sweetcell
Joined: July 18, 2006 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 22608
2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
September 15, 2009 at 04:45 PM UTC
#
Relaxer wrote:
Hope the show was good because that Buff/NE game was great
the show was great, totally worth missing the game - based on what they've been showing on the highlights, only the last 2 minutes were really spectacular. i caught the first quarter on the TV and listened to the second quarter on my drive down to the club and it didn't look/sound that amazing. i'm a big new england fan, so that might have had something to do with it…
first time i've heard of this:
American Indians look to high court WASHINGTON – A group of American Indians who find the Washington Redskins name offensive wants the Supreme Court to take up the matter.
The group late Monday asked the justices to review a lower court decision that favored the NFL team on a legal technicality.
The seven Native Americans have been working through the court system since 1992 to have the Redskins trademarks declared invalid. A U.S. Patent and Trademark Office panel ruled in their favor in 1999, but they've since suffered a series of defeats from judges who ruled that the plaintiffs waited too long to bring their suit in the first place.
A lawyer for the group says he'd like to see the court decide once and for all whether the Redskins name defames Native Americans.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4474771
serpent boy
Joined: February 08, 2005 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 449
Re: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
September 15, 2009 at 04:52 PM UTC
#
As a diehard Bengals fan, I'll forever be haunted by Stokley's fluke catch on Sunday. Ugh.
The Bills and Raiders had tough last minute losses, but at least they weren't Stokleyed.
sweetcell
Joined: July 18, 2006 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 22608
Re: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
September 15, 2009 at 05:05 PM UTC
#
because:
(yes, the hamburger network now does sports)
HoyaSaxa03
Joined: March 22, 2004 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 7053
Re: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
September 15, 2009 at 06:59 PM UTC
#
BookerT
Joined: October 30, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1410
Re: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
September 15, 2009 at 07:53 PM UTC
#
serpent wrote:
As a diehard Bengals fan, I'll forever be haunted by Stokley's fluke catch on Sunday. Ugh.
The Bills and Raiders had tough last minute losses, but at least they weren't Stokleyed.
yeah the bills and raiders just choked and/or were stupid at the end. the bengals finally put together a great drive to take the lead and then got stokleyed. i'm on the bengals bandwagon this year because i thought this was the best "hard knocks" yet, so that was rough.
DeathFromAbove1979
Joined: November 29, 2006 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5038
Re: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
September 16, 2009 at 07:26 AM UTC
#
I dunno what Id do if they changed the name. It would probably be something as lame as the Capitals, or the Nationals. Why can't we get something badass? Seriously? The front running names for the Nats were 'The Washington Monuments' and 'The Washington Greys'. What the hell.
elj
Joined: October 09, 2003 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5970
Re: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
September 16, 2009 at 10:21 AM UTC
#
I always assumed if they had to change the name, they'd change it to the Washington Skins, since most fans truncate it to that anyway.
K8teebug
Joined: August 03, 2004 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4126
Re: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
September 16, 2009 at 12:05 PM UTC
#
I do not like the Patriots.
imbecile
Joined: October 01, 2008 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 332
Re: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
September 16, 2009 at 12:29 PM UTC
#
DeathFromAbove1979 wrote:
I dunno what Id do if they changed the name. It would probably be something as lame as the Capitals, or the Nationals. Why can't we get something badass? Seriously? The front running names for the Nats were 'The Washington Monuments' and 'The Washington Greys'. What the hell.
I think the only name that would remotely keep people from going absolutely crazy, would be to right one of the great wrongs and give DC back the Bullets!
You're more than likely correct though, it'd be a pretty crap-tastic patriotic/political name of some-kind.
godsshoeshine
Joined: September 18, 2003 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4826
Re: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
September 16, 2009 at 03:41 PM UTC
#
i'd say the skins are more likely to win in the courtroom than the playoffs
thatguy
Joined: October 20, 1999 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1268
Re: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
September 16, 2009 at 06:55 PM UTC
#
they don't need to change the name, they just need to change the logo:

sweetcell
Joined: July 18, 2006 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 22608
Re: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
September 16, 2009 at 09:48 PM UTC
#
thatguy wrote:
they don't need to change the name, they just need to change the logo:

POTW
walkonby
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
September 16, 2009 at 10:41 PM UTC
#
did anybody catch the interview on stern with michael strahan. funny antics he revealed that went on in the locker room with players while he was on the giants. such as peeing on each other in the shower, taking pictures of their balls and putting it on other players cell phones screensavers, how one time the center (during a game) cut a hole in his uniform so his balls would hang out and eli manning would touch them with each snap. what is going on with these manly men football payers. fun stuff!! :o
sweetcell
Joined: July 18, 2006 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 22608
Re: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
September 17, 2009 at 01:05 AM UTC
#
walkonby wrote:
how one time the center (during a game) cut a hole in his uniform so his balls would hang out and eli manning would touch them with each snap.
you just made me spit red wine all over my keyboard. thanks, bitch :D
didn't realize football players, or NY giants at least, were so testicularly focused…
chaz
Joined: December 09, 2002 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 5111
Re: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
September 17, 2009 at 02:54 PM UTC
#
Anybody hear about the TV ratings for the first week of NFL games? The sunday game between the Giants and Redskins was the most watched regular season game EVER.
I'm actually reeling over this news. I'd kind of thought that the NFL had reach maximum market saturation….so personally this comes as not really good news to me. This will stoke the fires even more to penetrate other markets, with horrible ideas like moving some regular season games to London etc. Shit they are talking about having a fucking team in Europe in the next 10 years. Ughh.
sweetcell
Joined: July 18, 2006 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 22608
Re: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
September 17, 2009 at 04:04 PM UTC
#
chaz wrote:
Anybody hear about the TV ratings for the first week of NFL games? The sunday game between the Giants and Redskins was the most watched regular season game EVER.
I'm actually reeling over this news. I'd kind of thought that the NFL had reach maximum market saturation….so personally this comes as not really good news to me. This will stoke the fires even more to penetrate other markets, with horrible ideas like moving some regular season games to London etc. Shit they are talking about having a fucking team in Europe in the next 10 years. Ughh.
i had no idea. wow.
i have friends in denmark who are HUGE packers fans (i know… wtf). they stay up until 4 AM on sunday nights/monday morning watching NFL.
i wonder if the players union would oppose having a team in yurp.
godsshoeshine
Joined: September 18, 2003 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 4826
Re: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
September 17, 2009 at 04:04 PM UTC
#
i thought it was the most watched regular season sunday opener ever, but impressive none the less
hutch
Joined: Unknown
Posts: 0
Re: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
September 17, 2009 at 04:14 PM UTC
#
People are absolutely starved for American Football….
I don't get the game myself… 1 hour of play and 3 hours of commercials/sitting around…
But maybe I don't get the game because of the type of game the Redskins have been playing since I moved here 16 years ago..
Back in the mid-80s I enjoyed watching the 49ers.. That was a team! what with Montana/Young, Rice, Clark, Craig, Lott!
Oh and can't believe I forgot this: and BIll Walsh coaching! Boy was he ahead of his time.. I went to High School with his daughter Liz actually..
BookerT
Joined: October 30, 2001 at 06:01 AM UTC
Posts: 1410
Re: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
September 17, 2009 at 04:35 PM UTC
#
sweetcell
Joined: July 18, 2006 at 05:01 AM UTC
Posts: 22608
Re: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
September 17, 2009 at 05:01 PM UTC
#
hutch wrote:
I don't get the game myself…
that because no argentinians are in the NFL.