For Walky

love the warhol light switch.

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/23/16664514-lawsuit-alleges-purpose-of-scientology-is-taking-peoples-money?lite

how is this any different than christianity.  dont they just take your money too?



this is the personal house of a famous television minister.  jesus saves.

http://vitals.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/24/16678711-after-shootings-states-rethink-mental-health-cuts?lite

people never learn . . . until after the facts.

catholics . . . we believe what we want when we want.

http://gawker.com/5978597/catholic-hospital-chain-kills-wrongful-death-lawsuit-by-arguing-that-a-fetus-is-not-a-person

walkonby wrote:
http://vitals.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/24/16678711-after-shootings-states-rethink-mental-health-cuts?lite

people never learn . . . until after the facts.

i don't think those cuts had anything to do with the shootings. The parents of the guy in CT were rich.  They could afford mental health care.  and the guy in colorado was getting treatment.  the problem is guns.

atomicfront wrote:

walkonby wrote:
http://vitals.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/24/16678711-after-shootings-states-rethink-mental-health-cuts?lite

people never learn . . . until after the facts.

i don't think those cuts had anything to do with the shootings. The parents of the guy in CT were rich.  They could afford mental health care.  and the guy in colorado was getting treatment.  the problem is guns.

Parents could have had all the money in the world, if treatment was not available it does not matter.  The problem is that we always find an excuse for anyone who breaks the law and we hold no one personally responsible for his actions.  The libtards want things to be because mommy dressed him funny, daddy didn't say 'I love you' enough, or the breakfast cereal had too much sugar.  The problem is as much the gun as a spoon is the problem for a fat person being fat.

A state trooper stopped a 95-year-old woman on the interstate. As he was running her license, he discovered she had a concealed carry permit. He asked the woman if she had any firearms in the vehicle to which she replied "Yes. I have a .45 Smith & Wesson in the glove compartment, a 357 magnum in the console, and a 38 special in my purse." The trooper said "Lady what are you afraid of?" To which the woman said "Not a damn thing!"

RatBastard wrote:

atomicfront wrote:

walkonby wrote:
http://vitals.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/24/16678711-after-shootings-states-rethink-mental-health-cuts?lite

people never learn . . . until after the facts.

i don't think those cuts had anything to do with the shootings. The parents of the guy in CT were rich.  They could afford mental health care.  and the guy in colorado was getting treatment.  the problem is guns.

Parents could have had all the money in the world, if treatment was not available it does not matter.  The problem is that we always find an excuse for anyone who breaks the law and we hold no one personally responsible for his actions.  The libtards want things to be because mommy dressed him funny, daddy didn't say 'I love you' enough, or the breakfast cereal had too much sugar.  The problem is as much the gun as a spoon is the problem for a fat person being fat.

God you are such a dumb dick. How exactly does the spoon hurt anybody else apart from the fat person? Oh wow, another stupid fucking argument from a stupid idiot. And name me one person of wealth who doesn't have treatment available? You can't unless you lie, which you will surely do because you're proudly ignorant and Republicans just looooove to dismiss academics with their education and research and data and facts.

Connecticut. Colorado. Arizona. What links all of these? Availability of guns. Period. Argue that you dumb fucking cripple.

Relaxer wrote:

RatBastard wrote:

atomicfront wrote:

walkonby wrote:
http://vitals.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/24/16678711-after-shootings-states-rethink-mental-health-cuts?lite

people never learn . . . until after the facts.

i don't think those cuts had anything to do with the shootings. The parents of the guy in CT were rich.  They could afford mental health care.  and the guy in colorado was getting treatment.  the problem is guns.

Parents could have had all the money in the world, if treatment was not available it does not matter.  The problem is that we always find an excuse for anyone who breaks the law and we hold no one personally responsible for his actions.  The libtards want things to be because mommy dressed him funny, daddy didn't say 'I love you' enough, or the breakfast cereal had too much sugar.  The problem is as much the gun as a spoon is the problem for a fat person being fat.

God you are such a dumb dick. How exactly does the spoon hurt anybody else apart from the fat person? Oh wow, another stupid fucking argument from a stupid idiot. And name me one person of wealth who doesn't have treatment available? You can't unless you lie, which you will surely do because you're proudly ignorant and Republicans just looooove to dismiss academics with their education and research and data and facts.

Connecticut. Colorado. Arizona. What links all of these? Availability of guns. Period. Argue that you dumb fucking cripple.

The point is that the spoon doesn't hurt anyone just like the gun doesn't.  The person using the spoon is the cause of himself getting fat just as the person pulling the trigger is responsible for the result of firing the weapon.  I cannot address your retort as to who does and who does not have treatment, I don't know everyone.  As far as Republicans go, I wouldn't know.  I am not a member of either party.  I never vote based on party affiliation.  But I will say that liberals wackos love to ignore real world facts and trials by using their academic text book theories which are so often disproven by said real world events.  Those states have a lot in common.  None of which (even the one that you imply) are of relevance.  Commonality does not dictate causation.  If any of what you say held even the slightest amount of water then Chicago would have no gun deaths at all, we all know that is not the case.  BTW nice job on the ad hominem attacks.  It is the typical tirade of last resort for those who have hatred and blindness to facts far in excess of their intelligence and ability to work hard for anything.

RatBastard wrote:
The point is that the spoon doesn't hurt anyone just like the gun doesn't.

i'll lay it out for you: a spoon CAN'T hurt other people or ruin their lives.

if you're going to build straw men, please make them of slightly higher quality.

sweetcell wrote:

RatBastard wrote:
The point is that the spoon doesn't hurt anyone just like the gun doesn't.

i'll lay it out for you: a spoon CAN'T hurt other people or ruin their lives.

if you're going to build straw men, please make them of slightly higher quality.

Ill lay it out.  A spoon can't hurt ANYONE'S life.  It is an inanimate object.  Its not the spoon's fault that the person is fat and it is not the guns fault that an irresponsible person pulled the trigger.  Please try to stay on topic and stop blaming objects for what people do.

RatBastard wrote:
Ill lay it out.  A spoon can't hurt ANYONE'S life.  It is an inanimate object.  Its not the spoon's fault that the person is fat and it is not the guns fault that an irresponsible person pulled the trigger.  Please try to stay on topic and stop blaming objects for what people do.

by your "logic", people should be allowed to have anything.  flame throwers.  nerve gas.  incendiary bombs.  "nuclear weapons don't kill people, people kill people".  yeah, really tenable position ya got there.

as a society, we've made decisions about what individuals can and can't have.  and those decisions have changed over the years.  we're finally getting around to changing some long-standing positions on guns, and the dinosaurs are going to have to deal with it. 

a little less with the personal attacks… that is all

sweetcell wrote:

RatBastard wrote:
Ill lay it out.  A spoon can't hurt ANYONE'S life.  It is an inanimate object.  Its not the spoon's fault that the person is fat and it is not the guns fault that an irresponsible person pulled the trigger.  Please try to stay on topic and stop blaming objects for what people do.

by your "logic", people should be allowed to have anything.  flame throwers.  nerve gas.  incendiary bombs.  "nuclear weapons don't kill people, people kill people".  yeah, really tenable position ya got there.

as a society, we've made decisions about what individuals can and can't have.  and those decisions have changed over the years.  we're finally getting around to changing some long-standing positions on guns, and the dinosaurs are going to have to deal with it. 

So now you agree with me! Thanks for understanding finally that the gun didn't do anything and that it was the INDIVIDUAL WHO PULLED THE TRIGGER…  But no I never stated people should have anything they want.  Still a nice try though.  Just so you know, it is not a 'position', it is a constitutional RIGHT.  Also if we are going to start banning things that are used to kill people (why we would I don't know, a ban does NOTHING to stop criminals from being criminals), lets start with cars, bath tubs, and drugs.  More people are killed each year by each of those tings than by people with firearms.  Oh yeah drugs are illegal, case in point how banning does not work.  Please form new on if you are going to try to make a point at least support it with facts instead of wishy-washy theory that has repeatedly proven to be inaccurate by real world facts.

BAN THE SPOONS!  THEY CAUSE PEOPLE TO BE FAT…

hey sweetcell . . . still in love with relaxer after that uncalled for horrible jab at rb?  is he still poster of the year in your eyes?  can he still share some of your homemade beer?  isn't this place great. 

shut up walkonby

using walkonby instead of walkie = the internet-equivalent of a parent addressing their child using their full name.