For Walky

http://www.religioustolerance.org/easter1.htm

so basically what this proves about today . . . is that some people believe their story is correct and everybody else is, of course, wrong, while others believe their story is correct and everybody else is wrong.  good ole religion.
walkonby wrote:
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/03/31/17540236-i-love-you-too-cardinal-dolan-says-catholic-church-must-embrace-gays-and-lesbians?lite

wow.


He did OK until he got to the last sentence.


"comes out"?  bitch please.  who didnt know?
walkonby wrote:


"comes out"?  bitch please.  who didnt know?


POTW
walkonby wrote:
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/04/03/17584491-first-amendment-doesnt-apply-here-nc-lawmakers-push-bill-for-state-religion?lite

it must really suck . . . to even be called a republican now. 



That is scary… 
RatBastard wrote:
walkonby wrote:
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/04/03/17584491-first-amendment-doesnt-apply-here-nc-lawmakers-push-bill-for-state-religion?lite

it must really suck . . . to even be called a republican now. 



That is scary… 


The good news is that there is no way that this would hold up in court if it were ever made law.  It just serves to show how back-fucking-asswards the religious right is…
grateful wrote:
RatBastard wrote:
walkonby wrote:
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/04/03/17584491-first-amendment-doesnt-apply-here-nc-lawmakers-push-bill-for-state-religion?lite

it must really suck . . . to even be called a republican now. 



That is scary… 


The good news is that there is no way that this would hold up in court if it were ever made law.  It just serves to show how back-fucking-asswards the religious right is…


I hope they choose something good like scientology.
atomicfront wrote:
grateful wrote:
RatBastard wrote:
walkonby wrote:
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/04/03/17584491-first-amendment-doesnt-apply-here-nc-lawmakers-push-bill-for-state-religion?lite

it must really suck . . . to even be called a republican now. 



That is scary… 


I was hoping for something that chose ALF as their supreme being and BLT as their manna.

The good news is that there is no way that this would hold up in court if it were ever made law.  It just serves to show how back-fucking-asswards the religious right is…


I hope they choose something good like scientology.
grateful wrote:
RatBastard wrote:
walkonby wrote:
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/04/03/17584491-first-amendment-doesnt-apply-here-nc-lawmakers-push-bill-for-state-religion?lite

it must really suck . . . to even be called a republican now. 



That is scary… 


The good news is that there is no way that this would hold up in court if it were ever made law.  It just serves to show how back-fucking-asswards the religious right is…


Just as wacky as the left wing nuts like Bammy and Feinstein.
so i had a funny call just now.

"this is a political call survey . . . are you in a private area that you can talk and be willing to answer questions?"

"yes?"

"are you a republican or a democrat or an independent?"

"democrat"

"oh im sorry sir . . . we have enough people to fill our quota in your area.  have a good night."

ok . . . what a funny country we live in.  if i would have said republican, would i have gotten to answer questions "that required i be in a private place to answer"?  do i say lol, or lolz now?
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/15/business/as-court-considers-gene-patents-case-may-overlook-relevant-issues.html?_r=0

why am i posting this?  because it is a great article with fascinating subjects and far out realities?  because it is scary stuff that makes you think and go, "man thats fucked up!"?  no . . . because look at those comments.  those might be the most thought out and intelligent comments i have ever seen on an internerd story.  good job human beings.
http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/04/22/17863203-senators-spar-over-boston-bombings-effect-on-immigration-bill?lite

i dont understand the immigration thing.  and the whole boston bombing just makes it worse.  is it a good thing or is it a bad thing to do it?  who are we really allowing in?  is a mass allowing of people in, really a good thing for our country at these financial times? 

http://inplainsight.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/04/22/17840373-poverty-in-america-millions-of-families-too-broke-for-bank-accounts?lite

by allowing a crap load of new people in . . . when a lot of the people who are here cant get by, will there be new companies created, new inventions made, new minds to make this country better?  will that create jobs?  how long does that take?  the bombers were kids when they came here, and came from a place that people blow stuff up to make a point of some kind.  only psychos do that, in our country.  because we are not psychos, and we lock up (and should kill all) psychos, in our country.  so it is a very confusing topic to think about and talk about, with out offending anybody . . . because that is all we ever do when we talk about anything.  i know we allowed a crap load of people in before through ellis island, and that seem to work out great; we are the profits of those people who came here.  but this is not 1900 america, this is 2013 america.
http://nblo.gs/KAnwn ;


This NYCTaper guy may be the greatest public servant of our time.