hopefully speaking on behalf of the board we would like to thank you for the monthly reminder and i'm sure women of all races will remain vigilant to protect themselves. now can you let it drop?
Nightclub Bill Seeks to Protect Underage Guests, and D.C
Thank you. I merely poasted this as Hoja had once accused me of supplying what he claimed were stats authoured by white supremicists, but were in fact from the FBI uniform code. Thereupon a witchhunt commenced directed against me and I was wrongly labelled as being racist. If you want to accuse anyone of racism, then accuse the FBI & DOJ for authoring the stats, if the stats are indeed bogus. While there is currently no link to the FBI stats (they were removed for being Un-PC) there IS a link to the DOJ stats. One wonders how long the DOJ stats will remain accessible via the net, as they are rather un-PC, as well.
The defense rests.
The defense rests.
<img src="http://lolcats2.com/full/Zorro.jpg" alt=" - " />
Originally posted by Dupek Chakra:You (or the dumbfuck you're quoting from) are misreading the stats given in the linked report. The gender and racial stats you refer to in Table 30 (page 43 of the pdf) are only of victims; the only stats regarding perpetrators are about whether or not they were unknown to the victims, i.e. strangers. Also, the "zero and ten" figure is misread from the footnote indicating that many of the figures were estimates "based on about 10 or fewer SAMPLE cases" (my emphasis).
"In the United States in 2005, 37,460 white females were sexually assaulted or raped by a black man, while between zero and ten black females were sexually assaulted or raped by a white man."
There were fewer than 10 white on black rapes.
This is the reason the sample was low.
There were fewer than 10 black women victims nationwide.
So you think there should be calls for a sweeping investigation at the DOJ as they are not doing a proper job with stats?
Rhett should chime in.
This is the reason the sample was low.
There were fewer than 10 black women victims nationwide.
So you think there should be calls for a sweeping investigation at the DOJ as they are not doing a proper job with stats?
Rhett should chime in.
Originally posted by beetsnotbeats:
Originally posted by Dupek Chakra:You (or the dumbfuck you're quoting from) are misreading the stats given in the linked report. The gender and racial stats you refer to in Table 30 (page 43 of the pdf) are only of victims; the only stats regarding perpetrators are about whether or not they were unknown to the victims, i.e. strangers. Also, the "zero and ten" figure is misread from the footnote indicating that many of the figures were estimates "based on about 10 or fewer SAMPLE cases" (my emphasis).
"In the United States in 2005, 37,460 white females were sexually assaulted or raped by a black man, while between zero and ten black females were sexually assaulted or raped by a white man."
Originally posted by Hoya Paranoia:
:D
Originally posted by Dupek Chakra:Mr. O'Reilly, none of your allegations are supported by the data and statistics published in the linked DOJ report.
There were fewer than 10 white on black rapes.
This is the reason the sample was low.
There were fewer than 10 black women victims nationwide.
Originally posted by kosmo:seriously, this thread is an embarrassment to the board. Any newbie who comes along and sees this is going to think we're all a bunch of beady-eyed bigots, when in fact only a few of us are….
hopefully speaking on behalf of the board we would like to thank you for the monthly reminder and i'm sure women of all races will remain vigilant to protect themselves. now can you let it drop?
i would once like to see the stats of people convicted of violent crimes who grew up on welfare opposed to those who didn't.
has anyone stopped to think its not so much about race as it is about people who grew up with nothing?
i bet the amount of blacks convicted of violent crimes that live in affluent neighborhoods is probably about the same as the number of whites!
has anyone stopped to think its not so much about race as it is about people who grew up with nothing?
i bet the amount of blacks convicted of violent crimes that live in affluent neighborhoods is probably about the same as the number of whites!
I agree with what you're saying, but it's shameful to use poverty as an excuse for violent crime. Especially for something like rape, where they're not doing it out of a sense of financial desperation.
Originally posted by le sonick:
i would once like to see the stats of people convicted of violent crimes who grew up on welfare opposed to those who didn't.
has anyone stopped to think its not so much about race as it is about people who grew up with nothing?
i bet the amount of blacks convicted of violent crimes that live in affluent neighborhoods is probably about the same as the number of whites!
Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:you're a moron, no one uses poverty as an "excuse"
I agree with what you're saying, but it's shameful to use poverty as an excuse for violent crime. Especially for something like rape, where they're not doing it out of a sense of financial desperation.
Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:yeah, i wasnt really using poverty exactly as the reason, but children growing up on welfare usually go to crappy schools, have mothers who beat the crap out of them, and fathers that beat the crap out of their mothers. they are more likely to go to crappy schools, live in bad conditions, therefore may not grow up learning any kind of value of other peoples rights, safety or lives.
I agree with what you're saying, but it's shameful to use poverty as an excuse for violent crime. Especially for something like rape, where they're not doing it out of a sense of financial desperation.
Originally posted by le sonick:
i would once like to see the stats of people convicted of violent crimes who grew up on welfare opposed to those who didn't.
has anyone stopped to think its not so much about race as it is about people who grew up with nothing?
i bet the amount of blacks convicted of violent crimes that live in affluent neighborhoods is probably about the same as the number of whites!
i just said "welfare" cause that would be easier to track than say, "kids who go to crappy schools"
Originally posted by le sonick:I know you didn't mean this. You're saying poor people "usually" beat their kids? Come on. That's not fair. There are lots of good poor people who love their kids.
but children growing up on welfare usually…have mothers who beat the crap out of them, and fathers that beat the crap out of their mothers…
Originally posted by The Vessel:yes. i didnt mean usually and i actually meant to take usually out and replace it with (are more likely to) as i think i did in another part of my post.
Originally posted by le sonick:I know you didn't mean this. You're saying poor people "usually" beat their kids? Come on. That's not fair. There are lots of good poor people who love their kids.
but children growing up on welfare usually…have mothers who beat the crap out of them, and fathers that beat the crap out of their mothers…
the neighborhood i live in has many families on welfare and without employment and i cant count the times i've seen women hit their kids on the street…so i cant imagine what must happen inside.
but yes, i meant more likely, not usually. sorry :)
does no one get what i am trying to say? people keep nitpicking the words i am using, making it seem like i am some horrible person who makes rash generalizations about people. i am assuming you take me as a real fuck.
but what i was trying to say, which i thought was pretty obvious, is that poverty and the effects of it, are more to blame for people committing violent crimes than race is. you guys arent really going to argue with that are you???????
but what i was trying to say, which i thought was pretty obvious, is that poverty and the effects of it, are more to blame for people committing violent crimes than race is. you guys arent really going to argue with that are you???????
Who is taking you as a "real fuck"? I said I agreed with what you said!
Originally posted by le sonick:
does no one get what i am trying to say? people keep nitpicking the words i am using, making it seem like i am some horrible person who makes rash generalizations about people. i am assuming you take me as a real fuck.
but what i was trying to say, which i thought was pretty obvious, is that poverty and the effects of it, are more to blame for people committing violent crimes than race is. you guys arent really going to argue with that are you???????
Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:well then i guess not you! ;)
Who is taking you as a "real fuck"? I said I agreed with what you said!
Originally posted by le sonick:
does no one get what i am trying to say? people keep nitpicking the words i am using, making it seem like i am some horrible person who makes rash generalizations about people. i am assuming you take me as a real fuck.
but what i was trying to say, which i thought was pretty obvious, is that poverty and the effects of it, are more to blame for people committing violent crimes than race is. you guys arent really going to argue with that are you???????
still though, sorry for all the crazy late night posts everyone!!
Race has nothing to do with Black rapists of white women. It's merely a happy coincidence.