just delete facebook in general.  you'll be happier.

I find it's best to just "hide" those posts.  Trying to respond to that sort of thing just makes me more angry.

Someone I know the day after election day posted about how the country had lost its morality by re-electing Obama.  She got deleted.

That's what i keep telling my wife, but she doesn't listen. Who needs facebook when you have this board?

stevewizzle wrote:

fuck it, just delete facebook in general.&nbsp; you&#039;ll be happier.

James wrote:
Who needs facebook when you have this board?

yeah, sure, but you can't "like" things on this board.  fail!

sweetcell wrote:
hey RB,

europe and canada have less guns and more laws… and they don&#039;t have nearly the number of mass shootings that the US does.&nbsp; like once a decade instead of several times a year.

you&#039;re proposing that more guns and less laws will make us safer despite evidence to the contrary.

discuss.

That's what I thought.  Nothing but fucking crickets. 

Don't delete on FB.  Just block their feed from your timeline, that way if you have to go back and see their timeline, you can.  Plus they won't try to re-add you as a friend later and thus put you in an awkward spot…

vansmack wrote:
Don&#039;t delete on FB.&nbsp; Just block their feed from your timeline, that way if you have to go back and see their timeline, you can.&nbsp; Plus they won&#039;t try to re-add you as a friend later and thus put you in an awkward spot…

Who cares if it's awkward.  Do we really have to justify to someone why we don't want to hear where they had lunch or what was on their kid's report card?  Beyond just telling them "I don't really know you, and I don't really care what you ate for lunch today."?

Now lets get back to talking about how Obama is coming for our guns.

chaz wrote:
Who cares if it&#039;s awkward.&nbsp; Do we really have to justify to someone why we don&#039;t want to hear where they had lunch or what was on their kid&#039;s report card?&nbsp; Beyond just telling them &quot;I don&#039;t really know you, and I don&#039;t really care what you ate for lunch today.&quot;?

Because you never know what life has in store for you and when you made need to reach out to someone.  You don't have to heed my advice, but I wanted to point out that there was a much simpler scenario than deleting folks individually.

vansmack wrote:

chaz wrote:
Who cares if it&#039;s awkward.&nbsp; Do we really have to justify to someone why we don&#039;t want to hear where they had lunch or what was on their kid&#039;s report card?&nbsp; Beyond just telling them &quot;I don&#039;t really know you, and I don&#039;t really care what you ate for lunch today.&quot;?

Because you never know what life has in store for you and when you made need to reach out to someone.&nbsp; You don&#039;t have to heed my advice, but I wanted to point out that there was a much simpler scenario than deleting folks individually.

I hear ya.  I just got a different style, that's all.  It takes a village.